You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > one less to blow us up
April 27 2024 11.53pm

one less to blow us up

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 8 of 16 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

 

legaleagle Flag 16 Jun 15 10.42pm

Ok,so basically you've never known any muslims personally well enough to form an idea of what any individuals are actually like as parents or people.

How would you "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures?

And how would you differentiate between the minority of "extremists" and the vast numbers of non extremists (or do you draw no such distinction)?

Edited by legaleagle (16 Jun 2015 10.42pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View TUX's Profile TUX Flag redhill 16 Jun 15 10.43pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote derben at 16 Jun 2015 10.24pm

Quote TUX at 16 Jun 2015 10.09pm

Quote derben at 16 Jun 2015 9.50pm

Quote TUX at 16 Jun 2015 9.38pm

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 9.11pm

Quote derben at 16 Jun 2015 5.37pm

It is pointless comparing how indigenous non-Muslim people bring their kids up with how Muslims do. The have a very different set of 'values' and are religion-ridden. It is like a country within a country. We need to maintain diplomatic relations but be on guard.

Edited by derben (16 Jun 2015 5.37pm)


What precisely are your proposed solutions for seeking to reduce the number of impressionable "under age kids" or "young adults" in this country falling for IS' nonsense,and why in your view would they be likely to be both achievable and effective?


Derben makes a post about a lone rider.
Derben is Hols 'tabloid'.
Derben has no answers.

We should I, a member of 'the wider community', be expected to solve the problem of "impressionable under age kids' or young adults" going off to assist in the beheading and burning alive of people. Perhaps if the various Muslim spokesmen that appear in the media blaming the police, teachers and 'the wider community', spent more time on putting their house in order, it might help. However, at least they are leaving this country, hopefully never to return, which lessens the ever present possibility of them manifesting their 'impressionability' here.

You chose to mention a native causing mayhem abroad.
I guess I missed your similar thread regarding Blair.
Or is that a work in progress.............?


LOL, and you say I have no answers!

.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 17 Jun 15 8.06am

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 10.42pm

Ok,so basically you've never known any muslims personally well enough to form an idea of what any individuals are actually like as parents or people.

How would you "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures?

And how would you differentiate between the minority of "extremists" and the vast numbers of non extremists (or do you draw no such distinction)?

Edited by legaleagle (16 Jun 2015 10.42pm)

You do love to try to put your words in my mouth. I've worked with Muslims in the past. Haven't socialised with them much, they don't go down the pub, they don't go in the bookies, they don't go to churches, don't see them at football matches or at the races, they tend to patronise other Muslims' businesses. I did try to say 'good morning' the other day to a Muslim couple in a lift in Birmingham - but just got silent glares back.

How would I "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures? Longer prison sentences for convicted terrorist offenders, shut down mosques where jihad is preached. Deport trouble making imported mullahs. Shut down schools where radicalisation is proved. Prosecute the likes of Moazann Begg, and other apologists, for support of terrorism. (While we are at it, stop ignoring organised child abuse if it happens to be conducted by Muslims). This would be a good start; I expect I and other HOLers could come up with some extras.

How do you differentiate? The more extreme Muslims tend to shout Allah Snack-Bar at lot and call for the death of British troops, Tony Blair and all infidels etc.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 17 Jun 15 8.36am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 9.11pm

Quote derben at 16 Jun 2015 5.37pm

It is pointless comparing how indigenous non-Muslim people bring their kids up with how Muslims do. The have a very different set of 'values' and are religion-ridden. It is like a country within a country. We need to maintain diplomatic relations but be on guard.

Edited by derben (16 Jun 2015 5.37pm)


What precisely are your proposed solutions for seeking to reduce the number of impressionable "under age kids" or "young adults" in this country falling for IS' nonsense,and why in your view would they be likely to be both achievable and effective?

"if" children brought up against an Islamic background are more susceptible to being brainwashed into blowing them selves up etc. etc, that says two things to me, 1, the family structure within that Childs life must be shockingly devoid of any true nurturing by the parents (so the child finds it in the arms of a nutcase from ISIS), and two that any religion that pre disposes itself, and or makes it young followers targets for brain washers has to be inherently flawed and therefore wrong.

