This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
I agree, either that or you have totally missed the point. Ahhh, i see
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Sadly we now live in a society where it is trial by media. 1. It was a sketchy recording. You only hear a few mins of a 14 Edited by eaglesdare (22 Aug 2023 11.23am) You might want to hear the bit about Man U doing their own investigating and seeing footage not accessible to the media and making a decision based off of that... I would estimate if they could get away with saying it was make up and dirty talk to hold on to a very talented footballer worth millions... then they would. Time is a good healer but the decision is correct for both parties. Him staying in the media spotlight in the UK will be as good for his mental health as dipping your balls in lava. Hopefully he will learn from this and build on becoming a better person if the footage and audio is true.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CpfcWeTrust1
You might want to hear the bit about Man U doing their own investigating and seeing footage not accessible to the media and making a decision based off of that... I would estimate if they could get away with saying it was make up and dirty talk to hold on to a very talented footballer worth millions... then they would. Time is a good healer but the decision is correct for both parties. Him staying in the media spotlight in the UK will be as good for his mental health as dipping your balls in lava. Hopefully he will learn from this and build on becoming a better person if the footage and audio is true. I quote from the statement from man u: "Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged."
Edited by eaglesdare (22 Aug 2023 11.43am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by CpfcWeTrust1
You might want to hear the bit about Man U doing their own investigating and seeing footage not accessible to the media and making a decision based off of that... I would estimate if they could get away with saying it was make up and dirty talk to hold on to a very talented footballer worth millions... then they would. Time is a good healer but the decision is correct for both parties. Him staying in the media spotlight in the UK will be as good for his mental health as dipping your balls in lava. Hopefully he will learn from this and build on becoming a better person if the footage and audio is true. Come to Woke land UK where lessons are regularly getting learnt or so we say. Lessons will be learnt Well I for one am sick of hearing it. Toughen up and move on.
|
|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
2. Not saying it was but has anyone never been with a woman who Edited by eaglesdare (22 Aug 2023 11.23am) My Wife once said "talk dirty to me " during sex , I dont think my reply of "that lampshade could do with a clean" is what she was looking for
|
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Rachel Riley makes the point I have been making. "The question before them [United] was not whether Mason Greenwood may be found guilty in a criminal, or even civil court, it was whether he's fit to wear the United badge, to be a role model to kids who look up to footballers as heroes, and have his name proudly displayed on shirts sold in the club shop," The reason he is "innocent" of the criminal charges is that the victim and up to a dozen other people (according to the media) refused to give statements to the police. Sorry Badger, but the reason he is "innocent" is that he hasn't been charged with a crime. Media reports are so dangerous in that nowadays the 'facts' are filtered to fit a story then wrapped in subjective opinion and presented as the whole truth. The ManU decision to let him go also does not look good, but they have been put in an impossible position. The nation now thinks o him as a scrote and guilty of a crime he has not been punished for and ManU's reputation has been affected. Edited by CrazyBadger (23 Aug 2023 11.39am)
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.