BBC (again)

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Visit the current forum | Forum Rules

Page 123 of 261 < 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 >

Spiderman Horsham 11 Mar 23 2.07pm
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle it gives them a chance to bring a bunch of new faces in at a lot less money & see if it has any impact on the viewing figures - I think this is what they will do. Perhaps it was their intention all along and were just waiting for an excuse

Spiderman

Horsham 11 Mar 23 2.07pm

Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

it gives them a chance to bring a bunch of new faces in at a lot less money & see if it has any impact on the viewing figures -

I think this is what they will do. Perhaps it was their intention all along and were just waiting for an excuse

Uphill Bedford 11 Mar 23 2.40pm
I for one will be relieved I won't have to listen to that great scorer but total nonentity pundit, Alan Shearer tonight. Nor Mr Wright or, indeed, the self satisfied Mr Lineker. The fact that many BBC employees are walking out in sympathy with Lineker indicates the left-wing faction in sports and show business.

Uphill

Bedford 11 Mar 23 2.40pm

I for one will be relieved I won't have to listen to that great scorer but total nonentity pundit, Alan Shearer tonight.
Nor Mr Wright or, indeed, the self satisfied Mr Lineker.

The fact that many BBC employees are walking out in sympathy with Lineker indicates the left-wing faction in sports and show business.

Hrolf The Ganger 11 Mar 23 2.43pm
Aside from anything else, it is absolute insanity when a group of celebrities is promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country, especially when an ever growing number are arriving here illegally. This is a country with finite resources and space, which has an existing population that should be the primary concern of any government. The insane, blind ideological lunacy the likes of Lineker spout is simply devoid of any foresight or intelligence. His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible.

Hrolf The Ganger

11 Mar 23 2.43pm

Aside from anything else, it is absolute insanity when a group of celebrities is promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country, especially when an ever growing number are arriving here illegally.

This is a country with finite resources and space, which has an existing population that should be the primary concern of any government.
The insane, blind ideological lunacy the likes of Lineker spout is simply devoid of any foresight or intelligence.

His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible.

inflikted 11 Mar 23 2.45pm
f*** the tories Milkshakes Against Fascism

inflikted

11 Mar 23 2.45pm

f*** the tories

Milkshakes Against Fascism

Hrolf The Ganger 11 Mar 23 2.47pm
Originally posted by inflikted f*** the tories Do you need a hug?

Hrolf The Ganger

11 Mar 23 2.47pm

Originally posted by inflikted

f*** the tories

Do you need a hug?

fishbone London 11 Mar 23 2.56pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Aside from anything else, it is absolute insanity when a group of celebrities is promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country, especially when an ever growing number are arriving here illegally. This is a country with finite resources and space, which has an existing population that should be the primary concern of any government. The insane, blind ideological lunacy the likes of Lineker spout is simply devoid of any foresight or intelligence. His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible. Jawhol mien fuhrer you are right

fishbone

London 11 Mar 23 2.56pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible.

Jawhol mien fuhrer you are right

cryrst The garden of England 11 Mar 23 3.01pm
Originally posted by inflikted f*** the tories Some I would and I do get a boner for labours Lisa nandy She’s well in the bank and I don’t really know why the labour bitch

cryrst

The garden of England 11 Mar 23 3.01pm

Originally posted by inflikted

f*** the tories

Some I would and I do get a boner for labours Lisa nandy
She’s well in the bank and I don’t really know why the labour bitch

cryrst The garden of England 11 Mar 23 3.04pm
Originally posted by fishbone Jawhol mien fuhrer you are right I just thought rodders and only fools when del gets with the blond sort. Classic. Auntie in bogner don’t even know them pmsl

cryrst

The garden of England 11 Mar 23 3.04pm

Originally posted by fishbone

Jawhol mien fuhrer you are right

I just thought rodders and only fools when del gets with the blond sort. Classic.
Auntie in bogner don’t even know them pmsl

inflikted 11 Mar 23 3.05pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Do you need a hug? Nah just the tories to f*** off out of the government and out of the BBC. Snowflakes who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism. Milkshakes Against Fascism

inflikted

11 Mar 23 3.05pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Do you need a hug?

Nah just the tories to f*** off out of the government and out of the BBC. Snowflakes who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism.

