This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Correction. I see no advantages at all in us leaving. I prefer us to stay in and push hard for the reforms that are needed. I don't want a referendum on this, or anything else. I want Parliament to do it's job and if it cannot to resign and for us to elect another. Do you honestly think Britain 1 of 27 can change anything. Cameron tried and failed which is why we are were we are
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Think you need a subscription to the FT to access that link, Becky. I think many farmers didn’t vote for a no deal exit, they voted for a managed exit. The head of the national farmers union is very clear on her grave concerns about the disaster of a no deal exit for the entire industry. Precisely. We need to leave, but we don't need to leave on no deal. Leaving on a managed deal is not 'not leaving'. That, is a fact. Customs Union comes closest to remaining, and for that reason I can't see that version happening. Will no doubt end up being some sort of frankensteined May deal, with an extension into 2020. The more I think about it the more I think a second ref is unlikely, or at least a one with no deal and deal as the only two options. Can't see the politicos putting the most feared option on the table to the plebs again. Too risky. And to those surprised at the continuing obfuscation – you can't say there is a corrupt political elite making decisions for themselves one minute then expect them to simply ratify something like this without a hitch the next. Naive at best. Makes me laugh - hating the system because it’s protecting its own interests then expecting the same system to implement something that goes against the grain. As long as we do leave, I can't see room for complaint. You can wish you had a harder, softer or no brexit at all, but the result of the vote will have been honoured. Choosing 'leave' did not mean 'no deal'. Considering the vote split had the option been 'Leave with no deal on WTO terms' Remain would probably have won. So every cloud. And that's that
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
You constantly make it obvious. Secondly, it's a HOL colloquialism. Another obvious fact that you seem to have missed. They're adding up Cop out bender is a HOL colloquialism? Hmmmmmm. Ok, well thanks for the heads up on that, TUX. Saying "you constantly make it obvious" is as compelling an argument as saying "leave means leave". It means nothing at all, and is not grounded in any kind of realism.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
This is a very simplistic way to examine the cost/benefits of EU membership. You cannot really boil it down to simple in and out financials of this nature. We also enjoy many tariff and trade benefits as a member of the customs union and single market. There are benefits that are hard to quantify financially until we dont have them anymore. As we are yet to actually leave the EU, the true financial situation will not be known until the point at which that happens, and the ensuing years. So Carney and Hammond have lied then? They have assured us that we will be in financial meltdown....should we prosecute?
|
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Precisely. We need to leave, but we don't need to leave on no deal. Leaving on a managed deal is not 'not leaving'. That, is a fact. Customs Union comes closest to remaining, and for that reason I can't see that version happening. Will no doubt end up being some sort of frankensteined May deal, with an extension into 2020. The more I think about it the more I think a second ref is unlikely, or at least a one with no deal and deal as the only two options. Can't see the politicos putting the most feared option on the table to the plebs again. Too risky. And to those surprised at the continuing obfuscation – you can't say there is a corrupt political elite making decisions for themselves one minute then expect them to simply ratify something like this without a hitch the next. Naive at best. Makes me laugh - hating the system because it’s protecting its own interests then expecting the same system to implement something that goes against the grain. As long as we do leave, I can't see room for complaint. You can wish you had a harder, softer or no brexit at all, but the result of the vote will have been honoured. Choosing 'leave' did not mean 'no deal'. Considering the vote split had the option been 'Leave with no deal on WTO terms' Remain would probably have won. So every cloud. And that's that May's WA deal is DOA. It wont come back, it is an ex-deal. That leaves 2 choices on the next referendum. Revoke article 50, or remain. Everyone who cries murder from the hills about respecting democracy must understand that people did not explicitly vote for no deal on 2016. Given the enormous consequences to the economy and peace in Ireland, it would be totally undemocratic to foist no deal on the public. Parliament will find no majority to revoke, nor to leave with no deal. Bercow will ensure no deal will only happen if supported by a majority in parliament. Ergo, if parliament cannot pick between the 2 options (it really will be binary this time) then the people must decide for no deal, or to revoke. Democracy applies in 2019 just like it did in 2016. The will of the electorate must be respected on a no deal exit. If it is the will of the people, so be it, lets crash out. If it is not, then this must be respected.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by becky
Yet Farmers in the South West voted for Brexit invery large numbers - mainly because they see this as an opportunity to escape from the rigidity of EU 'box ticking', as this article explains..... They did. According to a LibDem Councillor I spoke with who had taken her seat from UKIP they are now changing their minds in droves.
