Man U had to play with kids when they developed their stadium. Arsenal had a depleted transfer budget when they rebuilt theirs. W Ham have been "gifted" the Olympic Stadium (renamed the London Stadium) and so have been able to develop their squad and stadium at the same time.
Whatever our plans are to develop Selhurst Park or rebuild at the Crystal Palace Stadium, I don't suppose we'll be subsidised by public funding like the Hammers.
I received a tweet today suggesting the most appropriate name for W Ham's new home should be the Taxpayer's Stadium.
Couldn't agree more. This name must stick!

No I don't suppose we will, but we didn't win the 1966 World Cup so we don't deserve the accolades of a grateful nation.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

i think that SJ wannabe prick parish should be sacked as he hasnt build us a brand new stadium yet.

cannot beleive a club our size & stature is still playing at selhurst.

and dont get me started on the s*** hot-dogs, it makes me mad

‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway

Just wait the novelty of a new stadium will soon wear off .West Ham have been gifted a poisoned chalice as it is not a good football experience at the ground.

c***s should be HMRC on their shirts too.

I thought they had retractable stands that could move closer to the pitch? On MOTD the stands still seemed pretty far away from the pitch to me.

Live in Melbourne or Victoria, Australia?
Support Crystal Palace?

Well join the Crystal Palace Melbourne Supporters Club:
[Link]

Adelaide, South Australia? Join here:
[Link]