This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Wonderful use of jargon but please explain how creating electronic money does not automatically lead to inflation. He's saying there wouldn't be as much wage rise inflation because there's spare labour to be hired, and hand in hand there's not the cause of wage cost/product cost inflation. Plus their propensity to spend on essentials is high. If I or the local council hire the out of work gardener instead of the gardener up to his eyeballs in work, it costs me or the local council less and not putting up the cost of coffee or sandwiches in the local park cafe. QE is going to lead to some inflation, but if the interest rates are low to begin with, it's more manageable. It also obviously decreases the value of currency so is good for exports, bad for imports.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
He's saying there wouldn't be as much wage rise inflation because there's spare labour to be hired, and hand in hand there's not the cause of wage cost/product cost inflation. Plus their propensity to spend on essentials is high. If I or the local council hire the out of work gardener instead of the gardener up to his eyeballs in work, it costs me or the local council less and not putting up the cost of coffee or sandwiches in the local park cafe. QE is going to lead to some inflation, but if the interest rates are low to begin with, it's more manageable. It also obviously decreases the value of currency so is good for exports, bad for imports. That's It? I'd like someone who claims to 'know' about this stuff to tell me in detail why I'm wrong, ideally without jargon.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That's It? I'd like someone who claims to 'know' about this stuff to tell me in detail why I'm wrong, ideally without jargon. There are lots of people earning n&ff all in employment, zero hours contracts, or next to n&ff all in 'self employment.' By that I mean trying to start a new business that'll ultimately fail, rather than delivery drivers and such like. You wanted to hear why you're wrong. Cambridge or I haven't said electronic money doesn't create inflation. It's just not as severe and easier to deal with in the market situations and opportunity he has highlighted. Quick reply? We're not anticipating a quick reply mate. Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 May 2017 5.59pm) Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 May 2017 6.02pm)
COYP |
|
|
Only an hour? A bit weak.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Providers of goods and services now set prices by what people are prepared or able to pay rather than percentage of profit. There must be a knock on. . What about price competition. A consumer won't be prepared to pay more when he can get the same for less down the road.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
There are lots of people earning n&ff all in employment, zero hours contracts, or next to n&ff all in 'self employment.' By that I mean trying to start a new business that'll ultimately fail, rather than delivery drivers and such like. You wanted to hear why you're wrong. Cambridge or I haven't said electronic money doesn't create inflation. It's just not as severe and easier to deal with in the market situations and opportunity he has highlighted. Quick reply? We're not anticipating a quick reply mate. Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 May 2017 5.59pm) Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 May 2017 6.02pm) Ha ha. OK, so your argument is about degree.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Only an hour? A bit weak. Quality not quantity.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
There are lots of people earning n&ff all in employment, zero hours contracts, or next to n&ff all in 'self employment.' By that I mean trying to start a new business that'll ultimately fail, rather than delivery drivers and such like. You wanted to hear why you're wrong. Cambridge or I haven't said electronic money doesn't create inflation. It's just not as severe and easier to deal with in the market situations and opportunity he has highlighted. Quick reply? We're not anticipating a quick reply mate. Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 May 2017 5.59pm) Edited by Rudi Hedman (19 May 2017 6.02pm) I don't wish to join the debate, or in any way upset you, but I have a genuine question. Do we have to censor the word "naff" on here?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
What about price competition. A consumer won't be prepared to pay more when he can get the same for less down the road. There is obviously a limit to undercutting determined by costs. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (19 May 2017 7.52pm)
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Shadow Chancellor on means testing the fuel allowance: Edited by hedgehog50 (19 May 2017 7.31pm) It has been said many times (although not lately I admit) so I'll type it in caps so it sinks in. IT WILL COST MORE TO ADMINISTER THAN IT WILL SAVE.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Rumbled by a 9 year old. [Tweet Link]
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
It has been said many times (although not lately I admit) so I'll type it in caps so it sinks in. IT WILL COST MORE TO ADMINISTER THAN IT WILL SAVE. SCRAP IT ALTOGETHER THEN
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Ha ha. OK, so your argument is about degree. You could have 0.01% inflation vs 1%. The points Cambridge is making I didn't like the idea of in 2008 for a few years but it is more appropriate now because there is consistent growth worldwide, room for expansion here, and monetary policy tools at the chancellor's disposal to counteract the negative effects of government spending/borrowing.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
I don't wish to join the debate, or in any way upset you, but I have a genuine question. Do we have to censor the word "naff" on here? Nerk.
COYP |
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
This election has just got interesting really quickly. Labour are now polling on the same figures as Blair's majority government. Their manifesto has symbolically crushed the ghosts of Blair while Corbyn himself is whipping up political crowds unheard of in this country's recent history. Meanwhile, the Tories, while significantly ahead, are falling apart. May can't even confirm who her chancellor will be, yet she's standing on a strong and stable platform! They've alienated huge numbers of journalists, as well as their one main demographic: pensioners. The neoliberal wing of the party are s***ting it about the immigration cap's effect on the economy, the whole manifesto seems totally uncosted, and suddenly life long tory voters are pledging for Labour.
So Labour are going to win are they? Do you want a bet on it?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
There is obviously a limit to undercutting determined by costs. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (19 May 2017 7.52pm) But that is not businesses charging what they want/what they think customers will pay (what you said). That is determining price by profit margin, which is what you said they don't do these days. No they don't. Businesses generally try to squeeze the competition by price.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
This election has just got interesting really quickly. Labour are now polling on the same figures as Blair's majority government. Their manifesto has symbolically crushed the ghosts of Blair while Corbyn himself is whipping up political crowds unheard of in this country's recent history. Meanwhile, the Tories, while significantly ahead, are falling apart. May can't even confirm who her chancellor will be, yet she's standing on a strong and stable platform! They've alienated huge numbers of journalists, as well as their one main demographic: pensioners. The neoliberal wing of the party are s***ting it about the immigration cap's effect on the economy, the whole manifesto seems totally uncosted, and suddenly life long tory voters are pledging for Labour.
NOT all of us my friend.
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.