Loftus-Cheek

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Loftus-Cheek

Visit the current forum | Forum Rules

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

sydtheeagle England 31 Mar 22 9.21pm
Originally posted by MrRobbo Whilst I don't disagree in principle: Connor is a Chelsea boy, he's been there his whole life, it will take a lot to walk away from that, always wondering if he could have made it. Others have done it, Chelsea have quite a few young English lads in and around the first team. He has consistently stepped up over the last couple of seasons, most recently getting MOTM for England. Why would he feel like he couldn't make the step up again Sensible, and I do agree with a lot of what you say. I think an awful lot depends on what happens with Chelsea's takeover and the ramifications it has on their budget, manager, and planning for next season. Given their strength in depth, though, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that they may think one more year at Selhurst might not be the worst thing for Connor and accept that if they're not planning to play him extensively next season, playing every week for Palace for another twelve months may leave them with a better player in the end than having an occasional runout off the bench for Chelsea. We can all hope. And he's certainly happy here so I think Connor would settle for that if he knew he had a future at Chelsea to play for in the mid- to long term. Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

sydtheeagle

England 31 Mar 22 9.21pm

Originally posted by MrRobbo

Whilst I don't disagree in principle:

Connor is a Chelsea boy, he's been there his whole life, it will take a lot to walk away from that, always wondering if he could have made it.

Others have done it, Chelsea have quite a few young English lads in and around the first team.

He has consistently stepped up over the last couple of seasons, most recently getting MOTM for England. Why would he feel like he couldn't make the step up again

Sensible, and I do agree with a lot of what you say. I think an awful lot depends on what happens with Chelsea's takeover and the ramifications it has on their budget, manager, and planning for next season. Given their strength in depth, though, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that they may think one more year at Selhurst might not be the worst thing for Connor and accept that if they're not planning to play him extensively next season, playing every week for Palace for another twelve months may leave them with a better player in the end than having an occasional runout off the bench for Chelsea. We can all hope. And he's certainly happy here so I think Connor would settle for that if he knew he had a future at Chelsea to play for in the mid- to long term.

Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Eaglecoops CR3 01 Apr 22 1.30pm
Originally posted by sydtheeagle Sensible, and I do agree with a lot of what you say. I think an awful lot depends on what happens with Chelsea's takeover and the ramifications it has on their budget, manager, and planning for next season. Given their strength in depth, though, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that they may think one more year at Selhurst might not be the worst thing for Connor and accept that if they're not planning to play him extensively next season, playing every week for Palace for another twelve months may leave them with a better player in the end than having an occasional runout off the bench for Chelsea. We can all hope. And he's certainly happy here so I think Connor would settle for that if he knew he had a future at Chelsea to play for in the mid- to long term. Agree, it is the best all round solution.

Eaglecoops

CR3 01 Apr 22 1.30pm

Originally posted by sydtheeagle

Agree, it is the best all round solution.

NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 01 Apr 22 2.26pm
Originally posted by sydtheeagle Sensible, and I do agree with a lot of what you say. I think an awful lot depends on what happens with Chelsea's takeover and the ramifications it has on their budget, manager, and planning for next season. Given their strength in depth, though, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that they may think one more year at Selhurst might not be the worst thing for Connor and accept that if they're not planning to play him extensively next season, playing every week for Palace for another twelve months may leave them with a better player in the end than having an occasional runout off the bench for Chelsea. We can all hope. And he's certainly happy here so I think Connor would settle for that if he knew he had a future at Chelsea to play for in the mid- to long term. My Chelsea mates all think that Gallagher will get the opportunity to replace Kante next season. Old, Ungifted and White

NEILLO

Shoreham-by-Sea 01 Apr 22 2.26pm

Originally posted by sydtheeagle

My Chelsea mates all think that Gallagher will get the opportunity to replace Kante next season.

Old, Ungifted and White

Eaglecoops CR3 01 Apr 22 7.20pm
Originally posted by NEILLO My Chelsea mates all think that Gallagher will get the opportunity to replace Kante next season. I’d be happy to take Kante of their hands if he is not going to be picked next year.

