Bright v Benteke

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

monkey 16 Feb 18 5.13am
For sheer guts, determination and a willingness to sweat blood for your team and bring others into the game, it’s a no brainer and an embarrassing comparison!! Mark Bright would put his head where Benteke wouldn’t even put a foot in. A much better comparison with Brighty would be Muzza and worth the debate.
Alert a moderator to this post

monkey

16 Feb 18 5.13am

For sheer guts, determination and a willingness to sweat blood for your team and bring others into the game, it’s a no brainer and an embarrassing comparison!! Mark Bright would put his head where Benteke wouldn’t even put a foot in.
A much better comparison with Brighty would be Muzza and worth the debate.

Alert a moderator to this post

Casual Orpington 16 Feb 18 6.22am
Originally posted by ZIGnZAG Your still completely oblivious to a certain massive difference, which your stupid to overlook. One is played as a lone striker. One was part of a partnership. SAS Sutton and shearer. York and Cole. Bright and Wright. Benteke and...... That's the difference. Your comparing one man doing the whole job, alone. To another man who did 50% of the job, while someone else did the other 50%. So maybe.... just to be fair.... ask yourself.... Does benteke do 50% of a job? Because that's what bright did. So Benteke must get twice as many chances , as they would all fall to him ? So the real question should be ‘would Mark Bright have scored 1 goal if he was playing this season?’
Alert a moderator to this post

Casual

Orpington 16 Feb 18 6.22am

Originally posted by ZIGnZAG

Your still completely oblivious to a certain massive difference, which your stupid to overlook.

One is played as a lone striker.

One was part of a partnership.

SAS Sutton and shearer.

York and Cole.

Bright and Wright.

Benteke and......

That's the difference. Your comparing one man doing the whole job, alone. To another man who did 50% of the job, while someone else did the other 50%.

So maybe.... just to be fair.... ask yourself.... Does benteke do 50% of a job?
Because that's what bright did.

So Benteke must get twice as many chances , as they would all fall to him ?
So the real question should be ‘would Mark Bright have scored 1 goal if he was playing this season?’

Alert a moderator to this post

Casual Orpington 16 Feb 18 6.24am
Originally posted by Casual So Benteke must get twice as many chances , as they would all fall to him ? So the real question should be ‘would Mark Bright have scored 1 goal if he was playing this season?’ I think he would be on more than 1 goal, even at his current age, wearing a suit , with Parish playing as a number 10.
Alert a moderator to this post

Casual

Orpington 16 Feb 18 6.24am

Originally posted by Casual

So Benteke must get twice as many chances , as they would all fall to him ?
So the real question should be ‘would Mark Bright have scored 1 goal if he was playing this season?’

I think he would be on more than 1 goal, even at his current age, wearing a suit , with Parish playing as a number 10.

Alert a moderator to this post

OldFella London 16 Feb 18 7.58am
Originally posted by Casual I think he would be on more than 1 goal, even at his current age, wearing a suit , with Parish playing as a number 10. Parish playing in the hole behind Bright? Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it..
Alert a moderator to this post

OldFella

London 16 Feb 18 7.58am

Originally posted by Casual

I think he would be on more than 1 goal, even at his current age, wearing a suit , with Parish playing as a number 10.

Parish playing in the hole behind Bright?

Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it..

Alert a moderator to this post

Casual Orpington 16 Feb 18 9.48am
Originally posted by OldFella Parish playing in the hole behind Bright? [/quote Ha. I’d have assumed it would be the other way around
Alert a moderator to this post

Tom-the-eagle Croydon 16 Feb 18 9.58am
Originally posted by Casual Originally posted by OldFella Parish playing in the hole behind Bright? [/quote Ha. I’d have assumed it would be the other way around Ha ha - your on form today mate Edited by Tom-the-eagle (16 Feb 2018 9.59am) "It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit
Alert a moderator to this post

Andy_G Wimbledon 16 Feb 18 10.01am
That' not a serious question right? Benteke or Langley who is better? The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years
Alert a moderator to this post

Andy_G

Wimbledon 16 Feb 18 10.01am

That' not a serious question right?

Benteke or Langley who is better?