It is the Job of a parent to protect and nurture their children is it not ? if that is the case you have to ask yourself if there is a chance that by following that (archaic) religion you run the risk of your children, wife, partner, becoming so disenfranchised with life in general, (primarily because of the values and standards of that religion) that they bugger off half way round the world to kill themselves and others in the process, The question has to be, why would you be part of that religion ?

I’m not so naive as to think that all Muslims are swivel eyed loons who cant wait to put on a semtex over coat, however, if one of my little girls said she wanted to be a Buddhist...sure baby no problem. However if she said daddy I’m off down the mosque in Fort Neath.....? Are you fcuk as like, here have a pony instead.

I know I've simplified the problem, but it really is a simple problem if you don’t want to run the risk of your kids running off to blow themselves up, don’t follow Islam, then you have negated the risk. Simple risk management.


Edited by dannyh (17 Jun 2015 8.46am)

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 17 Jun 15 8.57am

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 8.06am

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 10.42pm

Ok,so basically you've never known any muslims personally well enough to form an idea of what any individuals are actually like as parents or people.

How would you "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures?

And how would you differentiate between the minority of "extremists" and the vast numbers of non extremists (or do you draw no such distinction)?

Edited by legaleagle (16 Jun 2015 10.42pm)

You do love to try to put your words in my mouth. I've worked with Muslims in the past. Haven't socialised with them much, they don't go down the pub, they don't go in the bookies, they don't go to churches, don't see them at football matches or at the races, they tend to patronise other Muslims' businesses. I did try to say 'good morning' the other day to a Muslim couple in a lift in Birmingham - but just got silent glares back.

How would I "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures? Longer prison sentences for convicted terrorist offenders, shut down mosques where jihad is preached. Deport trouble making imported mullahs. Shut down schools where radicalisation is proved. Prosecute the likes of Moazann Begg, and other apologists, for support of terrorism. (While we are at it, stop ignoring organised child abuse if it happens to be conducted by Muslims). This would be a good start; I expect I and other HOLers could come up with some extras.

How do you differentiate? The more extreme Muslims tend to shout Allah Snack-Bar at lot and call for the death of British troops, Tony Blair and all infidels etc.


Based on some of the cases I've come across in my work,the people you really want to worry about keep a really low profile,don't mouth off anything in an outsider's presence and operate "under the radar",just like people you might want to really worry about of any "extreme" persuasion.They are quite different very often from people of a particular religion who are very devout.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View serial thriller's Profile serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 17 Jun 15 9.11am Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 8.06am

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 10.42pm

Ok,so basically you've never known any muslims personally well enough to form an idea of what any individuals are actually like as parents or people.

How would you "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures?

And how would you differentiate between the minority of "extremists" and the vast numbers of non extremists (or do you draw no such distinction)?

Edited by legaleagle (16 Jun 2015 10.42pm)

You do love to try to put your words in my mouth. I've worked with Muslims in the past. Haven't socialised with them much, they don't go down the pub, they don't go in the bookies, they don't go to churches, don't see them at football matches or at the races, they tend to patronise other Muslims' businesses. I did try to say 'good morning' the other day to a Muslim couple in a lift in Birmingham - but just got silent glares back.

How would I "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures? Longer prison sentences for convicted terrorist offenders, shut down mosques where jihad is preached. Deport trouble making imported mullahs. Shut down schools where radicalisation is proved. Prosecute the likes of Moazann Begg, and other apologists, for support of terrorism. (While we are at it, stop ignoring organised child abuse if it happens to be conducted by Muslims). This would be a good start; I expect I and other HOLers could come up with some extras.

How do you differentiate? The more extreme Muslims tend to shout Allah Snack-Bar at lot and call for the death of British troops, Tony Blair and all infidels etc.


See this post to me just seems to demonstrate the breathtaking ignorance most of the population has towards Islam. Whenever there is a demonised group, the first thing that people seem to do is reduce their factual knowledge of said group to the bare bones, thus making it easier to make up bullsh*t stories and truisms about said group.

Jihad is the term used for the struggle Muslims go to continue their faith. Now this can of course manifest itself violently, as Al-Qaeda and IS are testament to. But it also means the inner struggle to uphold the virtues of Islam, which the vast majority of Muslims consider to be peaceful, caring and trusting from my experience. Therefore, to call on all Mosques preaching Jihad to be closed down is to call for every single mosque in this country to close its doors. Now I'm sure, secretly, you'd be just fine with that, but if you have any shred of respect for civil liberties you'll realise that's a bit fascist.

