This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's almost as if protectionism is the intelligent thing to do if you have the right resources and can implement it properly. Go figure.....No one needed to tell that to China certainly. Uncontrolled globalisation just fecks over your own working class and gives away your own countries industries......the only people who benefit long term are the economic Neo Liberals in the middle and higher classes.....those ones whose only allegiance is to themselves.....until they need you for something. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Jul 2019 8.53pm) As I explained in another thread that isn't universally true. If your country is poor and has mass unemployment then it's the working class who benefit. Industries arrive. Globalisation is flattening out opportunity. It's impact has to be managed to ensure smooth transitions and avoid social disruptions. It might be a challenge but as it simply cannot just be reversed we have no choice other than to try to go with the flow and find smart ways to benefit. I read lots of complaints and desires to turn the clocks back decades but no practical, legal, suggestions on how to handle things better. Just turning off immigration won't do much other than hurt us. Those who believe there is a pool of locally born labour, trained, willing and ready to step into the breech are living in a dream land.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| W12 03 Jul 19 12.45pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I explained in another thread that isn't universally true. If your country is poor and has mass unemployment then it's the working class who benefit. Industries arrive. Globalisation is flattening out opportunity. It's impact has to be managed to ensure smooth transitions and avoid social disruptions. It might be a challenge but as it simply cannot just be reversed we have no choice other than to try to go with the flow and find smart ways to benefit. I read lots of complaints and desires to turn the clocks back decades but no practical, legal, suggestions on how to handle things better. Just turning off immigration won't do much other than hurt us. Those who believe there is a pool of locally born labour, trained, willing and ready to step into the breech are living in a dream land. You are completely ignoring the reality of the massive cultural and security/crime issues we are already seeing (much of which is already having to be suppressed by the mainstream media, de-ranked by social media etc) . You cannot expect to mix large groups of people with antithetical beliefs and value systems (e.g. western individual rights v 3rd world group preference) and expect a peaceful outcome. It's blinkered madness to expect we can "manage" this as at some point we will not even be in control. Why would we do this anyway other than to pander to the large corporations need to drive down the cost of wages and just keep the economy afloat purely due to the over inflated cost of property? Sure it would probably happen over time (centuries or millennia) anyway once the world has normalized western values but over the course of a couple of decades?! No human civilization will never be able to cope with that rate of change.
|
|
| ChrisGC |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Yeah, it does seem that way and this is the point I'm trying to make. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (27 Jun 2019 11.16am) No need for sterilisation anyway. You're dealing with masses of people, literally billions, unable to work out that boiling water sterilises it. Stop aid and stop migration and they'd soon die out.
|
|
|
I think Thanos was on to something.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Back to Brexit Corbyn today hinted in PMQ's he has shifted position and now wants a second referendum. I think this is good news as it puts daylight between the parties, not good news if you are a Brexit Labour supporter of course. At least now the public have a clear choice who to support. This matters because I think we will have a GE in the next few months. Good then we can rid ourselves of this odious self serving jew hating old t***.
|
|
| W12 03 Jul 19 9.44pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Good then we can rid ourselves of this odious self serving jew hating old t***. I guess that splits the remain vote between labour, green and the libtards which is great news. Still need to bring down the tories to be sure of a Brexit party win. Hunt it is then! Edited by W12 (03 Jul 2019 9.45pm)
|
|
| ChrisGC |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That'll keep Maple happy. Whereas for us it's pure clown world and long term self harming....unless these are strictly time limited and citizen settlement status is off the table. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Jul 2019 3.53pm) Why should it be off the table? This is exactly the sort of immigration that should be encouraged! Forget the return bit. I'm all for necessary and enriching immigration.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ChrisGC
Why should it be off the table? This is exactly the sort of immigration that should be encouraged! Forget the return bit. I'm all for necessary and enriching immigration.
