This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am no fan of Corbyn but Johnson's problem is that it isn't Corbyn who he is up against, however much he tries to frame it that way. It's Parliament as a whole, including a significant number of people who until recently were senior figures in his own party. As Corbyn is a very experienced Parliamentarian who understands the conventions and processes as well as anyone he also presents a formidable opponent at this time, whatever you think of his politics. He is also handling himself with more dignity and gravitas than Johnson, which won't be missed by the average voter. Corbyn could have instructed on how his lot voted.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I begin to find myself caring less, until I see the fancy dress pro EU oddballs outside Parliament (the town crier over interviews gets on my t1ts) and how many of the heavily pro EU public will happily sell this country out completely so it has completely lost its identity because of things like: Lack of pride Feeling their nation of England or Britain or ancestory isn’t interesting or diverse enough, too plain or embarrassing because of the people Emily Thornberry looks down at. You are what you are. Embrace it or deal with it. Move away if you don’t like it. There’s a solution. Guilt for things decades and centuries before them. No concern for anyone outside of their socio economic group. Apart from some principled people, I believe this to be the case. I’ve said this before but I’d be quite happy to encourage millions of young Mediterranean graduates into Britain like Blair did with cheap east Europeans that have cost people in lower socio economic groups or some industries. Then we’d see how much they love the EU when post graduates are in unskilled or low skilled jobs for many years to come. There are really only 2 things that concern me with leaving. 1. Medicine that needs to kept in controlled environments and temperatures. 2. JIT Just In Time car industry manufacturing. I can’t think of anything else that’s are that much of a concern and can’t be solved. Even those 2 can be with some organisation. Medication has been stockpiled and the car industry is being removed with or without brexit.if they can build cheaper elsewhere to make more profit they will.
|
|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
In trying to find an exit route that they can all agree upon and which is also acceptable to the rest of the EU they have indeed honoured their commitment. When the whole of the "leave" campaign was predicated upon the idea that a deal would not only be negotiated but would be a piece of cake to arrange you must expect Parliament to seek one. But there is a deal, agreed with the EU. It's Parliament has not backed it - three times.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Excellent points. You have surpassed yourself Willo, great post. As you rightly say as of yet Parliament haven’t come up with any alternative proposals. The onus is now on them.
Bring back Brolin |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
For the umpteenth time. We don't vote in delegates. We vote in representatives. They are not sent there to act on behalf of a small number of party members. They are sent there to use their wisdom to decide for themselves what is the best interests of everyone in their constituency and the country as a whole. So what your saying is the representatives gave us a referendum so we could leave. They then voted for artical 50 in order to leave. Then block brexit every way they can. Edited by dannyboy1978 (07 Sep 2019 2.44pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You don't leave the only option on the table as something which is unacceptable to your own Parliament! You need to show them that you have an alternative which they can accept. Without that your position is pointless. What you seem to forget is that Johnson is not a dictator able to commit the UK on his own. He is a PM who speaks only with the authority given to him by Parliament. As I have said several times before this dispute is much more than simply a wrangle over Brexit. It is a fundamental challenge to the way our system works and Parliament cannot allow itself to lose it. This is not rocket science, you do not take it off the table if you want to negotiate a good deal
|
|
|
I see BJ may defy the law and could end up inside. Apart from his time at Eton preparing him for this, 'trousers down, todgers out', I wonder if he could get a cell with Charles Bronson as his cell mate? Bronson and Johnson has a nice weddingly feel to it.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I see BJ may defy the law and could end up inside. Apart from his time at Eton preparing him for this, 'trousers down, todgers out', I wonder if he could get a cell with Charles Bronson as his cell mate? Bronson and Johnson has a nice weddingly feel to it. Charles Bronson gay? From the 'love that dare not speak its name'. To the love that 'can't frigging shut up'.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Charles Bronson gay? From the 'love that dare not speak its name'. To the love that 'can't frigging shut up'. I think the amount of time he has spent inside it's a case of any port in a storm
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I see BJ may defy the law and could end up inside. Apart from his time at Eton preparing him for this, 'trousers down, todgers out', I wonder if he could get a cell with Charles Bronson as his cell mate? Bronson and Johnson has a nice weddingly feel to it. That is seriously taking one for the team.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
That is seriously taking one for the team. We're all the same on the inside
Edited by Mapletree (07 Sep 2019 6.29pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
That is seriously taking one for the team. That was purely force of 'Abbott
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I see BJ may defy the law and could end up inside. Apart from his time at Eton preparing him for this, 'trousers down, todgers out', I wonder if he could get a cell with Charles Bronson as his cell mate? Bronson and Johnson has a nice weddingly feel to it. That law shouldn’t have been made in the first place.
Bring back Brolin |
|
|
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
With the utmost respect, Parliament is not expressing the will of the people when the majority voted to leave the EU.A total of 17.4 million voted to leave the EU but MPs refuse to carry out their instruction. On that note I must leave now for a coffee with my Conservative 'Leave' chums !!
I really regret having to say this yet again but voters don't give MPs "instructions". They vote in people to represent the constituency they happen to live in who then take decisions that they believe are in their collective best interests. That includes not just those who voted for them, but those who voted against them, those who did not vote and those who could not vote because they were too young. The latter's interests being particularly important. This idea that just because the Leave vote got a few more votes than Remain means that everyone else's interests must be disregarded needs to be erased really soon if we are ever going to make any progress.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
is 17.4 million a small number in your world?? Johnson wasn't chosen to be PM by 17.4 million was he? He was chosen by 160,000 party members. They are the only people to have endorsed his strategy. How many of that 17.4 million still want to Leave is unknown but it won't be all of them. Just as how many who voted to Remain might now want to Leave. They probably balance out though. But what is certain is whilst no-one knows exactly how many want to leave without a deal you can be quite sure it isn't all of them. In fact I suspect it isn't even half of them. Add those who voted to Remain and you can be very confident that there is not a UK wide majority in favour of leaving without a deal. Therefore Johnson is not only acting against the wishes of Parliament he is acting against the very probable wishes of the people as a whole. As that is what Parliament has concluded that's why they have acted to restrain him.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Well they don’t do that in normal circumstances or we may as well go to PR. For routine issues party lines are maintained to ensure smooth governance. When matters of conscience arise a free vote is often permitted. PR is a much more equitable and sensible method of representative government than first past the post. I recognise that the prospect of continuous coalitions doesn't appeal to everyone but I prefer it.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.