You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 1 2024 3.51pm

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1381 of 2586 < 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 >

Topic Locked

View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 30 Jan 19 5.05pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

No, pro-brexit labour places will be the big losers, wasn't it always that way.

I struggle to even get close to this - Brexit before Brexit?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 30 Jan 19 5.28pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

I would think the minimum the EU would consider would be over the future arrangements, so I think that customs union would be of interest.

The UK would be open over Gibraltar again and access to UK waters for fishing which slipped through last time.

Really the EU can cope with no deal and should get rid of the UK, a complete pain in the a**e over so long.

The EU can simply make no progress with the UK dragging it down perpetually.

Politely, but firmly, UK 'on yer bike'.

As for the 39 billion, well UK you are spending 56 billion on a railway, keep it and extend the line to Crewe.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jan 19 5.38pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

As for the 39 billion, well UK you are spending 56 billion on a railway, keep it and extend the line to Crewe.

Making sense as usual I see Steely.

Railways can last for hundreds of years....How long does 39 billion last on our current contributions.

Well, we were paying at least 14 billion a year in 2014.

I think the most remainer friendly review of UK contributions to the EU put it that UK receives £1 for every £1.55 given.

Others estimates aren't as generous.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 30 Jan 19 5.51pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

The point is you lose something tangible but what do you get in return?

If there is belief or, as I suppose is common now, the buying into sensationalised tabloid stories about health tourism, then that is something the government should worry about, people like us shouldn't really give a toss

Believe me it is real (not only from the EU) . Costs the NHS millions, very difficult to do anything about, believe me I do give a toss about it. Do you not have this problem in Holland?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 30 Jan 19 6.07pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

'Maybe I am missing something'

B you certainly are, whether the UK could deliver on any revised withdrawal agreement, but also who are they dealing with, is it Mrs May the PM of the UK or of the conservative party ?????????

Of course I am not certain just a voter after all and it depends on what concessions the EU offers. That was the point of last nights votes Parliament now has a way forward we may not like it and if the EU refuse to negotiate then it is irrelevant.

The EU are playing chicken knowing that the deal as it stands will not get through Parliament.

Now in your later post you suggest that maybe the EU just wants rid of us and I am sympathetic to that idea. You are correct that we have been holding the EU back every time they try to make changes.

So if they actually want us to "crash out" then that attitude makes sense. If they genuinely want a deal then I think they run the risk of over playing their hand.

Anyway there is posturing on both side so until a deal is agreed or negotiations are called off we should take public statements with a pinch of salt.


 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 30 Jan 19 6.24pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Of course I am not certain just a voter after all and it depends on what concessions the EU offers. That was the point of last nights votes Parliament now has a way forward we may not like it and if the EU refuse to negotiate then it is irrelevant.

The EU are playing chicken knowing that the deal as it stands will not get through Parliament.

Now in your later post you suggest that maybe the EU just wants rid of us and I am sympathetic to that idea. You are correct that we have been holding the EU back every time they try to make changes.

So if they actually want us to "crash out" then that attitude makes sense. If they genuinely want a deal then I think they run the risk of over playing their hand.

Anyway there is posturing on both side so until a deal is agreed or negotiations are called off we should take public statements with a pinch of salt.


I appreciate your genuine debate.

Can't see anything good here B.

Article 50 should never have been implemented, how amateur can it get, without any idea or plan of the future.

Against all advice so I understand.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
steve1984 30 Jan 19 8.38pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays


Are you eating waffles with your waffles?

No I was referring to the idea that recognising one's weaknesses is in fact a strength, whilst ploughing on as if you have the upper hand when in fact you're completely under the cosh is a weakness.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 30 Jan 19 8.54pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

Believe me it is real (not only from the EU) . Costs the NHS millions, very difficult to do anything about, believe me I do give a toss about it. Do you not have this problem in Holland?

A while ago on lbc someone from abroad had they said 5k of treatment.
Whearby they offered to pay there and then and were told they couldnt and needed to be invoiced at their home address wherever that was.
Every hospital must have an accounts dept.
The mind boggles and a bit of blue sky thinking is needed.
I reckon a majority of patients from abroad would gladly pay for their treatment if they could but cant because of administration.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 30 Jan 19 8.59pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Tony Blair: The backstop isn't the only flaw in the PM's Brexit deal. She's effectively saying 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'.

We were always promised we'd know the future relationship with the EU before leaving.

But we don't, a few weeks before some type of exit, we just don't have a clue.

It's like moving house, but not knowing where your new address is.

Nobody would do that, but leave would.

So would the conservative party, parliament, the media, and there is no figure to step in and make us see sense.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 30 Jan 19 9.25pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Tony Blair: The backstop isn't the only flaw in the PM's Brexit deal. She's effectively saying 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'.

We were always promised we'd know the future relationship with the EU before leaving.

But we don't, a few weeks before some type of exit, we just don't have a clue.

It's like moving house, but not knowing where your new address is.

Nobody would do that, but leave would.

So would the conservative party, parliament, the media, and there is no figure to step in and make us see sense.

I am not sure that is a fair comment by Blair.

The EU laid down the rules of negotiation and flatly refused to discuss future relations with the UK until after we had agreed the process for disentangling ourselves from them.

In fairness the government wanted to hold parallel talks on both topics which the EU rejected.

Not for the first time Mr Blair is distorting things.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View davenotamonkey's Profile davenotamonkey Flag 31 Jan 19 12.44am Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey Add davenotamonkey as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I am not sure that is a fair comment by Blair.

The EU laid down the rules of negotiation and flatly refused to discuss future relations with the UK until after we had agreed the process for disentangling ourselves from them.

In fairness the government wanted to hold parallel talks on both topics which the EU rejected.

Not for the first time Mr Blair is distorting things.

It's also deeply ironic, given the wonderful self-amending treaties his piece of s*** party signed us up to.

'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'

So, Remainers. What's the destination for the EU train you wanted us on?

Is it the "Clegg Dangerous Fantasy" station?
Cameron's "non-existent reforming deal" station?
The Schuman-model station?
The hardcore leftist station (choo choo!)?
The Spinelli station with that raving ranting Verhoft*** as the Fat Controller?
The "remain but don't even bother reforming, because they don't listen, but I'm fine being a non-country" station?
The soft-remain "oh, they would never force us to adopt the euro, drop the rebate, join their army, despite all efforts to federalise and assimilate at breakneck speed" station?

What station did all the Remainiacs on here vote to pull into, and why do you think you own the tracks that decide the route of the train, once you've agreed to board? When were you ever asked what your destination was?

One thing is sure - with a Remain vote - there IS no "work it out after remaining". As Herr Juncker tells us: "there can be no democratic choice against the European (sic) treaties." It is always "more Europe". You just don't get to choose what that means.

Thank f*** we pulled the emergency stop in time to get off. I'll take the car thanks. It's not stuck on rails to a destination I have no choice and no interest in.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View becky's Profile becky Flag over the moon 31 Jan 19 6.03am Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Tony Blair: The backstop isn't the only flaw in the PM's Brexit deal. She's effectively saying 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'.

We were always promised we'd know the future relationship with the EU before leaving.

But we don't, a few weeks before some type of exit, we just don't have a clue.

It's like moving house, but not knowing where your new address is.

Nobody would do that, but leave would.

So would the conservative party, parliament, the media, and there is no figure to step in and make us see sense.


Were we?

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 1381 of 2586 < 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic