Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
exitstageright ![]() |
|
---|---|
Mass-murderer, Anders Breivik is suing the Norwegian government for abuse of his human rights. Among his long list of complaints are: "... being held in inhumane conditions ... he said his cell was poorly decorated and had no view. He also complained that his coffee was served cold, he did not have enough butter for his bread, and he was not allowed moisturiser."
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
He's not alone either:-
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Catfish ![]() |
|
---|---|
Poor little scamps.
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I fail to grasp why any murderer should be entitled to any human rights. Let's hope that the remainder of his life deteriorates slowly.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Asian Eagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
That guy dont have human rights.He murdered 88 people with cold blood and he talks about human rights,,,,String him up, no wait that is too simple, trow him in the dungeon and leave him for the rats to feed on him
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Harpo
I fail to grasp why any murderer should be entitled to any human rights. Let's hope that the remainder of his life deteriorates slowly. Human rights are applicable to all human beings, not selectively, same as the constitution of the US applies to all people, not selectively. He won't win his case, but will eventually end up labelled a vexatious litigant.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Human rights are applicable to all human beings, not selectively, same as the constitution of the US applies to all people, not selectively. He won't win his case, but will eventually end up labelled a vexatious litigant. You forfeit your rights once you decide to extinguish someone else's right to life IMO. The ECHR can f*** right off, just as we keep telling them about prisoners voting.
Optimistic as ever |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
You forfeit your rights once you decide to extinguish someone else's right to life IMO. The ECHR can f*** right off, just as we keep telling them about prisoners voting. Yup.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Human rights are applicable to all human beings, not selectively, same as the constitution of the US applies to all people, not selectively. He won't win his case, but will eventually end up labelled a vexatious litigant. I am glad there are some people like you left in this world. We can't always do the right thing but that should be our ideal at least.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
You forfeit your rights once you decide to extinguish someone else's right to life IMO. The ECHR can f*** right off, just as we keep telling them about prisoners voting. Yeh, kind of isn't a 'Right'once you allow them to be dished out selectively. The benefits far out way the negatives. Brevik is a c***.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
exitstageright ![]() |
|
---|---|
Of course, if those stupid, backward, non-progressive Norwegians had not foolishly voted to stay out of the EU, the persecuted mass-murderer would be able to bathe in moisturising cream - probably made from the boiled down bodies of those evil Zionists.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
jamiemartin721 ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
You forfeit your rights once you decide to extinguish someone else's right to life IMO. The ECHR can f*** right off, just as we keep telling them about prisoners voting. Well it that's the case, its not a right, its just innocent until proven guilty. The notion of a right is that its inalienable. Key fact of the ECHR is that its not them telling us 'prisoners have the right to vote' its our law that stipulates Prisoners have a right to vote (as all citizens have access to the right to vote). Our Judicary referred the conflict between prisoners being unable to vote and having the right to vote to the ECHR, who said in response, essentially, that the UK needs to address its laws according to include some kind of rules around enfranchisement for prisoners. Its only the UK media and Conservative government who seem to think the ECHR is actually ordering them to do something. In fact the ECHR is just doing what the UK judiciary and court of appeals asked them to do, in response to the laws of the UK.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.