Allah Akbar literally means 'God is the greatest'. If you're using that as a basis for identifying radical Muslims, I'm sure you could pop in to a church and round up all the Christians saying a similar thing.

The rest of your post is mainly unreasonable hyperbole. 'Shut down schools where radicalisation is proved'. What is proof? A picture of Bin Laden on the wall and Jihadi John taking maths lessons? And what do you do with the hundreds of kids who have their school shut down, just leave them to sit at home playing FIFA all day?

And why the f*ck should we arrest Moazann Begg? He's gone through the British judicial system and been found to have done nothing against the law, so are you now a higher authority than British courts?

Like I say, scapegoating produces ignorance, and ignorance produces panic. What really gets me though is that our very own government are approaching the issue of radical Islam with a similar mentality to Derben. I know very little about Islam but rather than being immediately hostile to it, I've attempted to learn a bit about it. I went to a mosque the other day and have never experienced such friendly people in my life, all coming up to me and my mate and chatting, having a laugh, and generally showing two white guys a respect which two Muslims could never dream of getting were they to walk in to a church. I strongly encourage others to do likewise and see first hand what the majority of Muslims are like.

Edited by serial thriller (17 Jun 2015 9.14am)

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 17 Jun 15 9.30am

Quote dannyh at 17 Jun 2015 8.36am

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 9.11pm

Quote derben at 16 Jun 2015 5.37pm

It is pointless comparing how indigenous non-Muslim people bring their kids up with how Muslims do. The have a very different set of 'values' and are religion-ridden. It is like a country within a country. We need to maintain diplomatic relations but be on guard.

Edited by derben (16 Jun 2015 5.37pm)


What precisely are your proposed solutions for seeking to reduce the number of impressionable "under age kids" or "young adults" in this country falling for IS' nonsense,and why in your view would they be likely to be both achievable and effective?

"if" children brought up against an Islamic background are more susceptible to being brainwashed into blowing them selves up etc. etc, that says two things to me, 1, the family structure within that Childs life must be shockingly devoid of any true nurturing by the parents (so the child finds it in the arms of a nutcase from ISIS), and two that any religion that pre disposes itself, and or makes it young followers targets for brain washers has to be inherently flawed and therefore wrong.

It is the Job of a parent to protect and nurture their children is it not ? if that is the case you have to ask yourself if there is a chance that by following that (archaic) religion you run the risk of your children, wife, partner, becoming so disenfranchised with life in general, (primarily because of the values and standards of that religion) that they bugger off half way round the world to kill themselves and others in the process, The question has to be, why would you be part of that religion ?

I’m not so naive as to think that all Muslims are swivel eyed loons who cant wait to put on a semtex over coat, however, if one of my little girls said she wanted to be a Buddhist...sure baby no problem. However if she said daddy I’m off down the mosque in Fort Neath.....? Are you fcuk as like, here have a pony instead.

I know I've simplified the problem, but it really is a simple problem if you don’t want to run the risk of your kids running off to blow themselves up, don’t follow Islam, then you have negated the risk. Simple risk management.


Edited by dannyh (17 Jun 2015 8.46am)

You make the assumption that it is following the religion that predisposes people to becoming "disenfranchised with life in general"...that's quite an assumption...

5 muslim people where I work.All very different,ranging from very religious to pretty much agnostic.

Range in "views" from tory voter to socialist to a political "islamist".The latter takes his son to watch Palace.He grew up in the W Midlands,regularly experiencing the delights of being on the receiving end of gratuitous "p*k* -bashing" then so popular as a local pastime for the "indigenous non muslims"back in the 70's. I completely disagree with his views,though to be honest no more than I do derben's general views about people of a different race,ethnicity or religion.

Another is one of the "sweetest" people you'd ever meet.Geordie woman,spends much of her spare time doing charity work.Abhors violence of any kind.Her mum is an avid Newcastle fan.

3 are parents.Very hands-on, loving, caring parents.Kids doing really well in school/uni.

