He isn't. Here's Gary Lewin talking about it if you want to learn about them. Starts at 1:10:35

[Link]

"A medical is not to decide if someone is fit to sign or not. A medical is a risk assessment for the club.... Some clubs use a red, green, amber system. We use a 5 point grade system. A grade 5 is a very high risk. A grade 1 is a very low risk. And then we give that back to the club. It's not a yes or no".

0

No such contract exists.

It's a simple term but it's real meaning is the person will get a low set wage lets say 25 thousand and when they play it will bring it in line with every one else so say rest are on 80 thousand.

Many years ago when this first came out the clubs wanted to only pay when they played and it was rejected that if under contract a person should be getting for the league minimum salary.

Some one mentioned about Wilf coming back early or not eased back in this was his choice and I expect it was based on wanting to leave having long periods out doesn't look good also he wants to be the main man (The last few times we looked better without him)

Medicals are tick boxes and then if currently injured it will be accessed and presented for a club/insurance if they will take it on.

I can see Wilf struggling because at Palace he was looked after on every level when Roy returned the first training session Wilf was gassed and had to rest half way through that is not a good sign now he has stepped up to another club they will have different training plus fitness/physical levels which he naturally may not be able to handle.

So a contract offer to a s***e United player 14 years ago is the best you could come up with , you are really clasping at straws to prove a point now .

It's very amusing that you and the other misery are so triggered by this.

You can remove your fingers from the keyboard now. It's OK.