You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > So all these poor sods in the Med...
April 26 2024 1.16am

So all these poor sods in the Med...

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 13 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Apr 15 3.57pm

Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 3.09pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 2.14pm

Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 1.27pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 1.25pm

We're not a mediterranean country.

If this was happening in the Irish sea, North sea or Channel do you think Malta, Italy and Cyprus would be dealing with it?

No we would be, along with the other countries adjacent to those bodies of water.


What do you think are the chances of Malta, Italy or Cyprus deciding to bomb Ireland back to the stoneage?

We didn't bomb Libya back to the stoneage and they seemed quite keen on getting rid of Gaddafi at the time.

The majority attempting to cross aren't Libyan either so that's a bollocks argument to begin with.

I was going to reply and tell you how wrong your are..... but everybody else seems to have beat me to it

Its not entirely wrong, effectively the bombing campaign coupled with the uprising and conflict essentially create a failed state that lacked the apparatus and capacity for authority of the state and state functionality.

Syria would be the biggest problem. What efforts did we go to for the aid of Syrian refugees fleeing from the war, IS etc. The important thing in these situations is to try to establish effective refugee communities in the neighbouring nations where people flee too. If you can build camps where life isn't 'too bad' then people tend to stay there.

Problem is, usually that's left to the UN and the countrys flooded with refugees to deal with (and we're not the only guilty party, the world is).


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 22 Apr 15 3.59pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 3.09pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 2.14pm

Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 1.27pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 1.25pm

We're not a mediterranean country.

If this was happening in the Irish sea, North sea or Channel do you think Malta, Italy and Cyprus would be dealing with it?

No we would be, along with the other countries adjacent to those bodies of water.


What do you think are the chances of Malta, Italy or Cyprus deciding to bomb Ireland back to the stoneage?

We didn't bomb Libya back to the stoneage and they seemed quite keen on getting rid of Gaddafi at the time.

The majority attempting to cross aren't Libyan either so that's a bollocks argument to begin with.

I was going to reply and tell you how wrong your are..... but everybody else seems to have beat me to it


There's no right or wrong. It's opinions.

How are we at fault for Eritreans, Syrians, Moroccans etc and why does Africa not have to do anything about it, only Europe?

I'd be happy for us to assist with stopping boats leaving Africa but no one seems to want to do that.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Johnny Eagles's Profile Johnny Eagles Flag berlin 22 Apr 15 4.08pm Send a Private Message to Johnny Eagles Add Johnny Eagles as a friend

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 3.50pm

It is bollocks, if they were 90% Libyan blame us. After the USA and France that is, they led the call on that.

I'd rather we had left them to it in Iraq, Afghan, Libya along with the whole Arab spring malarky.

The easier/safer anyone makes the route, the more people will use it.


That's a bit naive, if I may say so.

If Libya were (as it was for years) a stable state with working institutions (albeit corrupt and oppressive ones) it would be controlling its borders. They'd stop all the would-be immigrants from getting to the coast.

Now Libya is effectively a broken state with open borders. Ergo, all and sundry are free to try and get to Italy.

 


...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 22 Apr 15 5.00pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Johnny Eagles at 22 Apr 2015 4.08pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 3.50pm

It is bollocks, if they were 90% Libyan blame us. After the USA and France that is, they led the call on that.

I'd rather we had left them to it in Iraq, Afghan, Libya along with the whole Arab spring malarky.

The easier/safer anyone makes the route, the more people will use it.


That's a bit naive, if I may say so.

If Libya were (as it was for years) a stable state with working institutions (albeit corrupt and oppressive ones) it would be controlling its borders. They'd stop all the would-be immigrants from getting to the coast.

Now Libya is effectively a broken state with open borders. Ergo, all and sundry are free to try and get to Italy.


Do you really think countries like that give/gave a s*** about their poor/homeless leaving the country? Never mind trying to stop them. Unless someone "owned" them they wouldn't care less.

Stop them at departure then, before all of the risks, rather than waiting until they're in the s*** and hopefully getting them out of it.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 22 Apr 15 5.23pm

Quote Johnny Eagles at 22 Apr 2015 2.33pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 2.14pm

Quote ghosteagle at 22 Apr 2015 1.27pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 1.25pm

We're not a mediterranean country.

If this was happening in the Irish sea, North sea or Channel do you think Malta, Italy and Cyprus would be dealing with it?

No we would be, along with the other countries adjacent to those bodies of water.


What do you think are the chances of Malta, Italy or Cyprus deciding to bomb Ireland back to the stoneage?