Suppose the point is,when you stop demonising "muslims" as a general group (est 2.71 million in the UK as of 2011),people are about as different and varied in how they are as any other religious group.Funnily enough,generally they're just people like you and me,good and bad.

Bit like Catholics in N Ireland...or baptists in the American south.

Just a snapshot based on one person's personal experiences...

In work terms,have come across some extremely "dodgy" jihadi types in cases I've been involved in...came across some pretty dodgy types connected with N Ireland,who happened to be Catholics, but that wasn't the key causal factor.Come across plenty of dodgy "indigenous non muslims",to use derben's delightful term,including people who neglect their kids,and engage in gratuitous violence,or their kids do.

I don't claim to have answers but I suspect the question of why kids run off to join ISIS is a little more complex...

Edited by legaleagle (17 Jun 2015 9.39am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 17 Jun 15 9.58am

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 9.11am

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 8.06am

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 10.42pm

Ok,so basically you've never known any muslims personally well enough to form an idea of what any individuals are actually like as parents or people.

How would you "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures?

And how would you differentiate between the minority of "extremists" and the vast numbers of non extremists (or do you draw no such distinction)?

Edited by legaleagle (16 Jun 2015 10.42pm)

You do love to try to put your words in my mouth. I've worked with Muslims in the past. Haven't socialised with them much, they don't go down the pub, they don't go in the bookies, they don't go to churches, don't see them at football matches or at the races, they tend to patronise other Muslims' businesses. I did try to say 'good morning' the other day to a Muslim couple in a lift in Birmingham - but just got silent glares back.

How would I "crack down" harder in terms of actual measures? Longer prison sentences for convicted terrorist offenders, shut down mosques where jihad is preached. Deport trouble making imported mullahs. Shut down schools where radicalisation is proved. Prosecute the likes of Moazann Begg, and other apologists, for support of terrorism. (While we are at it, stop ignoring organised child abuse if it happens to be conducted by Muslims). This would be a good start; I expect I and other HOLers could come up with some extras.

How do you differentiate? The more extreme Muslims tend to shout Allah Snack-Bar at lot and call for the death of British troops, Tony Blair and all infidels etc.


See this post to me just seems to demonstrate the breathtaking ignorance most of the population has towards Islam. Whenever there is a demonised group, the first thing that people seem to do is reduce their factual knowledge of said group to the bare bones, thus making it easier to make up bullsh*t stories and truisms about said group.

Jihad is the term used for the struggle Muslims go to continue their faith. Now this can of course manifest itself violently, as Al-Qaeda and IS are testament to. But it also means the inner struggle to uphold the virtues of Islam, which the vast majority of Muslims consider to be peaceful, caring and trusting from my experience. Therefore, to call on all Mosques preaching Jihad to be closed down is to call for every single mosque in this country to close its doors. Now I'm sure, secretly, you'd be just fine with that, but if you have any shred of respect for civil liberties you'll realise that's a bit fascist.

Allah Akbar literally means 'God is the greatest'. If you're using that as a basis for identifying radical Muslims, I'm sure you could pop in to a church and round up all the Christians saying a similar thing.

The rest of your post is mainly unreasonable hyperbole. 'Shut down schools where radicalisation is proved'. What is proof? A picture of Bin Laden on the wall and Jihadi John taking maths lessons? And what do you do with the hundreds of kids who have their school shut down, just leave them to sit at home playing FIFA all day?

And why the f*ck should we arrest Moazann Begg? He's gone through the British judicial system and been found to have done nothing against the law, so are you now a higher authority than British courts?

Like I say, scapegoating produces ignorance, and ignorance produces panic. What really gets me though is that our very own government are approaching the issue of radical Islam with a similar mentality to Derben. I know very little about Islam but rather than being immediately hostile to it, I've attempted to learn a bit about it. I went to a mosque the other day and have never experienced such friendly people in my life, all coming up to me and my mate and chatting, having a laugh, and generally showing two white guys a respect which two Muslims could never dream of getting were they to walk in to a church. I strongly encourage others to do likewise and see first hand what the majority of Muslims are like.

Edited by serial thriller (17 Jun 2015 9.14am)

Very happy to change 'jihad' to one of its meanings, ie: "a war or struggle against unbelievers". Moazaam Begg is a best an apologist for Islamic terrorism, and at worst a terrorist himself. Presumably you think John Terry should not have been fined and banned for using the word 'black' after being found not guilty by a British court?