The ups and downs of Palace have left me older than my years

Alert a moderator to this post

Fatherken 16 Feb 18 10.09am
In my view Bright was a better all round player than Wright , never stopped running and looking to get other player into the game . Unfortunately Big Ben does not do this so it's Bright for me .
Alert a moderator to this post

Fatherken

16 Feb 18 10.09am

In my view Bright was a better all round player than Wright , never stopped running and looking to get other player into the game . Unfortunately Big Ben does not do this so it's Bright for me .

Alert a moderator to this post

Frickin Saweet South Cronx 16 Feb 18 10.27am
Originally posted by ZIGnZAG Your still completely oblivious to a certain massive difference, which your stupid to overlook. One is played as a lone striker. One was part of a partnership. SAS Sutton and shearer. York and Cole. Bright and Wright. Benteke and...... That's the difference. Your comparing one man doing the whole job, alone. To another man who did 50% of the job, while someone else did the other 50%. So maybe.... just to be fair.... ask yourself.... Does benteke do 50% of a job? Because that's what bright did. That doesn't make any sense. Formations aside, Bright did 100% of the job he was tasked with and did it well. Benteke is probably doing more like 60% of the job he is being tasked with and that's generous. Both players played in a team of 11 so neither did it all on their own.
Alert a moderator to this post

Frickin Saweet

South Cronx 16 Feb 18 10.27am

Send a Private Message to Frickin Saweet

Originally posted by ZIGnZAG

Your still completely oblivious to a certain massive difference, which your stupid to overlook.

One is played as a lone striker.

One was part of a partnership.

SAS Sutton and shearer.

York and Cole.

Bright and Wright.

Benteke and......

That's the difference. Your comparing one man doing the whole job, alone. To another man who did 50% of the job, while someone else did the other 50%.

So maybe.... just to be fair.... ask yourself.... Does benteke do 50% of a job?
Because that's what bright did.

That doesn't make any sense. Formations aside, Bright did 100% of the job he was tasked with and did it well. Benteke is probably doing more like 60% of the job he is being tasked with and that's generous. Both players played in a team of 11 so neither did it all on their own.

Alert a moderator to this post

ZIGnZAG Stoke 16 Feb 18 10.43am
Originally posted by OldFella Think you're on a sticky wicket calling someone stupid.... My bad, soz sir. Edited by ZIGnZAG (16 Feb 2018 10.49am)
Alert a moderator to this post

ZIGnZAG

Stoke 16 Feb 18 10.43am

Originally posted by OldFella

Think you're on a sticky wicket calling someone stupid....

My bad, soz sir.

Edited by ZIGnZAG (16 Feb 2018 10.49am)

Alert a moderator to this post

ZIGnZAG Stoke 16 Feb 18 10.49am
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet That doesn't make any sense. Formations aside, Bright did 100% of the job he was tasked with and did it well. Benteke is probably doing more like 60% of the job he is being tasked with and that's generous. Both players played in a team of 11 so neither did it all on their own. Formations aside. Sorry what. Bright may not have had the effect he did if he was played as a lone striker. Try playing Benteke in a partnership, like Bright did. Then it would be fair to compare the two.
Alert a moderator to this post

ZIGnZAG

Stoke 16 Feb 18 10.49am

Originally posted by Frickin Saweet

Formations aside. Sorry what.

Bright may not have had the effect he did if he was played as a lone striker.

Try playing Benteke in a partnership, like Bright did. Then it would be fair to compare the two.

Alert a moderator to this post

MonsterMunch Cambridge 16 Feb 18 10.59am
The answer should overwhelmingly be Benteke. On top form Benteke would probably blow Brighty away. Thing is we are just not seeing it anymore and certainly can’t rely on him anymore. Benteke should be the top,top striker we thought we and Liverpool paid all that money for. The two goals he has scored have dont nothing to get him out of this rut he’s in. I’d stick Brighty in the 11 now let alone back in his playing days. Edited by MonsterMunch (16 Feb 2018 11.00am)
Alert a moderator to this post

MonsterMunch

Cambridge 16 Feb 18 10.59am

The answer should overwhelmingly be Benteke. On top form Benteke would probably blow Brighty away. Thing is we are just not seeing it anymore and certainly can’t rely on him anymore. Benteke should be the top,top striker we thought we and Liverpool paid all that money for. The two goals he has scored have dont nothing to get him out of this rut he’s in. I’d stick Brighty in the 11 now let alone back in his playing days.

Edited by MonsterMunch (16 Feb 2018 11.00am)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Bright v Benteke

Site Map

Sponsors