Milkshakes Against Fascism

inflikted 11 Mar 23 3.09pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible. If your children are that young and impressionable and you're letting them on twitter unsupervised, that's just bad parenting Edited by inflikted (11 Mar 2023 3.09pm) Milkshakes Against Fascism

inflikted

11 Mar 23 3.09pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible.

If your children are that young and impressionable and you're letting them on twitter unsupervised, that's just bad parenting

Edited by inflikted (11 Mar 2023 3.09pm)

Milkshakes Against Fascism

Dubai Eagle 11 Mar 23 3.10pm
I would imagine the first round of people getting fired will be the middle aged guys on the most money, once that is done the bbc can focus on getting rid of those remaining that seem to be causing the most trouble - the time gap will give those that don't earn so much to consider what they really want, a job or short lived publicity for biting the hand that feeds them. Originally posted by Spiderman I think this is what they will do. Perhaps it was their intention all along and were just waiting for an excuse

Dubai Eagle

11 Mar 23 3.10pm

I would imagine the first round of people getting fired will be the middle aged guys on the most money, once that is done the bbc can focus on getting rid of those remaining that seem to be causing the most trouble - the time gap will give those that don't earn so much to consider what they really want, a job or short lived publicity for biting the hand that feeds them.

Originally posted by Spiderman

I think this is what they will do. Perhaps it was their intention all along and were just waiting for an excuse

fishbone London 11 Mar 23 3.13pm
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle I would imagine the first round of people getting fired will be the middle aged guys on the most money, once that is done the bbc can focus on getting rid of those remaining that seem to be causing the most trouble - the time gap will give those that don't earn so much to consider what they really want, a job or short lived publicity for biting the hand that feeds them. Funny, that’s exactly what they done in Germany in the 1930s. How strange!

fishbone

London 11 Mar 23 3.13pm

Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

Funny, that’s exactly what they done in Germany in the 1930s.
How strange!

fishbone London 11 Mar 23 3.17pm
Originally posted by inflikted Nah just the tories to f*** off out of the government and out of the BBC. Snowflakes who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism.[/quote Well said!

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 23 3.33pm
Originally posted by Badger11 I hadn't seen that article but I do remember this one. [Link] Surprised you use the Guardian as a source! I thought they were a bigger devil than even the BBC. So you choose what is most accurate. An article in the Guardian in November 21 or verbatim statements directly from the BBC in June 22. He wasn't sacked before the Ashes. He wasn't included in the team and that's what the BBC said at the time. This though is all whataboutery. What's your reaction to my other comments? For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 23 3.33pm

Originally posted by Badger11

I hadn't seen that article but I do remember this one.

[Link]

Surprised you use the Guardian as a source! I thought they were a bigger devil than even the BBC. So you choose what is most accurate. An article in the Guardian in November 21 or verbatim statements directly from the BBC in June 22. He wasn't sacked before the Ashes. He wasn't included in the team and that's what the BBC said at the time.

This though is all whataboutery. What's your reaction to my other comments?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

fishbone London 11 Mar 23 3.36pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Surprised you use the Guardian as a source! I thought they were a bigger devil than even the BBC. So you choose what is most accurate. An article in the Guardian in November 21 or verbatim statements directly from the BBC in June 22. He wasn't sacked before the Ashes. He wasn't included in the team and that's what the BBC said at the time. This though is all whataboutery. What's your reaction to my other comments? Yeah! He should have read the sun or the daily mail innit!!

fishbone

London 11 Mar 23 3.36pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

This though is all whataboutery. What's your reaction to my other comments?

Yeah! He should have read the sun or the daily mail innit!!

