Everton points deduction reduced to 6 points
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 SnapperKain  SE25 6PU 26 Feb 24 1.25pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Thought it would be about that after the appeal, 10 points did seem harsh. Edited by SnapperKain (26 Feb 2024 1.27pm)
The trouble with computers, of course, is that they're very sophisticated idiots |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| silvertop Portishead 26 Feb 24 1.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Good. I thought they would succeed. They spent enough on the most expensive barristers they could find! Still 3 points behind us... and another charge to come. Forest must be quaking.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
The groover  Danbury 26 Feb 24 1.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I heard this over the weekend. I also heard they would get another 6 for the second offence, as would forest, for the their offence.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 26 Feb 24 1.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The following was posted by The Groover at 9 this morning: "Update We also have Everton's appeal and their 2nd case and Forests first. Rumours are that Everton's will be reduced to 6 points but they will get another 6 points, as will forest. You read it here first. Part one. Tick." This means that Everton are still below us and if the rest of the so-called rumour is true things are looking up for us and several other clubs, including Luton.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| RednBlue Eagle Horsham 26 Feb 24 1.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Maybe the barristers costs will put them over budget for the next season!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 26 Feb 24 1.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The groover
I heard this over the weekend. I also heard they would get another 6 for the second offence, as would forest, for the their offence.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 26 Feb 24 1.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What gets me is how idiotic it was to deduct 10 points before any appeal process began. Surely it would have been fairer to everyone if the original deduction was suspended until the process was complete. So what happens with Forest? Do they get a 6 point deduction only for it to be reduced right at the end of the season? Utterly absurd. What ever is going to happen must happy very quickly in the interests of fair competition. There are only around a dozen games left for every club.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| beak croydon 26 Feb 24 1.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What gets me is how idiotic it was to deduct 10 points before any appeal process began. Surely it would have been fairer to everyone if the original deduction was suspended until the process was complete. So what happens with Forest? Do they get a 6 point deduction only for it to be reduced right at the end of the season? Utterly absurd. What ever is going to happen must happy very quickly in the interests of fair competition. There are only around a dozen games left for every club. That's far too sensible,this is the F.A. y'now.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 26 Feb 24 1.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What gets me is how idiotic it was to deduct 10 points before any appeal process began. Surely it would have been fairer to everyone if the original deduction was suspended until the process was complete. So what happens with Forest? Do they get a 6 point deduction only for it to be reduced right at the end of the season? Utterly absurd. What ever is going to happen must happy very quickly in the interests of fair competition. There are only around a dozen games left for every club. Not how it works. As with all adjudication, the original decision stands unless overturned on appeal. As for Forest/Everton#2, the decisions should be based on the merits. These may demonstrate e.g. a far more flagrant breach justifying a harsher sentence; or otherwise. No idea. Thus, 6 points should not be the default sentence. And as for the time taken, I do agree, but these are new rules and procedures. They are still finding their way through it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MrRobbo Purley 26 Feb 24 1.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
6 points is still good for us, keeps another club between us and the drop!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
eagleman13  On The Road To Hell & Alicante 26 Feb 24 2.11pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
Not how it works. As with all adjudication, the original decision stands unless overturned on appeal. As for Forest/Everton#2, the decisions should be based on the merits. These may demonstrate e.g. a far more flagrant breach justifying a harsher sentence; or otherwise. No idea. Thus, 6 points should not be the default sentence. And as for the time taken, I do agree, but these are new rules and procedures. They are still finding their way through it. Agree with this. I honestly believe Everton will get another 6 point deduction(along with Forest) but, also could be given a 2-3 point deduction as a repeat offence. The next hearing has to be done by April 8th(bbc sport).
I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold, |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 26 Feb 24 2.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
Agree with this. I honestly believe Everton will get another 6 point deduction(along with Forest) but, also could be given a 2-3 point deduction as a repeat offence. The next hearing has to be done by April 8th(bbc sport). Repeat offences generally mean harsher sentences, not more lenient ones.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.