This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That hypocritical comment from Sydney Sound Bite had me laughing all day All positive feedback welcome
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Didn't quite put the debate to bed regarding farmers who voted to lose subsidies? Or is it another case of leave argument falling apart like a cheap suit again? When I asked up thread if you knew anything about this you said yes, but you keep asking the same question. Ihe system of payments to farmers is going to change. The farming community welcome this, CAP as been very unpopular, through various iterations, for years.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Didn't quite put the debate to bed regarding farmers who voted to lose subsidies? Or is it another case of leave argument falling apart like a cheap suit again? Farmers make more from subsidies than they do from farming. Maybe they’re in the wrong business.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I have seen stories about the mega rich getting these subsidies when clearly they don't need them. I don't know enough to have the answer but I would hope that any future subsidies would be based around protecting the environment and the quality of the food. If a farmer wishes to go organic or move away from factory intensive farming that should be encouraged. Mps on the take from the eu!
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
When I asked up thread if you knew anything about this you said yes, but you keep asking the same question. Ihe system of payments to farmers is going to change. The farming community welcome this, CAP as been very unpopular, through various iterations, for years. Doesn't explain why they'd vote leave though
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Doesn't explain why they'd vote leave though Perhaps they’re concerned with wider issues than their own financial advantage.
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Perhaps they’re concerned with wider issues than their own financial advantage. Such as? What are the other advantages that balance the financial loss?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Such as? What are the other advantages that balance the financial loss? The same ones as 17 million plus voters who aren’t farmers.
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The same ones as 17 million plus voters who aren’t farmers. Oh i see, we're back here again, its the usual 'I'm happy to be financially worse off / put my livelihood at risk for ____________(insert political slogan) argument?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Oh i see, we're back here again, its the usual 'I'm happy to be financially worse off / put my livelihood at risk for ____________(insert political slogan) argument? Yes. The one you support.
|
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Didn't quite put the debate to bed regarding farmers who voted to lose subsidies? Or is it another case of leave argument falling apart like a cheap suit again? James O'Brien MkII.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dollardays
It's tragicomic that MPs have all swanned off on carefree holidays after getting the Brexit extension. They should stay put until something is thrashed out. Priorities. Sadly not in their remit.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The same ones as 17 million plus voters who aren’t farmers. That should be in the past tense. It would be so interesting to see what people are feeling now. I can't understand why some don't see that sentiment has moved on as the game has changed. Or maybe they do see that and they are trying to thwart the will of the people by blocking a further vote. In the 1970s it only took 2 years to elapse for there to be a confirmatory vote. Since then there was no real prospect of a vote changing anything until the very recent history. Now we are back to a vote could easily drive changes. So let's have one.
|
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Sadly not in their remit. You're right of course. What was the MPs website called again 'They Work For You'. Yeah, right!
|
|
| Pussay Patrol |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
James O'Brien MkII. You can follow me on twitter as well if you like?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That should be in the past tense. It would be so interesting to see what people are feeling now. I can't understand why some don't see that sentiment has moved on as the game has changed. Or maybe they do see that and they are trying to thwart the will of the people by blocking a further vote. In the 1970s it only took 2 years to elapse for there to be a confirmatory vote. Since then there was no real prospect of a vote changing anything until the very recent history. Now we are back to a vote could easily drive changes. So let's have one. The fact that the Brexit party is currently leading the polls seems to indicate that not everyone has had a change of heart.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The fact that the Brexit party is currently leading the polls seems to indicate that not everyone has had a change of heart. Great Nothing to fear from a plebiscite then. Let’s get on with it and confirm the will of the people.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Great Nothing to fear from a plebiscite then. Let’s get on with it and confirm the will of the people. That’s the way. If they’d got 1% of the vote it would be proof we need another vote. No wonder you’re not used to losing.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.