Murray / Gayle partnership

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

Stuart Shave Hampshire 03 Mar 14 1.20pm
With Chamakh injured, I honestly think his could be a blessing in disguise. Chamakh has done nothing wrong and worked his socks off but his injury should be used to see what a partnership of Muray/Gayle could offer us. I think they could compliment each other beautifully. Murray's heading ability and hold up play with Gayle's flair and pace. Bright & Wright anyone? Southampton is a great fixture to try it out in a 4-4-2 formation I think.
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuart Shave

Hampshire 03 Mar 14 1.20pm

With Chamakh injured, I honestly think his could be a blessing in disguise. Chamakh has done nothing wrong and worked his socks off but his injury should be used to see what a partnership of Muray/Gayle could offer us.

I think they could compliment each other beautifully. Murray's heading ability and hold up play with Gayle's flair and pace. Bright & Wright anyone? Southampton is a great fixture to try it out in a 4-4-2 formation I think.

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 03 Mar 14 1.26pm
Now is not the time to experiment. We need Puncheon back. Gayle is too lightweight to start. As a sub nearer the end 'yes'. When we are safe hopefully Dwight will be given his chance properly. Last two or three games. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 03 Mar 14 1.26pm

Now is not the time to experiment. We need Puncheon back. Gayle is too lightweight to start. As a sub nearer the end 'yes'.

When we are safe hopefully Dwight will be given his chance properly. Last two or three games.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

jimmyc 03 Mar 14 1.30pm
Quote Kermit8 at 03 Mar 2014 1.26pm Now is not the time to experiment. We need Puncheon back. Gayle is too lightweight to start. As a sub nearer the end 'yes'. When we are safe hopefully Dwight will be given his chance properly. Last two or three games. Has there been an official reason as to why Punch was left out on Sunday?....and I 100% agree with what you said.
Alert a moderator to this post

jimmyc

03 Mar 14 1.30pm

Quote Kermit8 at 03 Mar 2014 1.26pm

Now is not the time to experiment. We need Puncheon back. Gayle is too lightweight to start. As a sub nearer the end 'yes'.

When we are safe hopefully Dwight will be given his chance properly. Last two or three games.

Has there been an official reason as to why Punch was left out on Sunday?....and I 100% agree with what you said.

Alert a moderator to this post

croftonglazier Orpington 03 Mar 14 1.32pm
Quote Stuart Shave at 03 Mar 2014 1.20pm With Chamakh injured, I honestly think his could be a blessing in disguise. Chamakh has done nothing wrong and worked his socks off but his injury should be used to see what a partnership of Muray/Gayle could offer us. I think they could compliment each other beautifully. Murray's heading ability and hold up play with Gayle's flair and pace. Bright & Wright anyone? Southampton is a great fixture to try it out in a 4-4-2 formation I think. I totally agree. Gayle and Murray could complement eachother and I think it's worth trying. I really feel for Gayle as I think he's got the ability to succeed at this level and he hasnt been given the chance. Cameron Jerome and Murray are similar players and cant be played together. Murray winning flick ons for Gayle could be exciting. Edited by croftonglazier (03 Mar 2014 9.29pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

croftonglazier

Orpington 03 Mar 14 1.32pm

Send a Private Message to croftonglazier

Quote Stuart Shave at 03 Mar 2014 1.20pm

I totally agree. Gayle and Murray could complement eachother and I think it's worth trying. I really feel for Gayle as I think he's got the ability to succeed at this level and he hasnt been given the chance. Cameron Jerome and Murray are similar players and cant be played together. Murray winning flick ons for Gayle could be exciting.

Edited by croftonglazier (03 Mar 2014 9.29pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Andy_G Wimbledon 03 Mar 14 1.35pm
I think next season that could well be a good partnership but as Kermit says now is not the time to experiment. Play Murray up top with Bolasie, Puncheon, Ince behind. The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years
Alert a moderator to this post

Andy_G

Wimbledon 03 Mar 14 1.35pm

I think next season that could well be a good partnership but as Kermit says now is not the time to experiment. Play Murray up top with Bolasie, Puncheon, Ince behind.

The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years

Alert a moderator to this post

slubglurge welling 03 Mar 14 1.42pm
I would go for Murray up top with Ince tucked in behind him. Bolasie and Puncheon on the flanks. Oh and TP dont give Saints too much respect and sit too deep like the Manure game. They are a bit fragile at the moment so lets go for their throats and KO them in the first half
Alert a moderator to this post

slubglurge

welling 03 Mar 14 1.42pm

I would go for Murray up top with Ince tucked in behind him. Bolasie and Puncheon on the flanks. Oh and TP dont give Saints too much respect and sit too deep like the Manure game. They are a bit fragile at the moment so lets go for their throats and KO them in the first half

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 03 Mar 14 1.53pm
If Chamakh is injured, then I think we don't have much choice, though we might play Ince in behind Murray in a 4-5-1 - Chamakh will be a big loss to us though. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 03 Mar 14 1.53pm

