This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 14 Sep 2015 2.35pm
Wouldn't But more to the point - would they?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Hoof Hearted 15 Sep 15 10.51am | |
---|---|
The law is an ass. Too much emphasis on protecting people's rights rather than a framework to protect the innocent victims. I'll bet all of them invoked their rights to non comment during their investigation. 9 months in prison is no deterrent for being a part of a £21M scam that has caused financial hardship to many people. I'll bet most of them will only serve half the term anyway. This case needs reviewing as the Judge does appear to have been lenient - maybe because they were aged women?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
These women are pure scum and 9 months is a bloody joke.The people whose lives they have ruined will feel so let down by the courts.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.29am
21m for 9 months, if you get to keep the money - definitely worth it. Although they may well have been less 'primary' figures, I notice that two or three of them have yet to be sentenced, presumably the ring leaders. Maybe these were people who 'didn't really profit significantly from the scam'
The people who were scammed should ask for the sentences to be reviewed.
Optimistic as ever |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Quote bubble wrap at 14 Sep 2015 2.36pm
That report is nearly a year old.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.