This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Are they right to refuse???
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 sniffer dagenham  The narm, Dagennarm 14 Sep 16 12.55pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
As we all know we have quite a few politically correct people in here but, what is everyone's reaction. Are they correct in refusing or should they have been given compensation or shorter jail term. My answer is they should not be allowed to protest against what happened to them. They could have taken lives of innocent and defenseless people. Just like the rest of those that find terrorism killing people for the name of their belief. Hope they rot in a prison cell and never see freedom again
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
cb1969  Back in the 'hood 14 Sep 16 12.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It shouldn't have even got that far, these scum deserve no rights.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Sep 16 1.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by sniffer dagenham
As we all know we have quite a few politically correct people in here but, what is everyone's reaction. Are they correct in refusing or should they have been given compensation or shorter jail term. My answer is they should not be allowed to protest against what happened to them. They could have taken lives of innocent and defenseless people. Just like the rest of those that find terrorism killing people for the name of their belief. Hope they rot in a prison cell and never see freedom again They have the same rights anyone else has, they appealed and the ECHR made a decision, that their rights had not been denied, and the actions of the Police were entirely lawful. Job done.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 14 Sep 16 1.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It was up to them whether they answered the questions or not, without a lawyer present. Should've been told to sod off, rather than waste anyone's time.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Sep 16 1.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
It was up to them whether they answered the questions or not, without a lawyer present. Should've been told to sod off, rather than waste anyone's time.
ECHR gets it right shocker?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 14 Sep 16 1.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 14 Sep 16 2.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 14 Sep 16 2.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
3 bullets.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
stayloa  Beckenham 14 Sep 16 2.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Everyone no matter what they've done are entitled to basic rights. They in turn have the ability to question if those rights were abused. ECHR agreed they weren't. All sorted. Doesn't meant they shouldn't rot in jail as a a result of their crimes, but it's a dangerous world in which we abolish rights of anyone.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| paperhat croydon 14 Sep 16 2.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
"But judges ruled that the police were justified because of the urgent need to protect the public" just about covers that argument. They should be thanking the authorities for being lenient enough to only imprison them.
Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Pussay Patrol  14 Sep 16 6.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Yes, and just after we've given Europe the big thumbs down. Maybe the penny's dropped with these guys too
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| PA Bedfordshire 14 Sep 16 8.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by stayloa
Everyone no matter what they've done are entitled to basic rights. They in turn have the ability to question if those rights were abused. ECHR agreed they weren't. All sorted. Doesn't meant they shouldn't rot in jail as a a result of their crimes, but it's a dangerous world in which we abolish rights of anyone. Having access to a lawyer isn't a basic human right. Having access to air is a basic human right. When you've done what these people did, only very basic rights like air should be allowed. Evil scum bags. Edited by PA (14 Sep 2016 8.19pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterAll images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.