Parish: More incoming
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 JohnB  27 Jan 16 4.53pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Indefatigable
That makes more some sense if FFP restrictions reasons are totally genuine. However we don't seem to shy from giving players better contracts. Although I guess giving say, Souare a contract that earns him an extra (purely a guess for example purposes) £500,000 per year is different from bringing someone in for £1.5m per year. Wouldn't the American money, even though it's ear-marked for stadium plans, count as a bumper increase in turnover though? Increase in turnover can't come from investment by owners, only from revenue streams like merchandising, season ticket sales, player sales etc. However, on the flip side, losses for non playing costs don't count towards FFP too, so you can spend money on the ground and training facilities and it doesn't count towards what's calculated against your FFP quota. *I think*
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| OldFella London 27 Jan 16 6.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by xGeorgex
Out Possibly out In Possibly in Edited by xGeorgex (27 Jan 2016 4.55pm) Wally alert...
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sportyteacher London 27 Jan 16 7.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by OldFella
Wally alert... Err no! These are realistic signings given club position; board & management achievement coupled with realistic aspirations and what we SHOULD be affording given the crazy transfer market TO DATE. I have no doubt that Pardew could bring out the best of these highlighted incoming players as long as they are driven to raise their game within a Palace shirt first & foremost.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
jeeagles  27 Jan 16 7.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by JohnB
Increase in turnover can't come from investment by owners, only from revenue streams like merchandising, season ticket sales, player sales etc. However, on the flip side, losses for non playing costs don't count towards FFP too, so you can spend money on the ground and training facilities and it doesn't count towards what's calculated against your FFP quota. *I think* The club might be trying to break even/turn a profit. So irrespective of the permittable losses in the FFP rules,they may not still be able to invest.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Adamoc123  Ennis 28 Jan 16 11.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by xGeorgex
Out Possibly out In Possibly in Edited by xGeorgex (27 Jan 2016 4.55pm) Way too many changes for my liking, will upset the team chemistry quite a bit with all those transfers in a january window.
The First 90 Minutes Are The Most Important! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lyons550 Shirley 28 Jan 16 12.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by OldFella
Wally alert... Not too far off for me...The only name I'd disagree with would be Dunk coming in...he's shyte. I agree however that it maybe too many
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cpj Kent 28 Jan 16 12.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by xGeorgex
Out Possibly out In Possibly in Edited by xGeorgex (27 Jan 2016 4.55pm) All very well but noone's going to take Chamakh off our hands given his wages / injuries / ineffectiveness. Similarly nobody's going to buy Mutch for anywhere remotely near the £5m that Pardew crazily paid for him.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spaghetti Bolaise Biggin hill 28 Jan 16 12.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cpj
All very well but noone's going to take Chamakh off our hands given his wages / injuries / ineffectiveness. Similarly nobody's going to buy Mutch for anywhere remotely near the £5m that Pardew crazily paid for him. Also selling puncheon would be very stupid!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spaghetti Bolaise Biggin hill 28 Jan 16 12.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cpj
Originally posted by xGeorgex Out All very well but noone's going to take Chamakh off our hands given his wages / injuries / ineffectiveness. Similarly nobody's going to buy Mutch for anywhere remotely near the £5m that Pardew crazily paid for him. Also selling puncheon would be very stupid!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| rob1969 Banstead Surrey 28 Jan 16 1.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Monday is 1st February ! Going to be a very busy weekend then - maybe ?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Percy of Peckham  Eton Mess 28 Jan 16 1.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by xGeorgex
Out Possibly out In Possibly in Edited by xGeorgex (27 Jan 2016 4.55pm) Far too many changes ...our problems would just multiply. For me a couple of goalscorers although I do like the sound of Diame.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cooleagle89  Montrose 28 Jan 16 1.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I was wondering if FFP is a problem for us, what is the situation regarding Bournemouth? They have spent a serious amount money! Originally posted by JohnB
Increase in turnover can't come from investment by owners, only from revenue streams like merchandising, season ticket sales, player sales etc. However, on the flip side, losses for non playing costs don't count towards FFP too, so you can spend money on the ground and training facilities and it doesn't count towards what's calculated against your FFP quota. *I think*
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.