Britain First
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
leggedstruggle  Croydon 08 Oct 15 5.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am) Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo. The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there. I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist. Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.
I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.
2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'. 3) He disappeared so no chance. 'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it. Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.
My aunt, uncle and cousins do. You have no idea of the mayhem and terror caused by the little darlings you champion. All you do is vilify the police trying to protect people and property (but of course property is theft isn't it?). Scarman was a Liberal - say no more.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
. Hrolf The Ganger 08 Oct 15 5.56pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
I try to give a person helpful advice and this is what I get.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
Kermit8  Hevon 08 Oct 15 6.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.56pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am) Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo. The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there. I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist. Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.
I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.
2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'. 3) He disappeared so no chance. 'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it. Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.
My aunt, uncle and cousins do. You have no idea of the mayhem and terror caused by the little darlings you champion. All you do is vilify the police trying to protect people and property (but of course property is theft isn't it?). Scarman was a Liberal - say no more.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 08 Oct 15 6.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 6.05pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.56pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am) Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo. The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there. I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist. Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.
I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.
2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'. 3) He disappeared so no chance. 'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it. Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.
My aunt, uncle and cousins do. You have no idea of the mayhem and terror caused by the little darlings you champion. All you do is vilify the police trying to protect people and property (but of course property is theft isn't it?). Scarman was a Liberal - say no more.
'a couple of miles away' - that must have been exciting for you watching it on TV. Bit different from having to barricade your house and fight off 'oppressed' mininorites trying to rob and kill you, while shouting racial abuse of course. But you know, keep on looking at things through your red-tinted glasses, I doubt you will suffer similar enrichment in Devon.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 08 Oct 15 6.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.43pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 5.27pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 5.12pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 4.59pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 4.54pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 11.41am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 08 Oct 2015 11.23am
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 10.42am
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.21am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Oct 2015 4.29am) Violence, or the threat of violence, is sometimes necessary for the greater good, against people who have begun implementing and turning their extreme views into action imo. The SPG v Brixton/South London youth in 1981 springs to mind. As do the assassination of Heydrich and having to front up my cvnt of a neighbour a few years back There really is no limit to the fatuousness of your 'views' is there. I disagree, when faced with violence, usually the only viable response is to answer in kind. I've never started trouble but I don't believe in shying away from bullys, thugs and intimidation either. It should never be your first choice or solution, but often the only response is to stand firm and make a fist. Of course everyone who says violence is justified only mean it is justified by people whose aims they agree with. To say the 1981 Brixton riots were justified is merely the rewriting of history to glorify a sordid event carried out by yobs egged on by left wing agitators. Come on, why not go on to glorify Broadwater - glorify thugs trying to put a policeman's head on a stick.
I had family in the area at the time. They told me exactly what went on. They moved away eventually - got fed up with being mugged and the constant racial harassment. You speak for the rest of the HOL posters do you then? By the way, would love to hear your neighbour's side of the story.
2) In this instance, if they know their South London history, 'yes'. 3) He disappeared so no chance. 'Do some proper research'. LOL, I know people who were there! Nothing will shake your belief in left wing fairy tales will it. Perhaps other HOL posters can indicate as to whether the sage of Devon speaks for them.
Edited by Cucking Funt (08 Oct 2015 6.15pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 08 Oct 15 6.24pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am
Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 08 Oct 15 6.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.24pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am
Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 08 Oct 15 6.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I lived at Stockwell Park Estate as a child. I was there as a 12 year old at the time and watched some of it from the safety of a high rise balcony window. Those who refer to any justifications are in my view talking out of their rear ends. I would be surprised if anyone with any decency partook in those riots. The people I watched were just opportunistic thugs.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 08 Oct 15 6.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 6.32pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.24pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am
Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.
'As a default means'. I included the word 'default' to mean in normal circumstances.....The systematic mass murder of street protesters is a different ball game.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 08 Oct 15 7.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.42pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 6.32pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.24pm
Quote Kermit8 at 08 Oct 2015 10.36am
Quote DanH at 08 Oct 2015 10.31am
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 4.26am
Nothing wrong with moderate peaceful nationalism: It's the heartbeat of a nation. However, violence and its support should always be rejected as a default means of combating views/people you don't agree with.
My attitude towards how I respond to you change radically once you start killing my people.
'As a default means'. I included the word 'default' to mean in normal circumstances.....The systematic mass murder of street protesters is a different ball game. NOTE : Does not include peaceful Palestinain protest.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 08 Oct 15 7.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Stirlingsays at 08 Oct 2015 6.39pm
I lived at Stockwell Park Estate as a child. I was there as a 12 year old at the time and watched some of it from the safety of a high rise balcony window. Those who refer to any justifications are in my view talking out of their rear ends. I would be surprised if anyone with any decency partook in those riots. The people I watched were just opportunistic thugs. Doesn't matter what eye-witness accounts you give the likes of K, they will still hero-worship the scumbags and come up with absurd justifications. Nothing shakes their faith in their politically correct nonsense.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 08 Oct 15 7.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
When they kick at your front door
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.