As for common and garden Islam, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. There are people who dislike Islam and will continue to dislike it no matter what fatuous legislation is enacted. They dislike it for perfectly good, rational, reasons: honour murders, female genital mutilation, Sharia courts, rampant postal vote fraud, trojan horse schools, hate preachers, anti-gay laws (including the death penalty), anti-women laws, anti-apostate laws (including the death penalty, anti-Semitism, etc.corrupt civil administration,
grooming gangs in dozens of cities etc etc etc


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 9.59am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 17 Jun 15 10.00am

I'd suggest that the solution isn't to crack down harder on Muslim extremists, because that makes them harder to infiltrate and more security conscious when up to no good (not all extremists are terrorists, you can hold radical views without promoting terrorism).

Where terrorists cells are discovered they have to be eliminated, either judicially in the UK, or extra judicially, with a view to minimizing fall out with host nations.

Meanwhile, we also need to identify problems within our own society that incite extremists and create alienation of the Muslim population, particularly young Muslim men, and move to counter those problems and concerns in a reasonable manner (you'll always have Islamists and extremists, similar to how you'll always have people who demand a united Ireland, but you can marginalize those groups, by resolving the issues creating support for them).

We ultimately have to accept that Muslims, and Muslim belief, is part of the UK culture, and in order to encourage greater interaction, we may need to ourselves make some concessions.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 17 Jun 15 10.00am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 17 Jun 2015 9.30am

Quote dannyh at 17 Jun 2015 8.36am

Quote legaleagle at 16 Jun 2015 9.11pm

Quote derben at 16 Jun 2015 5.37pm

It is pointless comparing how indigenous non-Muslim people bring their kids up with how Muslims do. The have a very different set of 'values' and are religion-ridden. It is like a country within a country. We need to maintain diplomatic relations but be on guard.

Edited by derben (16 Jun 2015 5.37pm)


What precisely are your proposed solutions for seeking to reduce the number of impressionable "under age kids" or "young adults" in this country falling for IS' nonsense,and why in your view would they be likely to be both achievable and effective?

"if" children brought up against an Islamic background are more susceptible to being brainwashed into blowing them selves up etc. etc, that says two things to me, 1, the family structure within that Childs life must be shockingly devoid of any true nurturing by the parents (so the child finds it in the arms of a nutcase from ISIS), and two that any religion that pre disposes itself, and or makes it young followers targets for brain washers has to be inherently flawed and therefore wrong.

It is the Job of a parent to protect and nurture their children is it not ? if that is the case you have to ask yourself if there is a chance that by following that (archaic) religion you run the risk of your children, wife, partner, becoming so disenfranchised with life in general, (primarily because of the values and standards of that religion) that they bugger off half way round the world to kill themselves and others in the process, The question has to be, why would you be part of that religion ?

I’m not so naive as to think that all Muslims are swivel eyed loons who cant wait to put on a semtex over coat, however, if one of my little girls said she wanted to be a Buddhist...sure baby no problem. However if she said daddy I’m off down the mosque in Fort Neath.....? Are you fcuk as like, here have a pony instead.

I know I've simplified the problem, but it really is a simple problem if you don’t want to run the risk of your kids running off to blow themselves up, don’t follow Islam, then you have negated the risk. Simple risk management.


Edited by dannyh (17 Jun 2015 8.46am)

You make the assumption that it is following the religion that predisposes people to becoming "disenfranchised with life in general"...that's quite an assumption...

5 muslim people where I work.All very different,ranging from very religious to pretty much agnostic.

Range in "views" from tory voter to socialist to a political "islamist".The latter takes his son to watch Palace.He grew up in the W Midlands,regularly experiencing the delights of being on the receiving end of gratuitous "p*k* -bashing" then so popular as a local pastime for the "indigenous non muslims"back in the 70's. I completely disagree with his views,though to be honest no more than I do derben's general views about people of a different race,ethnicity or religion.

Another is one of the "sweetest" people you'd ever meet.Geordie woman,spends much of her spare time doing charity work.Abhors violence of any kind.Her mum is an avid Newcastle fan.

3 are parents.Very hands-on, loving, caring parents.Kids doing really well in school/uni.