|
|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Precisely. We need to leave, but we don't need to leave on no deal. Leaving on a managed deal is not 'not leaving'. That, is a fact. Customs Union comes closest to remaining, and for that reason I can't see that version happening. Will no doubt end up being some sort of frankensteined May deal, with an extension into 2020. The more I think about it the more I think a second ref is unlikely, or at least a one with no deal and deal as the only two options. Can't see the politicos putting the most feared option on the table to the plebs again. Too risky. And to those surprised at the continuing obfuscation – you can't say there is a corrupt political elite making decisions for themselves one minute then expect them to simply ratify something like this without a hitch the next. Naive at best. Makes me laugh - hating the system because it’s protecting its own interests then expecting the same system to implement something that goes against the grain. As long as we do leave, I can't see room for complaint. You can wish you had a harder, softer or no brexit at all, but the result of the vote will have been honoured. Choosing 'leave' did not mean 'no deal'. Considering the vote split had the option been 'Leave with no deal on WTO terms' Remain would probably have won. So every cloud. And that's that I'd not quite looked at it this way. You do come across as a balanced voice in a tribal atmosphere. To me remaining makes little sense, as it goes against the majority vote. Those voices and that fact aren't going away just because some close their eyes to it, that's true even if the vote is 'somehow' overturned. It's a reality that remainers need to face. At the same time though, this 'f*ck em all off', boo hiss EU attitude is shortsighted. Ultimately we have more in common with our European partners than those elsewhere around the world and so logically it makes little sense to dismiss them or for the relationship between us to become more and more hostile. A sensible and reciprocal attitude with close European nations, where we have control over immigration policy makes a hell of a lot more sense than this, 'f*ck the EU, think of the opportunities in Guam' style attitude. A balanced exit 'if possible' is not the end of the world, and so I hope the EU and UK can achieve that, rather that this gungho complete and sudden exit strategy. I've travelled around a bit in Europe lately, and while views vary I've come across a few people in countries that clearly are a hair's breadth different to our own who seem to think we actively dislike them and what they stand for. I don't want out allegiances, or indeed or union to increasingly fragment, and so acknowledge that comprises need to be made on all sides. Sometimes to compromise can indicate acceptable of a reality, rather than demonstration of weakness. The hysteria and endless dragging on of this process due to our failing punch and judy party system is obscuring basic realities. A personal flavour of 'leave' from a menu is less important than actually just getting on and doing it. Edited by dollardays (30 May 2019 12.00am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
They're looking to recoup some of these losses by picking on Italy and handing them a 3.5billion fine for doing nothing more than France and Germany have done in the past.........fine-free?
Italy will be next to leave after we leave then France. Watch the whole s***shack of cards come crumbling down
Pro USA & Israel |
|
[Tweet Link]
[Tweet Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by dollardays
I'd not quite looked at it this way. You do come across as a balanced voice in a tribal atmosphere. To me remaining makes little sense, as it goes against the majority vote. Those voices and that fact aren't going away just because some close their eyes to it, that's true even if the vote is 'somehow' overturned. It's a reality that remainers need to face. At the same time though, this 'f*ck em all off', boo hiss EU attitude is shortsighted. Ultimately we have more in common with our European partners than those elsewhere around the world and so logically it makes little sense to dismiss them or for the relationship between us to become more and more hostile. A sensible and reciprocal attitude with close European nations, where we have control over immigration policy makes a hell of a lot more sense than this, 'f*ck the EU, think of the opportunities in Guam' style attitude. A balanced exit 'if possible' is not the end of the world, and so I hope the EU and UK can achieve that, rather that this gungho complete and sudden exit strategy. I've travelled around a bit in Europe lately, and while views vary I've come across a few people in countries that clearly are a hair's breadth different to our own who seem to think we actively dislike them and what they stand for. I don't want out allegiances, or indeed or union to increasingly fragment, and so acknowledge that comprises need to be made on all sides. Sometimes to compromise can indicate acceptable of a reality, rather than demonstration of weakness. The hysteria and endless dragging on of this process due to our failing punch and judy party system is obscuring basic realities. A personal flavour of 'leave' from a menu is less important than actually just getting on and doing it. Edited by dollardays (30 May 2019 12.00am) Apart from the USA of course!!!!!!!
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Apart from the USA of course!!!!!!! That's a good point actually! The ever questioned special relationship still certainly means something to me, and I suspect countless Brits and Americans alike.
|
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Piers (huge t*** - I hope personal insults to dicks like Piers Morgan are allowed here) is correct, no one voted for a deal. No one voted for a deal, or no deal. No one voted for Norway plus. No one voted for any specifics, just to leave. That is exactly the problem, so for once that massive dick Piers Morgan hit the nail on the head. He's an annoyance at times, because he's essentially always looking to play the role of 'click-bait headline' in any discussion. By which I mean that he'll say whatever he needs to get noticed at the time, wherever it's left or right. It's about coverage not beliefs for him. One minute he's slagging off someone on the left, then the right, then smoking a spliff in a Mike Tyson podcast. It's entertaining, but it's about him rather than the nation.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
They did. According to a LibDem Councillor I spoke with who had taken her seat from UKIP they are now changing their minds in droves. Your usual nonsense. All just lies and propaganda.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
This is a very simplistic way to examine the cost/benefits of EU membership. You cannot really boil it down to simple in and out financials of this nature. We also enjoy many tariff and trade benefits as a member of the customs union and single market. There are benefits that are hard to quantify financially until we dont have them anymore. As we are yet to actually leave the EU, the true financial situation will not be known until the point at which that happens, and the ensuing years. The thing is the £350/£260m figure can & has been quantified, ask yourself this would having £350m or £260m written on the side of a bus (a bus that no one actually cares about) make any difference to how people voted?
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
|
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
The thing is the £350/£260m figure can & has been quantified, ask yourself this would having £350m or £260m written on the side of a bus (a bus that no one actually cares about) make any difference to how people voted? 3 lies. Lie 1 - the figure. Lie 2 - the NHS piece. Lie 3 - dumbing down the entire topic by conflating a number which has many intangibles connected to it with domestic spending when they are totally unrelated, creating a false connection.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
3 lies. Lie 1 - the figure. Lie 2 - the NHS piece. Lie 3 - dumbing down the entire topic by conflating a number which has many intangibles connected to it with domestic spending when they are totally unrelated, creating a false connection. Do we give money to the EU . YES
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.