This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
Pussay Patrol  09 May 19 9.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Sex crimes have increased considerably. Do you also put that down to police cuts. Police numbers have been cut in the last few years so I think I'll go out and rape somebody. Somehow it doesn't really have the ring of truth about it There is an element of truth to that, with less police presence on the street and police not having enough time to investigate crime, conviction rates are lower which emboldens criminals, organised crime and increases more opportunistic crime Still don't understand even in light of the fact crime has increased why you want less police? Edited by Pussay Patrol (09 May 2019 9.07am)
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
09 May 19 9.30am Midlands Eagle  09 May 19 9.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Is this Thursday's PussyBollox? No-one has said that they want less police so stop deliberately misinterpreting what people say
|
|
| Pussay Patrol 09 May 19 9.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Is this Thursday's PussyBollox? No-one has said that they want less police so stop deliberately misinterpreting what people say OK I rephrase it, the current government have a policy to reduce police numbers due to austerity, in the same period crime has gone up, the correlation has been ratified by the police commissioner. Do you agree with this policy? We are not in recession and the financial crisis was more than a decade ago I don't understand a situation where having less police is a good thing? Edited by Pussay Patrol (09 May 2019 9.48am)
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| Stirlingsays 09 May 19 9.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
OK I rephrase it, the current government have a policy to reduce police numbers due to austerity, in the same period crime has gone up, the correlation has been ratified by the police commissioner. Do you agree with this policy? We are not in recession and the financial crisis was more than a decade ago I don't understand a situation where having less police is a good thing? Edited by Pussay Patrol (09 May 2019 9.48am) We had far less Police in proportion to citizens in the past before major immigration into the country. Perhaps the money for more Police should be paid for by those who supported this immigration. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 May 2019 10.02am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Stirlingsays 09 May 19 9.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
'Bollocks to Brexit' The Lib-dems message in their leaflets and you can get the t-shirt. (you can also get 'stop brexit' for the pathetic). Even better than 'fromage not Farage'. Vince Cable retiring shortly, always found him a decent type. You're going to get Fromaged in these EU elections Steely. Make sure you wipe your chin afterwards.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Midlands Eagle 09 May 19 10.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Do you agree with this policy? We are not in recession and the financial crisis was more than a decade ago I don't understand a situation where having less police is a good thing? Is it because your arguments against Brexit are so weak that you continually try and divert this thread to discuss other things?
|
|
| Pussay Patrol 09 May 19 10.09am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
We had far less Police in proportion to citizens in the past before major immigration into the country. Perhaps the money for more Police should be paid for by those who supported this immigration. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 May 2019 10.02am) They could use the £10bn benefit we received?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| dannyboy1978 09 May 19 10.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Who's telling you there's no money? What happens with the taxes you pay? You're arguing to pay into a system in the hope to get as little in return as possible? Just for you puss puss
|
|
| Pussay Patrol 09 May 19 10.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Is it because your arguments against Brexit are so weak that you continually try and divert this thread to discuss other things? It isnt relevant whether my argument is weak if the argument for Brexit is non existent (apart from blue passports)
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 09 May 19 10.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
It isnt relevant whether my argument is weak if the argument for Brexit is non existent (apart from blue passports) I would not say that arguing for a country to have self determination is "non existent". Try that with our former colonies who fought for and won independence from what they saw as a remote, centralising and undemocratic organisation. Likewise I can see the merits of arguing for a union of nations on a continent that had 3 major conflicts in the spate of 100 years largely due to a form of nationalism. However not every country on that continent feels the need to join the EU and I think as our history and to some extent culture differs it doesn't work for us either. Edited by Badger11 (09 May 2019 10.28am)
One more point |
|
| Pussay Patrol 09 May 19 10.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I would not say that arguing for a country to have self determination is "non existent". Try that with our former colonies who fought for and won independence from what they saw as a remote, centralising and undemocratic organisation. Likewise I can see the merits of arguing for a union of nations on a continent that had 3 major conflicts in the spate of 100 years largely due to a form of nationalism. However not every country on that continent feels the need to join the EU and I think as our history and to some extent culture differs it doesn't work for us either. Edited by Badger11 (09 May 2019 10.28am) There are good arguments to not have an EU and not be part of it but not strong enough arguments to withdraw from the EU. Where we are now proves that. The referendum was given with a recommendation to remain and no provision was made for a leave scenario, ie positive economic forecasts, the benefits of switching to self governance, how separate trade deals would be more advantageous and social benefits. The decision to leave was only through scepticism.
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| Midlands Eagle 09 May 19 10.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The referendum was given with a recommendation to remain Recommendation by whom?
|
|
| Pussay Patrol 09 May 19 11.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Recommendation by whom? The government
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| DANGERCLOSE London 09 May 19 11.34am |
|
|---|---|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 09 May 19 1.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The government The Remain side failed to explain the benefits of the EU to the majority of the people. They ran a negative campaign which the more sensible Remainers now recognise. Still just because they got it wrong doesn't entitled them to another go lots of politicians can argue that in hindsight they would do things differently. My postal vote has just arrived and I have voted for The Brexit Party. Or as some would say "Hard Cheese"
One more point |
|
| Pussay Patrol 09 May 19 1.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
The Remain side failed to explain the benefits of the EU to the majority of the people. They ran a negative campaign which the more sensible Remainers now recognise. Still just because they got it wrong doesn't entitled them to another go lots of politicians can argue that in hindsight they would do things differently. My postal vote has just arrived and I have voted for The Brexit Party. Or as some would say "Hard Cheese" Why does being in the EU need to be explained if we're in it? They ran a remain campaign because remain is the best option and most of the negatives of leaving in the government literature were spot on For me to vote leave I'd want to see a plan, hard evidence of economic prosperity and blueprint for the future. I'm not as easily seduced by the snake oil salesmen like Farage I'm afraid but good luck anyway
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| dannyboy1978 09 May 19 1.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Why does being in the EU need to be explained if we're in it? They ran a remain campaign because remain is the best option and most of the negatives of leaving in the government literature were spot on For me to vote leave I'd want to see a plan, hard evidence of economic prosperity and blueprint for the future. I'm not as easily seduced by the snake oil salesmen like Farage I'm afraid but good luck anyway Cameron tried to get a plan, he got a big fat NO, that's why people voted out, because we have self pride and don't prostitute our selves like you want to.
|
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 09 May 19 1.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Why does being in the EU need to be explained if we're in it? They ran a remain campaign because remain is the best option and most of the negatives of leaving in the government literature were spot on For me to vote leave I'd want to see a plan, hard evidence of economic prosperity and blueprint for the future. I'm not as easily seduced by the snake oil salesmen like Farage I'm afraid but good luck anyway And that's why you lost.
One more point |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.