Suppose the point is,when you stop demonising "muslims" as a general group (est 2.71 million in the UK as of 2011),people are about as different and varied in how they are as any other religious group.Funnily enough,generally they're just people like you and me,good and bad.

Bit like Catholics in N Ireland...or baptists in the American south.

Just a snapshot based on one person's personal experiences...

In work terms,have come across some extremely "dodgy" jihadi types in cases I've been involved in...came across some pretty dodgy types connected with N Ireland,who happened to be Catholics, but that wasn't the key causal factor.Come across plenty of dodgy "indigenous non muslims",to use derben's delightful term,including people who neglect their kids,and engage in gratuitous violence,or their kids do.

I don't claim to have answers but I suspect the question of why kids run off to join ISIS is a little more complex...

Edited by legaleagle (17 Jun 2015 9.39am)


All very well written and you make some good points (as always) however you are skilfully (again as ever) avoiding grasping the nettle of my "theory" for want of a better word, that if you do not follow Islam your chances of your wife, Husband, (or worse) child, running off to blow them selves up (and others) with carefree abandon is reduced.

No matter how you dress it up that surely is an inarguable fact?

As I said, I am not saying that every Muslim Parent is an uncaring or a bad parent, some are. Bad parenting happens across all walks of life and in all races and religions (unless of course you believe Diane Abbott then all West Indian women are aces parents), but the fall out from being a bad parent from a Christian back ground, is not going to be a suicide bomber or a ISIS fighter is it ?

Whilst no smoke without fire is a massively sweeping statement, there is this case more than an element of truth to it.


Edited by dannyh (17 Jun 2015 10.01am)

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View reborn's Profile reborn 17 Jun 15 10.04am Send a Private Message to reborn Add reborn as a friend

100 agree with Dan

 


My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Sash's Profile The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 17 Jun 15 10.58am Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Jun 2015 4.36pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 15 Jun 2015 4.29pm

Quote The Sash at 15 Jun 2015 3.36pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 15 Jun 2015 3.26pm

Quote The Sash at 15 Jun 2015 2.47pm

Quote derben at 15 Jun 2015 2.39pm

Imam Farooq Yunus, of the Zakaria Mosque in Savile Town, where the boys attended religious school, said they had been let down by the system. He said: “I think we have failed. Not just the people in here – the whole system - the council, the police, the community. The society have failed these two children and somehow we should put things in place where if they do feel strongly, they know what to do. “The fault lies in the wider community where we are not engaging with them.”

This is what is called 'the narrative' these days. These young men attended a religious school, ie: Islamic school where they no doubt received guidance in how to live the life of a peace loving, tolerant and progressive Muslim. Yet it is apparently the fault of the council, the police and 'the wider community (ie: non-Muslims) that they became homicidal maniacs. Of course, when people such as the teachers, police and 'the wider community' try to stop Islamic indoctrination they are branded as Anti-Islam racists.

Meanwhile the wonderful concept of multi-culturalism carries on regardless, ensuring that the UK is split into a plethora of separate 'communities' which are largely closed to each other and which each have different and conflicting views of how we should live. These two terrorists came from a community which is devoted to an ideology which demands that all who are born into it cannot abandon it and must obey it and propagate it wherever they go, against this, the 'wider community' is an irrelevance.

Edited by derben (15 Jun 2015 2.44pm)

These are such easy statements to make aren't they?

The question to throw back at this obvious imbecile are quite simply 'HOW have the council, police, community and society 'failed' them ?

...or are you just a f~*cking apologist'

Firstly, what are the council supposed to do?

Secondly, the police would be accused of institutional racism if they got involved.

Thirdly, how are the 'wider community' supposed to help when the immediate community do not integrate?

Perhaps the mosque should take a closer look at themselves rather than blame every other c*nt for their students deciding to travel thousands of miles to grow a beard & blow up a building.


It wasn't even a very good beard either was it SE ??

Very patchy. The seventy two virgins will not be impressed with the wispy chin pubes.

Those blokes have been waiting all eternity to pop their cherry, they won't worry about whispy chin pubes


72 virgins...these Muslim suicide bombers must be really pissed when they ascend only to find they are in a male only Star Trek convention

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 8 of 16 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > one less to blow us up