Look what you've done!
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
nickgusset  Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 5.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 5.15pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.41pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 4.34pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm
Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***. Speaks volumes I'm afraid. I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too. I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.
Poor trolling. Must try harder. My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?
But of course you are in favour of mighty sledgehammers when it comes to so called racially aggravated 'crimes' and hounding bakers who disapprove of same sex marriage and other 'nuts'. You are obsessed by gay cake as well. Do you roll a dice to choose which deflecting argument you will use next. Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 4.42pm) Merely highlighting the double standards of people with your outlook Nick.
If one were to retort in your fashion they might imply that those with your outlook bemoan the fact that 'c**n' and 'w**' have disappeared from the vernacular.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| leggedstruggle Croydon 22 Jul 15 6.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 5.27pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 5.15pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.41pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 4.34pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm
Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***. Speaks volumes I'm afraid. I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too. I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.
Poor trolling. Must try harder. My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?
But of course you are in favour of mighty sledgehammers when it comes to so called racially aggravated 'crimes' and hounding bakers who disapprove of same sex marriage and other 'nuts'. You are obsessed by gay cake as well. Do you roll a dice to choose which deflecting argument you will use next. Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 4.42pm) Merely highlighting the double standards of people with your outlook Nick.
If one were to retort in your fashion they might imply that those with your outlook bemoan the fact that 'c**n' and 'w**' have disappeared from the vernacular. You are not known for your criticism of IS. I'm sure you don't support IS. You, just like the rest of the left, bend over backwards to give Islamic extremism the benefit of the doubt with all sort of spurious reasons for their activities. Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 6.29pm)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 22 Jul 15 6.36pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| leggedstruggle Croydon 22 Jul 15 6.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history. We are more or less obliged to use these courts while we are shackled to the EU - another very good reason to vote to leave when the time comes.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 6.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history.
Bloody human rights, getting in the way of giving people basic human rights.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 22 Jul 15 7.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 6.51pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history.
Bloody human rights, getting in the way of giving people basic human rights.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 22 Jul 15 7.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 6.48pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history. We are more or less obliged to use these courts while we are shackled to the EU - another very good reason to vote to leave when the time comes.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 7.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 7.01pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 6.51pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history.
Bloody human rights, getting in the way of giving people basic human rights.
You expect this lot (let alone any other lot) to come up with anything 'common sense' f***ing hell, people are so gullible for abstract nouns... What would be part of a 'common sense' bill of human rights? Have a look through the current Human rights act and tell us what should be removed, in your opinion. I've had a look through and there seem to be enough legal caveats to cover terrorism.
How many instances of the flouting of the human rights act , the sort that you are alluding to, are there in the UK per year?
Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 7.14pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 22 Jul 15 7.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
We should make our own laws and enforce them in our own courts.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 7.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 7.30pm
We should make our own laws and enforce them in our own courts.
Funny how we bemoan other countries for eroding human rights, but don't fuss when theirs are about to be taken away from them.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 22 Jul 15 7.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.13pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 7.01pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 6.51pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history.
Bloody human rights, getting in the way of giving people basic human rights.
You expect this lot (let alone any other lot) to come up with anything 'common sense' f***ing hell, people are so gullible for abstract nouns... What would be part of a 'common sense' bill of human rights? Have a look through the current Human rights act and tell us what should be removed, in your opinion. I've had a look through and there seem to be enough legal caveats to cover terrorism.
How many instances of the flouting of the human rights act , the sort that you are alluding to, are there in the UK per year?
Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 7.14pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 7.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 7.47pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.13pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 7.01pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 6.51pm
Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.36pm
If the Human Rights act is scrapped then that would be the best thing that could happen. Because of this criminal's and terrorist's charter we can't get rid of these f**k**g parasites who come over here stowed away on the back of trucks and come here to claim benefits and enjoy a health system that they've NEVER even contributed to. It's the reason why prisoners may get the vote, it's the reason that people are allowed to sue over something that happened over 100 hundred years ago ie people suing over the slave trade. It's the reason that terrorists, murderers and rapists have more bloody rights than their victims. Screw the human rights act and screw the European Court of Human Rights. The sooner we're without these riduclous acts the better. it can only be an improvement if the Human Rights Act is consigned to the dustbin of history.
Bloody human rights, getting in the way of giving people basic human rights.
You expect this lot (let alone any other lot) to come up with anything 'common sense' f***ing hell, people are so gullible for abstract nouns... What would be part of a 'common sense' bill of human rights? Have a look through the current Human rights act and tell us what should be removed, in your opinion. I've had a look through and there seem to be enough legal caveats to cover terrorism.
How many instances of the flouting of the human rights act , the sort that you are alluding to, are there in the UK per year?
Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 7.14pm)
Quote The Human rights act is an absolute disaster. I'll tell you what rights immigrants shouldn't have the right to coming here and ripping the dam system off for a start. I don't pay my taxes to support some scum bag who hates our way of life but will willingly take our charity. The current levels of immigration are totally unsustainable. Half these cockroaches should be deported and not let back in. I don't expect any politician of any political persuasion to come up with anything common sense, especially those of left leaning views. As for what should be removed from the current human rights act? Well I wouldn't remove anything......I'd tear the whole dam thing up. It was because of the human rights act that we couldn't get rid of captain hook for the best part of ten years, that Choudary couldn't be deported because of his 'right to a family life'. What about the god dam right of the people of this country not to be blown up on their daily commute? Hell there was even some judge who refused to deport an immigrant, WHO WAS HERE ILLEGALY, because he had a cat, and therefore had 'a family life' in this country. My view will NOT change on it, it should be ripped up, end of.
Do you even know what the human rights act contains? Are you saying because of one case involving a cat, where the judge was obviously an arse (I doubt the event even happened but I'd be happy to be put right) is reason to tear up one of the most important documents in recent history?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.