Olise Injury
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 27 Jul 23 6.17pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hudsoneagle
If that is the case, and the release clause is only to champions league clubs, then there is a good chance this doesn’t happen at all. At £35m, most European clubs will be ruled out. PSG stand out as a possible destination. In England, I can’t see it. Newcastle have higher priorities and are working under their FFP issues…the same goes for M.United. Arsenal don’t seem to need him in the first team. City…maybe. But I’m not sold. And again, if this is the detail in the release clause, why is it even being mentioned in connection to Chelsea? That makes about 100 websites full of s***e in the past week. I'm just guessing as if it were a straight forward release clause and Chelsea wanted him, I feel it would be more definite. The other issue, of course, is his injury. My guess is October before he plays, maybe later. And he's unlikely to be at full tilt as it is.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Eaglecoops  CR3 27 Jul 23 8.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jacey
Sincerely hope you are right but so many articles appearing confirming that the £35m release clause remains in place. Saying the same wrong thing a thousand times doesn’t make it right and we all know that the click bait articles are mostly regurgitated/re-worded stories such is the state of lazy journalism in this country. I could virtually guarantee that if a group of us posted separately on several websites that we had agreed a deal for a certain player it would appear in the news shortly after.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Elpis In a pub 27 Jul 23 9.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Well if young Micheal is as good as we all think he is we wont be holding on to him for too much longer . The injury would suggest he wont be going anywhere till January though selling now has its benefits , but for my money Summer 24 would seem logical
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eritheagle Erith 27 Jul 23 10.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I'm just guessing as if it were a straight forward release clause and Chelsea wanted him, I feel it would be more definite. The other issue, of course, is his injury. My guess is October before he plays, maybe later. And he's unlikely to be at full tilt as it is. There is no longer a release clause in his contract. Was removed as part of his new and improved contract last year!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Aray South London 27 Jul 23 11.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eritheagle
There is no longer a release clause in his contract. Was removed as part of his new and improved contract last year! This is what I thought to be the case. Personally I think sell him. He’s good but not as important as Eze - we need to keep him.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dreamwaverider London 27 Jul 23 11.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Aray
This is what I thought to be the case. Personally I think sell him. He’s good but not as important as Eze - we need to keep him. Based on the new wave of values we should be doing what Brighton do. Put him in the shop window then hold him back for the coming season. Let him go next summer. Assuming no release clause then he will be up nearer double the suggested release clause by then.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Glazier#1 28 Jul 23 11.20am |
|
|---|---|
|
I see BBC are, again, reporting interest in Michael from the Arse. They're quoting an estimation of 45m. Yeah, walk on, Gooners. If he's going, you can start the bidding at 65m. Trying to get such talent on the cheap - the cheek of it. If you can believe these reports, of course.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 28 Jul 23 11.24am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Glazier#1
I see BBC are, again, reporting interest in Michael from the Arse. They're quoting an estimation of 45m. Yeah, walk on, Gooners. If he's going, you can start the bidding at 65m. Trying to get such talent on the cheap - the cheek of it. If you can believe these reports, of course. Exactly, we would never do such a thing
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Glazier#1 28 Jul 23 12.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
When I think of how we were stitched up, price-wise by Liddypool over Blunteke and Mama.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 28 Jul 23 12.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The issue is though Olise wants to go. I've also heard Guehi would like a move but I'm not in the know. Guehi is apparently somewhat happy to trust the club to set the price. Olise is not the same. Stupid rumours I'm hearing.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Glazier#1 28 Jul 23 12.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
We should play hard ball. Olise is the real, real deal and they know it. Even if he wants to go, we play hard ball and let them fight it out. No reason we have to be pussycats - to put it politely.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Jacey 28 Jul 23 12.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
The issue is though Olise wants to go. I've also heard Guehi would like a move but I'm not in the know. Guehi is apparently somewhat happy to trust the club to set the price. Olise is not the same. Stupid rumours I'm hearing. Selling the family silver without adequate,appropriate replacements means one thing: The wealthiest club in the Championship.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.