Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 12 Aug 23 5.54pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Rushed? It's expected to take 4 years and will probably be longer. The time will be spent undoing the damage to the NHS created by a situation supposedly designed to protect it. Frankly, so what? Better that than a rushed report or no report. Undoing the damage to the NHS is not an option. That’s not the objective. It’s to learn how to cause less damage during any similar event. Assuming anything would be better, when it could easily be worse, is stupid.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Mattconrov 12 Aug 23 6.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Safe and effective my ass. That's what we were told. Pfizer obviously don't believe it.
" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mattconrov 12 Aug 23 6.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Scumbag Doctor wanting to give the jab to children Edited by Mattconrov (12 Aug 2023 6.08pm)
" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  12 Aug 23 6.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Frankly, so what? Better that than a rushed report or no report. Undoing the damage to the NHS is not an option. That’s not the objective. It’s to learn how to cause less damage during any similar event. Assuming anything would be better, when it could easily be worse, is stupid.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Aug 23 7.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Very possibly if not to would create an even worse situation. I would not be at all surprised if the report concluded that the problem with the lockdowns was not the principle but in the delays in applying them and the stringency of application. Earlier and stronger could have meant more effective and shorter, resulting in less damage, less cost and a quicker recovery. We will know in due time.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Aug 23 7.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mattconrov
Safe and effective my ass. That's what we were told. Pfizer obviously don't believe it. Complete nonsense. Just another conspiracy theory. The pharma companies needed indemnity guarantees to allow them to actually produce the vaccines. Not to have them would mean they could not go ahead because they would fail to meet corporate policies, regulatory conditions and invalidate their insurance.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 12 Aug 23 8.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Very possibly if not to would create an even worse situation. I would not be at all surprised if the report concluded that the problem with the lockdowns was not the principle but in the delays in applying them and the stringency of application. Earlier and stronger could have meant more effective and shorter, resulting in less damage, less cost and a quicker recovery. We will know in due time. Possibly although Scotland had longer and stronger lockdown and worse rates.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eaglesdare 12 Aug 23 8.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Remember players and fans collapsing at the games? All swept under the carpet. Not even an investigation to rule out the you know what
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Aug 23 9.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Remember players and fans collapsing at the games? All swept under the carpet. Not even an investigation to rule out the you know what This ought to set your mind at rest, though somehow I very much doubt you will accept it. Those who believe in conspiracy theories always have a problem with actual facts.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eaglesdare 12 Aug 23 9.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This ought to set your mind at rest, though somehow I very much doubt you will accept it. Those who believe in conspiracy theories always have a problem with actual facts. What caused the heat attack by Fulham supporter Paul Parish? Yet again you dismiss a question with the "conspiracy theory tag" Most "conspiracy theories" end up being true after a couple of months anyway.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mattconrov 12 Aug 23 10.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Complete nonsense. Just another conspiracy theory. The pharma companies needed indemnity guarantees to allow them to actually produce the vaccines. Not to have them would mean they could not go ahead because they would fail to meet corporate policies, regulatory conditions and invalidate their insurance. That sounds like a croc of &###£. They were given indemnity because they hadn't been tested properly or had long term studies.it was done under emergency use. Look fair enough it was rushed through I get it. But people were not given informed consent. The government and pharma companies told us they were safe and effective. Effective at injuring many yes.
" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mattconrov 12 Aug 23 10.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
So by the pharmaceutical companies being covered by governments from death and injury from the jab ( the real reason they were given it) there was no incentive for them to spend too much time making it safe and effective. Edited by Mattconrov (12 Aug 2023 10.20pm)
" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.