This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Number 10 Position
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Palace Passion  Bromley, South London 29 Dec 19 12.43pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Back in the day we used to play Jason Puncheon in a number 10 roll just behind the striker and it worked really well. Why can't we use Camarasa in that role now? I think it would work brilliantly and he deserves his chance.
|||||||||||P|A|L|A|C|E||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| dg1937 29 Dec 19 1.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What games have you seen Camarasa play in? Genuine question.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 29 Dec 19 1.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dg1937
What games have you seen Camarasa play in? Genuine question. Played there for Cardiff with good effect. I do not think we will see him in the forst team and expect him to leave in January. Personally I would have liked him to have some game time, as think he would do a job. Scored some cracking goals for a poor Cardiff team
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dynamicdick Dormansland 29 Dec 19 5.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Meyer......give him games
Bring back Brolin |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Glazier#1 29 Dec 19 10.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Riedevald? I could see that.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| aashman12 29 Dec 19 10.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Palace Passion
Back in the day we used to play Jason Puncheon in a number 10 roll just behind the striker and it worked really well. Why can't we use Camarasa in that role now? I think it would work brilliantly and he deserves his chance. Deserves a chance how????
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sickboy Deal or Croydon 30 Dec 19 8.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Would need to go to 4 4 2 to play a no 10.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| palace99 New Mills 30 Dec 19 5.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by sickboy
Would need to go to 4 4 2 to play a no 10. No you dont. 433 fits a number 10 really well with 2 holding midfielders. Man city often play 433 with only 1 holding midfielder. Under Roy we essentially play 3 holding midfielders, hence we score so few goals
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Crystal_Clear  Belfast 30 Dec 19 7.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by palace99
No you dont. 433 fits a number 10 really well with 2 holding midfielders. Man city often play 433 with only 1 holding midfielder. Under Roy we essentially play 3 holding midfielders, hence we score so few goals Conversely, why we don't concede many.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 31 Dec 19 11.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
It would be good to have the attacking talent that would allow us to play a number 10, but until we have the right ammunition, we'll need to stick to Roy's safety first approach (although once we reach the safety zone, hopefully before the end of February, Roy could afford to experiment with a more expansive formation.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lyons550 Shirley 31 Dec 19 2.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Palace Passion
Back in the day we used to play Jason Puncheon in a number 10 roll just behind the striker and it worked really well. Why can't we use Camarasa in that role now? I think it would work brilliantly and he deserves his chance.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.