This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I agree no-one knows. Certainly not Bogus Johnson. I don't think the DUP will break with the Tories but I do believe that there is likely to be a significant group of Tories who will put country before party at this time if a no deal outcome is the alternative. I think there is a growing mood within Labour that they need to replace Corbyn if they are to secure power so don't be surprised if something happens in the coming few weeks to achieve that in time. But I am only speculating too. Don't you mean "themselves before country"?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
But it isn't is it? It's full of government statements about what to expect and how to prepare. It doesn't offer opinion. Any picture it paints is an objective one. As such this is more like a photograph than a piece of abstract art which needs interpretation and can be seen by different people in different ways. These are facts, not opinions and people need to start being honest about them and not trying to bury them under a "project fear" label and hope they will just disappear. Be honest. If you are prepared to put up with the disruption and cost this will all result in, because you believe we will be better off eventually, than say so. So, there I have said it
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Don't you mean "themselves before country"? No I don't because those that do will toe the party line and hope not to be deselected and lose their jobs. Those that vote against the whip risk not only being deselected but having the whip removed. Not all will be brave enough to do so, and they are the ones who will be putting themselves before country if they really are against a no deal exit.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
What a refreshing comment at a time when so many others have already made their minds up that we are doomed, based on absolutely nothing but their existing prejudice. My only complaint at the moment is that I'd like to see less photo opportunities of our Prime Minister holding chickens as it really isn't necessary Isn't that what got us in this mess in the first place?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Primarily the fact that it's all doom and gloom and painting a picture of the worst possible scenario which is typical BBC I don’t agree that it is though; that’s why I was asking about specific examples. This board basically seems to be at the moment; I don’t agree with this article, it must be biased/fake news. I mean, someone sent a BBC link the other day titled ‘Labour to back remain’ and said that was biased reporting - it’s bonkers. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (31 Jul 2019 2.18pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
The article was deliberately written to appeal to people like yourself who are so close minded that they aren't interested in any other viewpoint apart from their own. Everyone has the right to understand the impact of a no deal Brexit but reading biased articles like that one won't help at all
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
And two of those were non EU. Europe has more to lose than us without a deal, however the difference is that their loss is spread over twenty plus countries and therefore will have less impact on any one particular nation.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It would be “unthinkable” if a no-deal Brexit was not followed by a poll on Irish reunification, the leader of Sinn Féin has warned Boris Johnson, also telling the prime minister that no one believed he was impartial on Northern Ireland. Things warming up for the self-appointed 'Minister of the Union'....
And of course those Loyalists. Bound to just sit back and accept rule from Dublin without kicking up a fuss and even if they did, then so what? The Irish Army are more than up to the task of dealing with them. If there is a no-deal Brexit then a united Ireland is absolute pie in the sky. Primarily because the South simply could not afford it.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It would be “unthinkable” if a no-deal Brexit was not followed by a poll on Irish reunification, the leader of Sinn Féin has warned Boris Johnson, also telling the prime minister that no one believed he was impartial on Northern Ireland. Things warming up for the self-appointed 'Minister of the Union'....
We'll never die |
|
|
Originally posted by corkery
Ha good old Sinn Fein. They want the Brits out yet want to be under the yolk of a far more sinister organisation.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Ha good old Sinn Fein. They want the Brits out yet want to be under the yolk of a far more sinister organisation. Always struck me as a complete mystery why 'nationalist' organisations like the SNP seem so keen on swapping one version of what they see as servitude for another. The desire for self-determination I get. I loathe foreign institutions having any say over UK law. And I get why people might vote for the SNP if they believe Scotland would be better off if it had the ability to make its own laws and decide its own fate. But how and why that now seems so tied up with this idea that the EU is the answer to all of their problems is utterly beyond me. Yes, the history between all of us home nations and/or Ireland hardly makes for the most pleasant of reading at time but we also share a lot of common bonds and cultural values. The average punter in Dublin or Glasgow has so much more in common with their equivalent in Birmingham or Bristol (I will leave London out because that is in a category of its own now that neither Scotland or Ireland have anything even close to) than anybody in Europe yet seemingly nationalists in both would rather tie their future to Brussels or Berlin. I cannot help but think that a chip on their shoulders lays at the bottom of this all. They simply hate living in England's shadow and would rather swap that darkness for a similar gloomy one but emanating from Brussels. They lack the confidence to actually try and make it on their own.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by corkery
Hasn't Ireland been on the considerable net take from the EU for decades? What makes Ireland such a catch? Without that EU money how would Ireland be doing? I rather suspect that the Irish nationalists just prefer being ruled by Germans as long as it comes with a cheque. As long as they still get to wave the flag and drink Guinness. That's their choice but that's what it looks like. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jul 2019 11.25pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Hasn't Ireland been on the considerable net take from the EU for decades? What makes Ireland such a catch? Without that EU money how would Ireland be doing? Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jul 2019 11.25pm) Not for the past five years. So apparently quite well The US is HIGHLY supportive of the ROI
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Not for the past five years. So apparently quite well The US is HIGHLY supportive of the ROI Apparently Ireland has received more than 50 billion from the EU since 1973....which we would have probably done more than 10 billion of. So it's good that they are finally paying tiny amounts back in now. I have no idea why you mentioned the US.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Apparently Ireland has received more than 50 billion from the EU since 1973....which we would have probably done more than 10 billion of. So it's good that they are finally paying tiny amounts back in now. I have no idea why you mentioned the US. Because the Government actively encourages US investment into Ireland. It has a very strong sugar daddy.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Because the Government actively encourages US investment into Ireland. It has a very strong sugar daddy. Well good for the Paddies.....They don't rule them though do they.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| W12 01 Aug 19 12.14pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dollardays
1133 days since the Brexit vote and still sweet FA has happened. There have, I would imagine, been more enjoyable comas. Whether October, or via GE, or whenever, I think at this point anyone but a sadomasochist should be pleased when we turn the page. Boris looks more steadfast, which may twist the arms that matter. But who knows, my crystal ball packed up a long time ago. What should be evident though is that Theresa May suited no-one. Remainers didn't like her because she was negotiating to leave, and leavers didn't like her because her heart clearly wasn't into leaving, so she was the opposite of a formidable negotiator. At least Boris is taking a position and so the outcome could be different. Time will tell. Edited by dollardays (01 Aug 2019 1.57am) I'm a rabid leaver and have absolutely no confidence in Boris Johnson. The game is rigged so we need a new game.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.