This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by paperhat
whats the answer? make everyone vote? not very democratic Political parties that appeal to them? You have an issue here, and elsewhere, where the number of people who don't vote regularly hit half of the eligible population. In any democracy, that's something of a stain on the system, that half the population could not, would not or couldn't be bothered to vote for the candidate and proposals.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Funny how it always is when you lose. Which would beg the question as to why Donald Trump was declaring the system rigged long before the first vote was cast. Of course its not when you win either... Now its the judge on the Trump Lawsuit that's crooked and biased...
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Political parties that appeal to them? You have an issue here, and elsewhere, where the number of people who don't vote regularly hit half of the eligible population. In any democracy, that's something of a stain on the system, that half the population could not, would not or couldn't be bothered to vote for the candidate and proposals. There are far too many political experts on here for me to begin to summise as to the reasons or stats but I wonder what the mix of people that couldn't be ar$ed to vote, spoilt papers due to lack of credible candidate and new voters 'inspired' by what they'd heard from Trump were. sadly, no one will ever be happy as there is always a better system for someone but it does seem that much in the way of Brexit etc, that the 'little man' has decided they've had enough and want a drastic change. As odious as Clinton is, you cannot say she is any worse than Tango man, there have to be deeper seated reasons behind it.
Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan |
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Funnily enough the majority chose Clinton - she got more votes - so not democratic at all really. Fvcked up system. He's a tw@t and she's a bunny boiler. Been better if neither of them had got in. What is it with you.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Which would beg the question as to why Donald Trump was declaring the system rigged long before the first vote was cast. Of course its not when you win either... Now its the judge on the Trump Lawsuit that's crooked and biased... Perhaps he was right but still won.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What is it with you. The 'left' argue based mostly on feelings. Being consistent doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Originally posted by kennybrowns leftfoot
It's so pathetic isn't it??... Typical left wing self righteous, theatrical nonsense... And to think she gets paid for writing that s*** as well?... Unbelievable. Anyway back to the real world... If I'm honest I couldn't really give to much of a f***... I don't really care to much for America and I'm no fan of Trump but what I will say is this... At least the American people had a choice of who they wanted.... We got given a witch as our 'leader' and had no choice in the matter. So Trump being elected?... The majority have spoken and chose him... It's called democracy... Build a f***ing bridge and get over it... If you don't like it then f*** off and live in North Korea and see how you like that. Hitler and Mussolini were both voted in as prime minister before they took complete control - I don't think Trump is quite in their league, he hasn't got any theories for a start, but he is undoubtedly dangerous. John Stuart Mill got it spot on for me: "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives."
|
|
|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
Hitler and Mussolini were both voted in as prime minister before they took complete control - I don't think Trump is quite in their league, he hasn't got any theories for a start, but he is undoubtedly dangerous. John Stuart Mill got it spot on for me: "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." Which of course, is not what he said. But there you go, "only stupid people use quotes they haven't looked up to verify." NickinOX, Holmesdale online, 2016.
By the way, the original is better, and also, perhaps, somewhat prescient. The immense irony in this line of argument is, of course, what it says about the person or party that lost the election. If they couldn't even manage to beat an opponent who they think is supported largely by stupid people what does that tell us? It is worth pointing out that Clinton got less votes than Mitt Romney in 2012, and McCain in 2008, despite an increase in the number of registered voters (an area where Democrats have had more success than Republicans). Simply put, the Democratic party has turned off its core support who simply failed to vote. Between 5-10m Democrats and independents (based upon the last two elections) chose not to vote for her. Trump's vote was down on what Republicans have managed in the last two elections (and certainly when taking into account the population increase). Ultimately, Hillary failed to defeat an unpopular Republican candidate. That speaks volumes.
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
|
Originally posted by NickinOX
Which of course, is not what he said. But there you go, "only stupid people use quotes they haven't looked up to verify." NickinOX, Holmesdale online, 2016.
By the way, the original is better, and also, perhaps, somewhat prescient. The immense irony in this line of argument is, of course, what it says about the person or party that lost the election. If they couldn't even manage to beat an opponent who they think is supported largely by stupid people what does that tell us? It is worth pointing out that Clinton got less votes than Mitt Romney in 2012, and McCain in 2008, despite an increase in the number of registered voters (an area where Democrats have had more success than Republicans). Simply put, the Democratic party has turned off its core support who simply failed to vote. Between 5-10m Democrats and independents (based upon the last two elections) chose not to vote for her. Trump's vote was down on what Republicans have managed in the last two elections (and certainly when taking into account the population increase). Ultimately, Hillary failed to defeat an unpopular Republican candidate. That speaks volumes. I'm flattered you had to use Hansard to reply - here it is verbatim: "I did not mean that Conservatives are generally stupid; I meant, that stupid persons are generally Conservative" Why did you bother, really? That's what I hate about these threads, people rarely have an open mind and develop a point it's an I'm the cleverest contest, and when their point of view is undermined they go on the offensive, so boring - the substantive point is about Hitler and Mussolini being democratically elected. Engage with that and we may discuss something worthwhile and interesting. But if you want to play the rapier wit intellectual - fyi it's quotation not quote, quote is only a verb not a noun strictly speaking, but language is fluid and it will no doubt change.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Is he three quarters Scottish then? Are you sure? We are only half so if he is then 'yes' you are correct. If he is not then you are a mathematical numpty A penguin would be more at home in the Glens or the Gorbals than you. You have lived your life in the south of England. A pack of Waitrose shortbread is more Scottish than you. Makes me question why you cling to being an 'outsider' so much...
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
|
Can start a new thread titled Things more Scottish than kerms...