If Chamakh is injured, then I think we don't have much choice, though we might play Ince in behind Murray in a 4-5-1 - Chamakh will be a big loss to us though.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

moylerg Cofton Hackett, Worcestershire 03 Mar 14 2.03pm
Quote jimmyc at 03 Mar 2014 1.30pm Quote Kermit8 at 03 Mar 2014 1.26pm Now is not the time to experiment. We need Puncheon back. Gayle is too lightweight to start. As a sub nearer the end 'yes'. When we are safe hopefully Dwight will be given his chance properly. Last two or three games. Has there been an official reason as to why Punch was left out on Sunday?....and I 100% agree with what you said. Yes, Pulis said "Punch was looking a bit tired" in his after match interview. Bless. Most certainly not European.
Alert a moderator to this post

moylerg

Cofton Hackett, Worcestershire 03 Mar 14 2.03pm

Quote jimmyc at 03 Mar 2014 1.30pm

Quote Kermit8 at 03 Mar 2014 1.26pm

Now is not the time to experiment. We need Puncheon back. Gayle is too lightweight to start. As a sub nearer the end 'yes'.

When we are safe hopefully Dwight will be given his chance properly. Last two or three games.

Has there been an official reason as to why Punch was left out on Sunday?....and I 100% agree with what you said.

Yes, Pulis said "Punch was looking a bit tired" in his after match interview. Bless.

Most certainly not European.

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 03 Mar 14 2.11pm
Quote croftonglazier at 03 Mar 2014 1.32pm Quote Stuart Shave at 03 Mar 2014 1.20pm With Chamakh injured, I honestly think his could be a blessing in disguise. Chamakh has done nothing wrong and worked his socks off but his injury should be used to see what a partnership of Muray/Gayle could offer us. I think they could compliment each other beautifully. Murray's heading ability and hold up play with Gayle's flair and pace. Bright & Wright anyone? Southampton is a great fixture to try it out in a 4-4-2 formation I think. I totally agree. Gayle and Murray could complement eachother and I think it's worth trying. I really feel for Gayle as I think he's got the ability to succeed at this level and he hasnt been given the chance. Cameron Jerome abnd Murray are similar players and cant be played together. Murray winning flick ons for Gayle could be exciting. I think with IH and now TP not picking him for the starting X1 it is fair to say he can't have shown enough in training to be chosen. If they don't think he is ready then neither do I. Not for the full 90 anyway. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 03 Mar 14 2.11pm

Quote croftonglazier at 03 Mar 2014 1.32pm

Quote Stuart Shave at 03 Mar 2014 1.20pm

I totally agree. Gayle and Murray could complement eachother and I think it's worth trying. I really feel for Gayle as I think he's got the ability to succeed at this level and he hasnt been given the chance. Cameron Jerome abnd Murray are similar players and cant be played together. Murray winning flick ons for Gayle could be exciting.

I think with IH and now TP not picking him for the starting X1 it is fair to say he can't have shown enough in training to be chosen.

If they don't think he is ready then neither do I. Not for the full 90 anyway.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

EastEndPalace WithHardNutsCosImAHardBastard 03 Mar 14 2.17pm
I think Jerome and Muzza looked really affective against Swansea, A bully with pace and a clinical finisher is better then a youngster who gets shrugged off the ball and on the odd occasion scores a goal. Bar Villa Gayle has always looked ineffective.
Alert a moderator to this post

EastEndPalace

WithHardNutsCosImAHardBastard 03 Mar 14 2.17pm

I think Jerome and Muzza looked really affective against Swansea, A bully with pace and a clinical finisher is better then a youngster who gets shrugged off the ball and on the odd occasion scores a goal. Bar Villa Gayle has always looked ineffective.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stuart Shave Hampshire 03 Mar 14 2.28pm
Quote EastEndPalace at 03 Mar 2014 2.17pm I think Jerome and Muzza looked really affective against Swansea, A bully with pace and a clinical finisher is better then a youngster who gets shrugged off the ball and on the odd occasion scores a goal. Bar Villa Gayle has always looked ineffective. That's because he's never been played in his most effective role - central with a partner.
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuart Shave

Hampshire 03 Mar 14 2.28pm

Quote EastEndPalace at 03 Mar 2014 2.17pm

That's because he's never been played in his most effective role - central with a partner.

Alert a moderator to this post

seeweedhater London 03 Mar 14 2.42pm
Quote EastEndPalace at 03 Mar 2014 2.17pm I think Jerome and Muzza looked really affective against Swansea, A bully with pace and a clinical finisher is better then a youngster who gets shrugged off the ball and on the odd occasion scores a goal. Bar Villa Gayle has always looked ineffective. Bloody hell he's only getting 7/8 mins recently nah lets opt for bully who cant score.at least he know where the goal is ,will keep defenders busy ask oshea. We need goals 19 is worst in prem ,could be a blessing chamach injured. feel confident ffs/gayle partnership.
Alert a moderator to this post

seeweedhater

London 03 Mar 14 2.42pm

Quote EastEndPalace at 03 Mar 2014 2.17pm

Bloody hell he's only getting 7/8 mins recently nah lets opt for bully who cant score.at least he know where the goal is ,will keep defenders busy ask oshea.
We need goals 19 is worst in prem ,could be a blessing chamach injured.

feel confident ffs/gayle partnership.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Murray / Gayle partnership

Site Map

Sponsors