ho hum, another day goes by, another day closer to the revocation of article 50.

Here is the idiot's guide, step by step. Revocation for dummies one might say.

1 - Bercow will not allow a new PM to unilaterally trigger a no deal exit.

ho hum, another day goes by, another day closer to the revocation of article 50.

Here is the idiot's guide, step by step. Revocation for dummies one might say.

1 - Bercow will not allow a new PM to unilaterally trigger a no deal exit.
Agreed it has to be a vote in Parliament my concern is that Bercow will try and skew the form of vote.

2 - Parliament will not sanction no deal on their own.
Not so sure about this. The DUP have indicated they would vote for a no deal as long as they are treated the same as the rest of the UK. May's deal didn't do that. In addition many Tory MPs who don't support a no deal will have to face the reality of de-selection by their own party or by the voters. Survival instincts may take over.

3 - The EU will not fancy yet another extension, and neither will the new PM.
Agreed. Unless there is a deal on that table that everybody is happy with and they have just run out of time I don't see an extension.

4 - With about 1 month to go, the new PM will realize they cannot force through no deal.
See point 2 you maybe right but too soon to tell.

5 - The new PM will call for the only option left, a new vote.
If it's stalemate in the commons and Boris is PM I think we could get a GE. I think once he is PM the Tory vote will recover.

6 - All parties will agree to an extension, given the assurance of a new vote.
Maybe but what's the question, that will decide who supports it.

7 - The electoral college will insist on a remain option, if no deal goes on there.
You mean Electoral Commission and yes I agree if it's another referendum it's back to my answer to point 6. I don't see a fair question that will satisfy all parties and the Electoral Commission and the courts because they're will be legal challenges.

8 - There is no way on God's green earth that more people want a no deal crash out of the EU, than want to remain now.
That's a guess, your probably right but if it's the only option on the table because the EU refuses to negotiate I think it will happen. Note Labour's policy is based on doing a deal with the EU that is better than May's. If the EU stands firm and say no new deal then I think uncommitted people will switch to Leave because the EU forces them to.

9 - Brexit will get cancelled.
At this stage I would say a no deal Brexit is more likely.

10 - There will be some level of social disorder for a few weeks, then it will go back to chats in pubs and coffee shops, and the brexiteers will bide their time until a new leader or two comes along who can once again trick the masses into thinking leaving the EU will benefit them.

Once we leave we have a lovely trade deal coming from the Yanks! Yay.

This web page is from the US Govt Office of the US Trade Representative includes a public hearing on the objectives

[Link]

Link to panel discussion: [Link]

Page 268 of the PDF of the panel discussion includes the statements copied below from the Brian Toohey, the representative of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturing association of America.

He is saying that what the US pharmaceutical industry wants is for full access to US drugs and for the UK Health Service to pay more for them as they are depressing prices through their purchasing power and aren't paying a premium for "innovation" which they should be for a US UK trade agreement.

I can hardly wait.

"...First, negotiations should build on common ground to ensure transparency and due process for approving, pricing, and reimbursing pharmaceuticals. In the U.K., the government is a primary payer for medicines and, in effect, dictates prices. This dominant position often results in the U.K. failing to appropriately recognize the value of innovation in its pricing reimbursement systems, and, instead, engage in actions that distort markets and artificially depress prices. With these concerns in mind, PhRMA welcomes the administration's continued focus on the problem of advanced economies undervaluing innovative medicines. These provide an important opportunity, consistent with TPA, to ensure government regulatory reimbursement regimes are transparent, non discriminatory, and provide procedural fairness and full market access for U.S. products, which includes the setting of reimbursement amount on competitive market-derived pricing, or an equivalent process, such as one that appropriately recognized the value of an innovative product...."

Once we leave we have a lovely trade deal coming from the Yanks! Yay.

This web page is from the US Govt Office of the US Trade Representative includes a public hearing on the objectives

[Link]

Link to panel discussion: [Link]

Page 268 of the PDF of the panel discussion includes the statements copied below from the Brian Toohey, the representative of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturing association of America.

He is saying that what the US pharmaceutical industry wants is for full access to US drugs and for the UK Health Service to pay more for them as they are depressing prices through their purchasing power and aren't paying a premium for "innovation" which they should be for a US UK trade agreement.

I can hardly wait.

"...First, negotiations should build on common ground to ensure transparency and due process for approving, pricing, and reimbursing pharmaceuticals. In the U.K., the government is a primary payer for medicines and, in effect, dictates prices. This dominant position often results in the U.K. failing to appropriately recognize the value of innovation in its pricing reimbursement systems, and, instead, engage in actions that distort markets and artificially depress prices. With these concerns in mind, PhRMA welcomes the administration's continued focus on the problem of advanced economies undervaluing innovative medicines. These provide an important opportunity, consistent with TPA, to ensure government regulatory reimbursement regimes are transparent, non discriminatory, and provide procedural fairness and full market access for U.S. products, which includes the setting of reimbursement amount on competitive market-derived pricing, or an equivalent process, such as one that appropriately recognized the value of an innovative product...."

Really? But everything was in black and white. Got a link?

So why arnt the left out protesting now.

And you sir, are too thick to understand the following:

Parliament will not sanction a no deal exit on their own
No one wants another extension, not least the EU

Therefore there is only one way out of this, another vote. If you really want to crash out of the EU overnight, it would have to be voted on because parliament are not going to do that.

We are being backed into a corner. We will be desperate for markets post Brexit. My old employer very clearly intended and intends to subsume the most lucrative elements of the NHS.

In addition there is no doubt we will be forced to accept US meat. A race to the bottom. Americans always believe the American way is best and the sooner we simply accept that and become one of its States the better. Ot maybe four of its States.