This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think investors are limited by what cash they can inject into the club. The only way to increase revenue is through lowering wages, selling players and the the commercial arm of the club, Merchandising, ticket sales, advertising etc. Where it gets murk is if Tony Bloom decides to sponsor the club shirt for a ridiculous amount. Or in the case of City you get your Arab mates through their companies to do the same thing. It's why FFP doesn't work it would be a lot easier if they simplified the rules and allowed those who had money to inject it into the club legally. FFP should be about stopping clubs borrowing too much money as Pompey did. But wasn't it equally so to stop teams like City just buying their way to success?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think investors are limited by what cash they can inject into the club. The only way to increase revenue is through lowering wages, selling players and the the commercial arm of the club, Merchandising, ticket sales, advertising etc. Where it gets murk is if Tony Bloom decides to sponsor the club shirt for a ridiculous amount. Or in the case of City you get your Arab mates through their companies to do the same thing. It's why FFP doesn't work it would be a lot easier if they simplified the rules and allowed those who had money to inject it into the club legally. FFP should be about stopping clubs borrowing too much money as Pompey did. Well that's what they are trying, and apparently failing to stop, and any sponsorship has to be at market rate. (presume the old 3 competitive quotes and all
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.