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 23 4.00pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Aside from anything else, it is absolute insanity when a group of celebrities is promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country, especially when an ever growing number are arriving here illegally. This is a country with finite resources and space, which has an existing population that should be the primary concern of any government. The insane, blind ideological lunacy the likes of Lineker spout is simply devoid of any foresight or intelligence. His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible. You have a history of posting inane comments, but this one takes you to a new low. This has nothing at all to do with any "group of celebrities promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country". Firstly because no-one actually believes that. More importantly, even they did, it's not about that. This is about whether BBC employees, or contractors, have the right to express their opinions in their own time, on matters outside their area of responsibility. Whether you, I, Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage or Uncle Tom Cobley agree with their sentiments is irrelevant. One day someone will say things we do agree with and we cannot be selective. It's either OK, or it isn't. Your last sentence is truly mind-blowing. Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett? For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 23 4.00pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

His kind cannot be allowed to influence the young and gullible.

You have a history of posting inane comments, but this one takes you to a new low.

This has nothing at all to do with any "group of celebrities promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country".

Firstly because no-one actually believes that. More importantly, even they did, it's not about that.

This is about whether BBC employees, or contractors, have the right to express their opinions in their own time, on matters outside their area of responsibility. Whether you, I, Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage or Uncle Tom Cobley agree with their sentiments is irrelevant. One day someone will say things we do agree with and we cannot be selective. It's either OK, or it isn't.

Your last sentence is truly mind-blowing. Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

PalazioVecchio south pole 11 Mar 23 4.20pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett? Garnett was a caricature written by a leftie. The other 3 are no more toxic than Linekar. But more respectful of democracy than Marxist Gary. Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

PalazioVecchio

south pole 11 Mar 23 4.20pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett?

Garnett was a caricature written by a leftie.

The other 3 are no more toxic than Linekar. But more respectful of democracy than Marxist Gary.

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

georgenorman 11 Mar 23 4.21pm
The solution to all this is for the BBC to become a self-funding organisation not subject to any sort of 'charter'. It would then be free to tell its presenters what they can and can't do and the presenters could choose whether to work for them or not. Such a BBC should also rebrand and change its name.

georgenorman

11 Mar 23 4.21pm

The solution to all this is for the BBC to become a self-funding organisation not subject to any sort of 'charter'. It would then be free to tell its presenters what they can and can't do and the presenters could choose whether to work for them or not. Such a BBC should also rebrand and change its name.

inflikted 11 Mar 23 4.24pm
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio Garnett was a caricature written by a leftie. The other 3 are no more toxic than Linekar. But more respectful of democracy than Marxist Gary. Yaxley-Lennon is a bona fide fascist. Lineker is a moderate Liberal at best. Milkshakes Against Fascism

inflikted

11 Mar 23 4.24pm

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

Garnett was a caricature written by a leftie.

The other 3 are no more toxic than Linekar. But more respectful of democracy than Marxist Gary.

Yaxley-Lennon is a bona fide fascist. Lineker is a moderate Liberal at best.

Milkshakes Against Fascism

georgenorman 11 Mar 23 4.28pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle You have a history of posting inane comments, but this one takes you to a new low. This has nothing at all to do with any "group of celebrities promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country". Firstly because no-one actually believes that. More importantly, even they did, it's not about that. This is about whether BBC employees, or contractors, have the right to express their opinions in their own time, on matters outside their area of responsibility. Whether you, I, Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage or Uncle Tom Cobley agree with their sentiments is irrelevant. One day someone will say things we do agree with and we cannot be selective. It's either OK, or it isn't. Your last sentence is truly mind-blowing. Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett? What are your objections to unlimited immigration?

georgenorman

11 Mar 23 4.28pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You have a history of posting inane comments, but this one takes you to a new low.

This has nothing at all to do with any "group of celebrities promoting the idea that we can just have unlimited immigration into this country".

Firstly because no-one actually believes that. More importantly, even they did, it's not about that.

Your last sentence is truly mind-blowing. Who do you think ought to be allowed to influence the young and gullible? Farage? Yaxley-Lennon? Enoch Powell? Alf Garnett?

What are your objections to unlimited immigration?

Page 123 of 261 < 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 >

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

BBC (again)

Site Map