We didn't bomb Libya back to the stoneage and they seemed quite keen on getting rid of Gaddafi at the time.

The majority attempting to cross aren't Libyan either so that's a bollocks argument to begin with.

It's not a bollocks argument, Stu. One of the reasons the West supported the 'strong men' in North Africa for so long was because they did us a favour in controlling immigration.

Ironically, the do-gooding people who are now hand-wringing about drowning immigrants are the same ones who were egging on the "rebels" during the Arab spring.

If they REALLY cared, they'd be out there trying to rescue people themselves.

If, like me, they find it mildly disconcerting when they hear about it on the news, but then quickly put it to the backs of their mind before they carry on worrying about their own tedious little lives, then they'd do better not to go blowing too hard on the old self-righteousness trumpet.

Edited by Johnny Eagles (22 Apr 2015 2.35pm)


I don't think this is true, this was an excuse used by the US, UK and French governments to usurp Gadhafi.

You go can even further back, but you may recollect the F1-111 bombing of Libya in 86. Although a dictator, with all the trappings, Gadhafi, in the late 90s and 00s, took a position of being a mediator and also was trying to use Libyan petro-dollars to aid sub-Saharan states.

He even apologised for Arab involvement in the slave trade, something must HOL'ers were up in arms about when "one eye" did something similar.

Edited by pefwin (22 Apr 2015 5.23pm)

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 22 Apr 15 5.23pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 5.00pm

Quote Johnny Eagles at 22 Apr 2015 4.08pm

Quote Stuk at 22 Apr 2015 3.50pm

It is bollocks, if they were 90% Libyan blame us. After the USA and France that is, they led the call on that.

I'd rather we had left them to it in Iraq, Afghan, Libya along with the whole Arab spring malarky.

The easier/safer anyone makes the route, the more people will use it.


That's a bit naive, if I may say so.

If Libya were (as it was for years) a stable state with working institutions (albeit corrupt and oppressive ones) it would be controlling its borders. They'd stop all the would-be immigrants from getting to the coast.

Now Libya is effectively a broken state with open borders. Ergo, all and sundry are free to try and get to Italy.


Do you really think countries like that give/gave a s*** about their poor/homeless leaving the country? Never mind trying to stop them. Unless someone "owned" them they wouldn't care less.

Stop them at departure then, before all of the risks, rather than waiting until they're in the s*** and hopefully getting them out of it.


I'm with you Stu.

Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown.

Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run.

Let them sort themselves out.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 22 Apr 15 5.31pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 22 Apr 2015 5.23pm

I'm with you Stu.

Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown.

Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run.

Let them sort themselves out.

So that's the whole of the UK navy and who else?

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 22 Apr 15 5.39pm

Quote pefwin at 22 Apr 2015 5.31pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 22 Apr 2015 5.23pm

I'm with you Stu.

Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown.

Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run.

Let them sort themselves out.

So that's the whole of the UK navy and who else?


Hahaha.... spot on Peffers!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 22 Apr 15 6.21pm

They should be given sanctuary in the nearest safe country. Through Italy, through Spain, through Eastern Europe, through Germany, through France, Through Belgium then safely into the UK

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 22 Apr 15 7.22pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote pefwin at 22 Apr 2015 5.31pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 22 Apr 2015 5.23pm

I'm with you Stu.

Just post half a dozen smallish armed naval vessels off the coast of Libya and send them back to port before they get into trouble/drown.

Don't interfere with any country in North Africa or anywhere else because it doesn't help in the long run.

Let them sort themselves out.

So that's the whole of the UK navy and who else?


Why don't the 5 north african countries use some of the annual 800m they get collectively in aid from the EU and the UK alone? Mare Nostrum was costing about 9m euros per month.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rob1969's Profile rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 22 Apr 15 9.22pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

Agree with all the "we brought it upon ourselves" etc but we can't put the clock back - we are here now.

How about redirecting some of the millions we currently give in foreign aid - to regional super powers like India - to help finance the search/rescue operation in the med. Then use the balance of it to improve the lot in the areas that most refugees coming from. Give the aid through UK charities working locally in these countries - not their governments for obvious reasons. Not a solution but might be a start. The only long term solution is some form of redistribution of nations wealth. Not a vote winner !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 22 Apr 15 9.29pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

I have nothing but admiration for those poor dispossessed and traumatised souls trying to get some kind of life going to a foreign place many miles from what was their home and is no longer.

It's a suicide mission for many but good luck to the ones that make it.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 13 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > So all these poor sods in the Med...