Eaglecoops

CR3 01 Apr 22 7.20pm

Originally posted by NEILLO

My Chelsea mates all think that Gallagher will get the opportunity to replace Kante next season.

I’d be happy to take Kante of their hands if he is not going to be picked next year.

YT Oxford 03 Apr 22 7.57am
Loftus-Cheek wasn't much cop yesterday against the mighty Brentford. Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Oxford 03 Apr 22 7.57am

Loftus-Cheek wasn't much cop yesterday against the mighty Brentford.

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 03 Apr 22 9.17am
Originally posted by YT Loftus-Cheek wasn't much cop yesterday against the mighty Brentford. Will someone please get real, he is on 150k a week at Chelsea, Gallagher will go back to Chelsea, our midfield will be Eze in front of two of Kouyate, Hughes, Sclupp, Olise will take Ezes place if he is injured and Rak-Sakyi would take Olises place, Nketiah will come in, Wilf will sign a new contract, And Benteke will disappear in the Bermuda triangle, “That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Lanzo-Ad

Lanzarote 03 Apr 22 9.17am

Originally posted by YT

Loftus-Cheek wasn't much cop yesterday against the mighty Brentford.

Will someone please get real, he is on 150k a week at Chelsea, Gallagher will go back to Chelsea, our midfield will be Eze in front of two of Kouyate, Hughes, Sclupp, Olise will take Ezes place if he is injured and Rak-Sakyi would take Olises place, Nketiah will come in, Wilf will sign a new contract, And Benteke will disappear in the Bermuda triangle,

“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 03 Apr 22 10.23am
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad Will someone please get real, he is on 150k a week at Chelsea, Don't know what he's on but agree it's unlikely he'll come here Gallagher will go back to Chelsea, Agreed our midfield will be Eze in front of two of Kouyate, Hughes, Sclupp, I expect us to bring in at least 1 new midfielder so we need to see who etc. Olise will take Ezes place if he is injured and Rak-Sakyi would take Olises place, No need for Olise to take Eze's place as there will still be the 3 you mention plus any incomer(s). You're determined to get Rak-Sakyi in somehow. I suspect he'll get cup game opportunities if he proves himself in pre-season Nketiah will come in, I hope not. Would rathere spend the money on a RB or midfielder Wilf will sign a new contract, looking more promising than it was And Benteke will disappear in the Bermuda triangle, Wishful thinking Lanzo - he'll probably still be here Edited by doombear (03 Apr 2022 10.24am) Edited by doombear (03 Apr 2022 10.31am) Edited by doombear (03 Apr 2022 10.32am)

doombear

Too far from Selhurst Park 03 Apr 22 10.23am

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Will someone please get real, he is on 150k a week at Chelsea,
Don't know what he's on but agree it's unlikely he'll come here

Gallagher will go back to Chelsea,
Agreed

our midfield will be Eze in front of two of Kouyate, Hughes, Sclupp,
I expect us to bring in at least 1 new midfielder so we need to see who etc.

Olise will take Ezes place if he is injured and Rak-Sakyi would take Olises place,
No need for Olise to take Eze's place as there will still be the 3 you mention plus any incomer(s).

You're determined to get Rak-Sakyi in somehow. I suspect he'll get cup game opportunities if he proves himself in pre-season

Nketiah will come in,
I hope not. Would rathere spend the money on a RB or midfielder

Wilf will sign a new contract,
looking more promising than it was

And Benteke will disappear in the Bermuda triangle,
Wishful thinking Lanzo - he'll probably still be here

Edited by doombear (03 Apr 2022 10.24am)

Edited by doombear (03 Apr 2022 10.31am)

Edited by doombear (03 Apr 2022 10.32am)

Fatherken 03 Apr 22 10.40am
any chance Lanzo gets . I know he won't change his mind even Benteke scores the winner in the semi's to get us to the final . I will wait and not care for Lanzo reply

Fatherken

03 Apr 22 10.40am

any chance Lanzo gets .
I know he won't change his mind even Benteke scores the winner in the semi's to get us to the final .
I will wait and not care for Lanzo reply

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Loftus-Cheek

Site Map