This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
May sacks Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson for the Huawei leak. Operating in the national interest gets you the sack in this country. He is strenuously denying it? Nobody can leak from the National Security Council it is officially secret, obviously security is compromised by any disclosures. Still he denies this, will we be able to find out the truth?
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
He is strenuously denying it? Nobody can leak from the National Security Council it is officially secret, obviously security is compromised by any disclosures. Still he denies this, will we be able to find out the truth? Mmmm....I don't know if he denies it.....but I suppose there is the criminality aspect of not wanting to go to jail. On reflection I think perhaps you are right about 'not leaking' while you are actually a part of the NSC. He should have resigned and then leaked.......When the government are operating in what you regard as against the national interest.....you shouldn't be a party to that. Mind you, resigning and then the leak happening makes it pretty obvious.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Vending machines will be a UK phenomenon in the post brexit utopia. Perhaps I should add it to the list? Blue Passport Anything I've missed? So if we stay in the EU we won't see job losses through automation? You cannot halt progress you can only shape it.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
He is strenuously denying it? Nobody can leak from the National Security Council it is officially secret, obviously security is compromised by any disclosures. Still he denies this, will we be able to find out the truth? If guilty he had to go, if guilty.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
If guilty he had to go, if guilty. The government using Huawei in national infrastructure. What is his correct means of action?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The government using Huawei in national infrastructure. What is his correct means of action? This is a political s*** storm of biblical proportions. It is being reported that Williamson is claiming he is being targeted because of a feud with the Cabinet Secretary. The implications of which put almost everything that we accept as the given way of Goverernance up in the air. This story is huge. A vertitable tsunami of s*** about to break.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
This is a political s*** storm of biblical proportions. It is being reported that Williamson is claiming he is being targeted because of a feud with the Cabinet Secretary. The implications of which put almost everything that we accept as the given way of Goverernance up in the air. This story is huge. A vertitable tsunami of s*** about to break. Interesting. In the meantime May has replaced Williamson with another 'Tory' feminist. Essentially surrounding herself with a leadership that is miles away from its grass roots.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The government using Huawei in national infrastructure. What is his correct means of action? He has collective responsibility, or he could have resigned, but he cannot leak, a criminal offence. Presumably it is a criminal offence, in which case he could defend himself? A very unconvincing letter from May.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Presumably it is a criminal offence, in which case he could defend himself? I struggle to see how he cannot be prosecuted.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
I struggle to see how he cannot be prosecuted. Suspicion is different from having proof.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The government using Huawei in national infrastructure. What is his correct means of action? Resign and make a statement from the back benches. I don't like the idea either but whoever leaked this did it the wrong way. By the way I didn't think he was a very good defence minister but that is besides the point.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
[Tweet Link]Go Nigel. I hope the good people of Peterborough give the Tories and Labour a right good kicking.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Suspicion is different from having proof.
And now he claims it is a feud with the senior civil servant behind it all. This does not, cannot, just fade away. If Williamson did it then he needs to end up behind bars. Leaking from that specific grouping is beyond the pale. But if he is innocent, as he is claiming, then there is something seriously amiss. And potentially game changing. Perhaps I am guilty of hyperbole here but I cannot see it in any other terms. This is truly new territory, even in our current f***ed up political maelstrom.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
And now he claims it is a feud with the senior civil servant behind it all. This does not, cannot, just fade away. If Williamson did it then he needs to end up behind bars. Leaking from that specific grouping is beyond the pale. But if he is innocent, as he is claiming, then there is something seriously amiss. And potentially game changing. Perhaps I am guilty of hyperbole here but I cannot see it in any other terms. This is truly new territory, even in our current f***ed up political maelstrom. This is another gift to the opposition. If May has the proof they will say her cabinet has gone rogue which is true as collective responsibility has broken down over Brexit. If it is just suspicions then they will have a field day in pointing out yet another error in her judgement. Either way it's another mess from this hopeless government.
One more point |
|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
|
About time,!!
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.