I wish to live in a country that is for the English and has a majority of English in it.....I think every country has a right to that hegemonic self defining reality....and indeed it's only in Europe where this is even questioned. If you continue with an immigration policy that doesn't reflect the requirement to maintain that country's internal hegemony then ultimately you create social and cultural upheaval, segregation by house price and other means.....ultimately the higher the multi-cultural mix the higher the malcontent. So I'm for the immigration policies of countries such as Japan or Israel, where citizenship for foreigners is difficult and rules keep them as secondary.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I wish to live in a country that is for the English and has a majority of English in it.....I think every country has a right to that hegemonic self defining reality....and indeed it's only in Europe where this is even questioned. If you continue with an immigration policy that doesn't reflect the requirement to maintain that country's internal hegemony then ultimately you create social and cultural upheaval, segregation by house price and other means.....ultimately the higher the multi-cultural mix the higher the malcontent. So I'm for the immigration policies of countries such as Japan or Israel, where citizenship for foreigners is difficult and rules keep them as secondary.
Indeed. And when Parliament eventually has a majority of non Europeans in it, we won't even have control of our own country. In fact, with our system, it will happen a long time before that.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I wish to live in a country that is for the English and has a majority of English in it.....I think every country has a right to that hegemonic self defining reality....and indeed it's only in Europe where this is even questioned. If you continue with an immigration policy that doesn't reflect the requirement to maintain that country's internal hegemony then ultimately you create social and cultural upheaval, segregation by house price and other means.....ultimately the higher the multi-cultural mix the higher the malcontent. So I'm for the immigration policies of countries such as Japan or Israel, where citizenship for foreigners is difficult and rules keep them as secondary.
Uh oh. Hmmmm. North Korea?
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Indeed. And when Parliament eventually has a majority of non Europeans in it, we won't even have control of our own country. In fact, with our system, it will happen a long time before that. Where to begin. So Europeans are ok now? It’s the non Europeans we have an issue with?
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You should read your links Maine. There is nothing inconsistent with what Japan is doing. They are increasing the numbers of 'foreign workers' but they aren't allowing them a path to citizenship.....once the permit ends....bye bye foreigner. The 'foreign worker' idea is thousands of years old and I have no issues with it....as long as it is implemented properly....They can do that in Japan because a non Japanese person is far easier to spot. Anyway hence Japan stays Japanese and keeps its culture and inherent Japanese nature. As for Israel.....Duh Maine....Israel is composed of mostly European Jews who emigrated there last century. They aren't going to lose their Jewishness by allowing more Jews to emigrate there are they. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Jul 2019 11.58am) Japan literally just changed its policies and if being a citizen is your issue then how is letting in people of the same religion ok for you ala Israel? Not sure you picked the best 2 cases there but what do you think about my suggestion, NK? You need to pick your issue, is it race, religion, nationality or are you going for the hat trick? Plenty of the migrants you have an issue with in the UK are Christians, Stirly.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Happy July 4TH. 242 years since the USA left the UK without a trade agreement !!
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Japan literally just changed its policies and if being a citizen is your issue then how is letting in people of the same religion ok for you ala Israel? Well I'm an agnostic atheist. However the heritage of this country is Christian and sure it would count in someone's favour. However, it's a number's game. I don't believe in closing off immigration I believe in a country not losing its identity....and so it must have at least a 3 to 1 numeric advantage I'd say....pretty much what Israel is keeping in place....complete with business and land ownership being kept in the country or to nationals. Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Not sure you picked the best 2 cases there but what do you think about my suggestion, NK? I think they are great examples of what I mean. Originally posted by Maine Eagle
You need to pick your issue, is it race, religion, nationality or are you going for the hat trick? Plenty of the migrants you have an issue with in the UK are Christians, Stirly. It's not about 'picking an issue' it's about protecting the identity of a country. As Japan are doing, as Israel are doing.....In fact, as most countries outside of western Europe are doing. It's only the west who have middle class and elites who appear to think otherwise.....certain elites anyway.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Happy July 4TH. 242 years since the USA left the UK without a trade agreement !!
Pay your frigging tax! Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Jul 2019 1.06pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
This is one area where holding the middle ground doesn't work. Pick a side Labour, pick a side. Yep, no one respects the two faced......Most of their grass roots are remain so they should go fully remain and start being honest. Either that or fill your shadow bench with Labour leavers....if you can find enough. Stop flapping about and pick a side.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.