Football & Sexual diversity
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 buzby1  Devon 04 Mar 15 3.29pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
From the questionnaire... 'If a sportsman touches a teammate’s bottom when scoring a goal, it is because he is gay' This can't be serious? Is someone taking gender equality piss?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Part Time James 04 Mar 15 3.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote buzby1 at 04 Mar 2015 3.29pm
From the questionnaire... 'If a sportsman touches a teammate’s bottom when scoring a goal, it is because he is gay' This can't be serious? Is someone taking gender equality piss? It's rape if he doesn't buy him dinner first.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Seth  On a pale blue dot 04 Mar 15 3.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sydtheeagle at 04 Mar 2015 3.26pm
Quote Beaverwilly at 04 Mar 2015 4.50am
Why can't we just enjoy football without bringing gender, race, sexuality etc. into it? Personally I couldn't care less if you are tall, short, fat, thin, white, black, gay, straight... whatever just keep it to yourself as will I and concentrate on the sport which is why we are all here after all. And this is from someone who calls himself "Beaverwilly". Oh, the irony...
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sydtheeagle England 04 Mar 15 3.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
f*** me, that was entertaining. The image of lesbian sportswomen kissing each other to celebrate a victory should be avoided in sport events Edited by sydtheeagle (04 Mar 2015 3.37pm)
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Part Time James 04 Mar 15 3.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sydtheeagle at 04 Mar 2015 3.36pm
f*** me, that was entertaining. The image of lesbian sportswomen kissing each other to celebrate a victory should be avoided in sport events Edited by sydtheeagle (04 Mar 2015 3.37pm) It would definitely justify all the grunting in tennis.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| imbored UK 04 Mar 15 7.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I concur. We don't need to hear about players sexual preferences. I mean countless players are shockingly open about their girlfriends and wives. They positively flaunt them. It's pretty off putting. If only they'd follow the lead of the model citizen gay footballers and zip it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Beaverwilly Croydon 05 Mar 15 12.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sydtheeagle at 04 Mar 2015 3.26pm
Quote Beaverwilly at 04 Mar 2015 4.50am
Why can't we just enjoy football without bringing gender, race, sexuality etc. into it? Personally I couldn't care less if you are tall, short, fat, thin, white, black, gay, straight... whatever just keep it to yourself as will I and concentrate on the sport which is why we are all here after all. And this is from someone who calls himself "Beaverwilly". Oh, the irony... And you have no idea where the nickname arose from it is your own mind which has connected it to sexual innuendo I presume. Besides, are you saying you disagree with my post?
Whenever I feel the need to exercise, I lie down until it goes away. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 05 Mar 15 1.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
LGBT & no mention of (I)meaning Intersex whatever that happens to be/is. So it should LGBTI to give it it's proper name. Anyway back on point Matt is right too many people are getting pigeon holed (no disrespect to pigeons)this in my opinion what causes a lot of these prejudices in the first place. As I said to the very keen student just the other day asking people about 'Gay Rights' "How many more rights do you need?'
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| imbored UK 05 Mar 15 1.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Jimenez at 05 Mar 2015 1.27am
LGBT & no mention of (I)meaning Intersex whatever that happens to be/is. So it should LGBTI to give it it's proper name. Anyway back on point Matt is right too many people are getting pigeon holed (no disrespect to pigeons)this in my opinion what causes a lot of these prejudices in the first place. As I said to the very keen student just the other day asking people about 'Gay Rights' "How many more rights do you need?' In some states Marriage perhaps? People do not pop out of the womb defining themselves as gay. The other side of the coin is that the law itself has differentiated, which is also a fixation on sexuality. How exactly do you get to a point where it doesn't, by 'not' talking about these issues? Increased visibility and discussion is the precise reason laws change and people are less likely to be excluded.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 05 Mar 15 2.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote imbored at 05 Mar 2015 1.54am
Quote Jimenez at 05 Mar 2015 1.27am
LGBT & no mention of (I)meaning Intersex whatever that happens to be/is. So it should LGBTI to give it it's proper name. Anyway back on point Matt is right too many people are getting pigeon holed (no disrespect to pigeons)this in my opinion what causes a lot of these prejudices in the first place. As I said to the very keen student just the other day asking people about 'Gay Rights' "How many more rights do you need?' In some states Marriage perhaps? People do not pop out of the womb defining themselves as gay. The other side of the coin is that the law itself has differentiated, which is also a fixation on sexuality. How exactly do you get to a point where it doesn't, by 'not' talking about these issues? Increased visibility and discussion is the precise reason laws change and people are less likely to be excluded.
Edited by Jimenez (05 Mar 2015 2.03am)
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| imbored UK 05 Mar 15 2.06am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Jimenez at 05 Mar 2015 2.00am
Quote imbored at 05 Mar 2015 1.54am
Quote Jimenez at 05 Mar 2015 1.27am
LGBT & no mention of (I)meaning Intersex whatever that happens to be/is. So it should LGBTI to give it it's proper name. Anyway back on point Matt is right too many people are getting pigeon holed (no disrespect to pigeons)this in my opinion what causes a lot of these prejudices in the first place. As I said to the very keen student just the other day asking people about 'Gay Rights' "How many more rights do you need?' In some states Marriage perhaps? People do not pop out of the womb defining themselves as gay. The other side of the coin is that the law itself has differentiated, which is also a fixation on sexuality. How exactly do you get to a point where it doesn't, by 'not' talking about these issues? Increased visibility and discussion is the precise reason laws change and people are less likely to be excluded.
I didn't say it was in your state. Also, this is ceasing to be liberal or conservative issue anyway. Even in the states they are gradually moving beyond such narrow definitions. You're pigeonholing people too it seems. There are multiple aspects to everything. Nuance exists. Others catered for the side that says 'these endevours do more harm than good, we should shut up about sexuality'. I stated the idea that without empathetic discussion of these issues and a bit of openness, there would have been less progress legally and within society. That's not 'liberal', not 'conservative', it's what's actually happened. It's clearly a comment on society that there are no openly gay footballers in the premier league for instance, and if someone is doing a survey into this area, is it really something you should be frustrating yourself over? Edited by imbored (05 Mar 2015 3.18am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Casual Orpington 05 Mar 15 7.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Gutted I just read all of that boring s**t.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.