This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Perhaps the next developed skill will be - ways to waste time whilst keeping the ball in play without getting booked for time wasting. Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
The Community Shield game lasted 102 minutes and the average match time on the opening day of the EFL season was 105 mins 33 seconds. Naturally, lots of venom being discharged mainly from losers in this new rule era. The big question is - will it encourage or discourage time wasting?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
Perhaps the next developed skill will be - ways to waste time whilst keeping the ball in play without getting booked for time wasting. Offside. The only legal way on the field of play where you cannot get cautioned nor where time is added on.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by YT
"Subbing" was recently discussed in another thread. In theory, a substitution will not eat up any playing time because additional time is supposed to be added on by the referee but, as mentioned in that thread, they nevertheless can disrupt the flow of the game. Your suggestion about the final phase is interesting, but surely you must see that coaches would simply tell their players to start limping at the appropriate time! Jorden Ayew is forever limping
|
|
|
Originally posted by monkey
I know one thing they could do to discourage time wasting, if a player goes down injured, obviously if it’s clearly not serious, let the physio on and then carry on. They do it in Rugby, they just play on around the physio and stricken player. I’m sure those rolling round like they’d been shot would soon jump up if they weren’t the centre of attention anymore and they’d soon learn it’s a waste of time feigning injury anyway Edited by monkey (08 Aug 2023 11.31am) See what you mean, but i really like the new format, that after they've been treated, they have to go off the pitch & wait a minimum of 30 secs before being allowed back on.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
obviously none of these new rules will apply to the big clubs, even more chances for referees to make sure that the "right team" wins, thus keeping Sky happy Hmmm... wasn't it Mr Guardiola who expressed his upset at the change and therefore the large amount of stoppage time after his side conceded a late goal in the (what I call) 'Charity Shield'?
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
|
Originally posted by YT
Hmmm... wasn't it Mr Guardiola who expressed his upset at the change and therefore the large amount of stoppage time after his side conceded a late goal in the (what I call) 'Charity Shield'? You noticed that as well, claimed the 'Big Brains' didn't inform them etc etc . . .
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
You noticed that as well, claimed the 'Big Brains' didn't inform them etc etc . . . He always has a moan about something when they lose but he knows he can get an advantage out of it. In all fairness, he hasn't had to moan too often recently.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
while i applaud Referees giving a fella a maximum of ten seconds , for a throw-in. We still have player x, about to throw in.....and then he defers to player y for the same throw. its clear and obvious time-wasting. I thought the same thing Palazio. Very clever tactic - Keep giving the ball to another player to throw in. Or are referees taking note of the total time taken?
Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled. |
|
|
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
There are two aspects of the modern game I really dislike. The first is the tendancy of players to surround the refereee to vociferously dispute a decision, often touching him in the process (isn't that illegal?). The second is the ridiculous practice of making unnecessary substitutions late in the game, especially as 5 subs are now allowed. Both these things waste playing time and disrupt the flow of play. The time wasting aspect was particularly noticeable at Goodison Park when Chilwell won a penalty after a foul by Doucoure. I've read that it was 3 minutes and 10 seconds before the penalty was taken after the protestations of the players and Pickford's shameful tactics. In all the ball was in play for only 51mins and 47secs during that match. Even in our game on Friday there was only 59mins and 33secs of actual playing time. As far as substitutions are concerned, 40 (54%) of the 74 made in all Prem games were made in the last quarter of the game. Man City and Newcastle used all 5 during this time. They are not tactical and, apart from disrupting the game, have no real value. I'd prefer substitutions during the last quarter of a game only be made as the result of injuries to try to avoid the time wasting and disruption. Certainly not illegal possibly unlawful. Edited by beak (22 Aug 2023 10.54am)
|
|
|
Whilst they are taking note of the time taken for these events perhaps they could also try to see if they can have the throw in / free kicks taken from the right place - Last night Arsenal were stealing yards at every opportunity. Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
I thought the same thing Palazio. Very clever tactic - Keep giving the ball to another player to throw in. Or are referees taking note of the total time taken?
|
|
|
Ah look....If we were winning last night our players would have been doing the exact same and we would love it.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.