This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I see that the 27 year old man on trial for murdering Grace Millane cannot be named for legal reasons. Does anyone know why?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I see that the 27 year old man on trial for murdering Grace Millane cannot be named for legal reasons. Does anyone know why? I wondered that. Maybe he is on bail for another offence
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's in another country, isn't it? Maybe they have anonymity for defendants. Maybe because there's a 'sexual' element, then they have anonymity.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
He has now been found guilty but according to the BBC still can't be named for legal reasons. Most odd
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
He has now been found guilty but according to the BBC still can't be named for legal reasons. Most odd Just listened to the news and the reporter said no information on why and that film and photos had been fuzzied.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Oh god, not another royal scandal.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
His name appears to be Shane Kempson
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Odd UK newspapers don't usually pay attention to injunctions in foreign courts, especially now that he has been convicted.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Purely a guess but I am wondering if because this case is being tried in Australia and they have our Queen as head of state then perhaps the sub-judice rules apply over here as well? He might have another trial due to start? Some legal aracanary around the idea of Regina v ?
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's every parent of a daughter's nightmare. Lone female backpackers always carry that extra risk....but I'm not going to blame her as it could have happened here walking in the park. It's about that one in a hundred psychopath who's always out there.....which is perhaps a higher percentage in certain situations.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I guess that he could be involved in another trial. He is due to be sentenced in February which seems a long way off. Poor woman and poor family.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Invalid user 2019 ![]() |
|
---|---|
A Horrendous situation. The only good that can be taken from it is that this monster didn't get away with it.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.