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
I'm flattered you had to use Hansard to reply - here it is verbatim: "I did not mean that Conservatives are generally stupid; I meant, that stupid persons are generally Conservative" Why did you bother, really? That's what I hate about these threads, people rarely have an open mind and develop a point it's an I'm the cleverest contest, and when their point of view is undermined they go on the offensive, so boring - the substantive point is about Hitler and Mussolini being democratically elected. Engage with that and we may discuss something worthwhile and interesting. But if you want to play the rapier wit intellectual - fyi it's quotation not quote, quote is only a verb not a noun strictly speaking, but language is fluid and it will no doubt change. You put it out there to make a point and I responded. I put a winking smiley to show that it was meant to be tongue in cheek. Clearly, you missed that. At the end of the day, John Stuart Mill didn't say what you claimed. It was very similar, but not exactly the same. As awful as I think Trump will be as president (and I did not vote for him), I doubt he will seize control of the instruments of state and run the country as dictator. Thus the comparison with Hitler and Mussolini, even if only broadly implied is vague and lazy. If that is what you think should pass for discourse, and judging by some of your other posts it is, then it's no wonder you are fed up of the discussion on the boards. After all, it's not exactly open minded is it? I also note, you have not bothered to address what I thought brought about Trump's success: which is a failure of the Democratic party to appeal to its own core support. But then you wouldn't, would you?
If you come to a fork in the road, take it. |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Perhaps he was right but still won. Not very rigged then. The point of a rigged election is that you cannot win it - and you'd expect the rigging candidate to do far better in the essential swing states.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What is it with you. Scotland has its own parliament vested to look after its peoples best interests and is a country. In the US what was essentially a two-horse race the one with most votes lost. Not democratic. In Scotland a simple yes/no for remain' the answer with most votes lost. Not democratic. For Scotland. You are all for democracy. Strongly so going by your posts so you should be vehemently agreeing with me about the democracy point not trying to undermine it. Unless, of course, the real inconsistency is coming from your side of the political fence.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
Hitler and Mussolini were both voted in as prime minister before they took complete control - I don't think Trump is quite in their league, he hasn't got any theories for a start, but he is undoubtedly dangerous. John Stuart Mill got it spot on for me: "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." I think if Trump starts to get 'carried away with power' the party will slap him into line. They'll take advantage of having the senate and house, and probably put a republican on the supreme court - but the degree of individual power the president has is limited. The first lesson most leaders learn is that whilst they're 'the head of state' they're hobbled by their own party, and a lot of republicans are not frothing at the mouth wanna be dictators. Plus, its kind of debatable how 'right wing' Trump actually is. Certainly he's got a lot more in common with the more moderate Republicans in terms of policy outside of walls and muslims. Whilst the President is capable of launching a nuclear strike, the likely reality of one just being able to 'do so because the want to' is negligible. More likely their advisors will simply 'restrain them' and issue medical approved removal of command. The military follow orders, but not slavishly and without question - especially from a president with no military experience.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Is Scottishness determined by ancestory or environmental? If it's the former then I am 1/4 Scottish. If it's the latter then I am 3/4 Scottish as I love a bit of Irn Bru and wearing a skirt. How Scottish are you lot? I have a violent temper, am mostly incomprehensible, as tight as a ducks chuff, deep fry my heroin and have early symptoms of liver failure. Any good?
Lend me a Tenor 31 May to 3 June 2017 John McIntosh Arts Centre with Superfly in the chorus |
|
|
Originally posted by Superfly
I have a violent temper, am mostly incomprehensible, as tight as a ducks chuff, deep fry my heroin and have early symptoms of liver failure. Any good? Not Scottish at all then, Super. Sorry.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by NickinOX
You put it out there to make a point and I responded. I put a winking smiley to show that it was meant to be tongue in cheek. Clearly, you missed that. At the end of the day, John Stuart Mill didn't say what you claimed. It was very similar, but not exactly the same. As awful as I think Trump will be as president (and I did not vote for him), I doubt he will seize control of the instruments of state and run the country as dictator. Thus the comparison with Hitler and Mussolini, even if only broadly implied is vague and lazy. If that is what you think should pass for discourse, and judging by some of your other posts it is, then it's no wonder you are fed up of the discussion on the boards. After all, it's not exactly open minded is it? I also note, you have not bothered to address what I thought brought about Trump's success: which is a failure of the Democratic party to appeal to its own core support. But then you wouldn't, would you?
Oh yes I would ... it's interesting and baffling from the outside how unpopular Hilary is - she seems different to when hubby was in charge - the accusations of coldness apply to my memory of her, she seemed scarily rational in a very blokish way, this sounds very sexist cos the Mays, Thatchers and Barbara Castles are as rational as any, but there was an unattractive focussed ruthless ambition, exemplified by the way she seemed not to give a sh*t about her husband's away form and seemingly gave status and position far greater priority - all impressions of course but impressions sway voters - there is the 'foundation' of course and it is screamingly obvious she was not just making room in her inbox when deleting those emails. You have to be mightily crap to be second to Trump but her crapness is still hard to fathom this side of the pond - if some American poster could edify that would be good. As far as the comparison with Hitler and Mussolini it's not vague and lazy - I agree with you that the US constitution and culture is too robust to be subordinated to a would be dictator, but it does show you should not always be supine with a democratic choice, George W led a basically criminal regime with the machine of democracy, Mugabe gets elected once every five years or so, so did Napoleon III, and big bad Donald is capable of creating some serious carnage in the next four years - there are times when the democratic choice is deeply flawed, like the election of Hitler and Mussolini, and it's not petty sour grapes to be concerned or anything to do with partisanship, it's disappointment that there are so many people daft enough and ignorant enough to support a wall-building, pussy-grabbing, dangerous, flippant fascist.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.