Dressing up ? Certain posters ?

A little bit of hypocrisy there.

I don't dress up anything. Here it is plain and simple.
There is a tenancy among people like you to justify one wrong by highlighting another. That is an argument of the worst and most self serving kind.
To say multi culture is desirable or undesirable is irrelevant in so much as it is what those cultures bring that is the issue. To indirectly defend homophobia or sexual inequality because it challenges a precious liberal concept like multi culture is simply putting zealous ideology over reality. And then to say that white culture already has those prejudices is the most infantile argument imaginable. What is wrong is wrong and if you uphold a moral concept you must be consistant.

Thanks for the compliments.But,I remain unimpressed and must respectfully disagree with your analysis and the "world view" (zealous ideology?) it represents. You very much IMO filter "reality" through the narrow prism of your particular prejudices, certainly no less than any you criticise. You are about as "objective" as the referee against Man U last week!

Hypocrisy is very much in the eye of the beholder as are "infantilism" ,acting in a "self-serving" manner and "zealous ideology".

Not long ago,on another thread you argued cultural separation as a principle was desirable.Now,as a principle, its "irrelevant".Please don't lecture me about consistency.

As for suggesting I have defended homophobia or sexual inequality in my posts on this thread,whether indirectly or otherwise, I'm afraid IMHO you are veering right into the realms of fantasy land.

Edited by legaleagle (16 May 2015 10.58am)

Of course not, that would be a very silly attitude - like you implying that the BNP represent "our culture". I guess the Judeo-Christian civilisation can sleep easier now that we know that you have "not been backwards at condemning such "elements"

Here is an interesting view on these matters.
[Link]

Edited by derben (16 May 2015 11.19am)

Similarly why did you ask if I 'consider "these elements" to consist by any chance,of the entire muslim population of the UK' ?

Edited by derben (16 May 2015 11.23am)

So a highly intelligent and erudite legal person like you good self thought it possible that someone would think that the entire Muslim population of the UK was in favour of the total destruction of Judeo-Christian civilisation. What is your legal status by the way - court clerk or something, man on the door that searches 'elements' for bombs?

Edited by derben (16 May 2015 11.38am)

Funnily enough,there are those in this world with that view, in my experience.Some of them style themselves as being erudite and intelligent.Some may even be lawyers (shock horror!).

Delighted you are not one of them.

My "legal status" all too often is the person who listens to people make silly attempts at "humour" and "cutting remarks"!

Edited by legaleagle (16 May 2015 11.43am)