This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Trump is an outsider. I like that. He is not part of the established secret world government. Come on, we all know it exists. He tried to get in but failed not only the background check, but also the IQ test. And they even let in Berlusconi.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
He tried to get in but failed not only the background check, but also the IQ test. And they even let in Berlusconi. I'm not sure any elected politicians would get in while in office.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm not sure any elected politicians would get in while in office. The pentavorate? No probably not. So if current leaders are excluded and its ex leaders only, it is probably: Blair Is the pope in there? If there was such an organization, they would never get anything done. Brexit shows that 2 sides with intransigent positions can spend 3 years and still not find a compromise. 10 different despots/world leaders? No chance. They would still be voting on what logo to put on the business cards.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
After being impeached, President Clinton had a 73% approval rating. His final approval rating was 65%. Trump's lack of integrity, moral standards, and normal behavior (often known as one's character) mean he will never reach those levels.
Personally I don't regard these aspects as important, all that matters is how effective they are as president. Role models are for the young or weak minded...How good someone is at their job is what matters. I didn't support the attempts to unseat Clinton just as I don't Trump. A president should only be defeated at the ballot box.....It really has to be very serious for anything else and I couldn't care less about Clinton shagging interns or Trump's tax returns or bagging pros.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I like Trump. Un PC.....Who else is like that? Doesn't buy into feminism or minority victimhood. Sure, he's an arse and probably not very nice to be around. But he's a president, not my mate....Been good for their economy and trade deals.....and if he shags another brass at his age I'll give him a round of applause. Yep, I like Trump. Seconded.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Trump is an outsider. I like that. He is not part of the established secret world government. Come on, we all know it exists. Agreed, hence the portrait of Andrew Jackson hanging on his wall. Who are these people that can print money from thin-air and 'sell' it to us with interest added! How exactly does that work? (Feel free to explain) Time for a change.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Agreed, hence the portrait of Andrew Jackson hanging on his wall. Who are these people that can print money from thin-air and 'sell' it to us with interest added! How exactly does that work? (Feel free to explain) Time for a change. I read that as he has a picture of Andrew Johnson - confused me a bit.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Personally I don't regard these aspects as important, all that matters is how effective they are as president. Role models are for the young or weak minded...How good someone is at their job is what matters. I didn't support the attempts to unseat Clinton just as I don't Trump. A president should only be defeated at the ballot box.....It really has to be very serious for anything else and I couldn't care less about Clinton shagging interns or Trump's tax returns or bagging pros.
I really dont know how someone can objectively look at Trump, his twitter tirades and meltdowns, his MAGA rally performances, his verbal diarrhea, his outrageous lack of graciousness and class (going after McCain 7 months after he died, getting into a spat with the father of a recently deceased soldier, to name 2 of 20000 occasions).... And honestly tell me you think he displays better behavior, integrity and moral fiber than Bill Clinton. I watch a lot of Trump, and it is not close. We have to agree to disagree, as we are very, very far apart on this one. And for the record I believe this absolutely does affect his effectiveness as president.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I really dont know how someone can objectively look at Trump, his twitter tirades and meltdowns, his MAGA rally performances, his verbal diarrhea, his outrageous lack of graciousness and class (going after McCain 7 months after he died, getting into a spat with the father of a recently deceased soldier, to name 2 of 20000 occasions).... And honestly tell me you think he displays better behavior, integrity and moral fiber than Bill Clinton. I watch a lot of Trump, and it is not close. We have to agree to disagree, as we are very, very far apart on this one. And for the record I believe this absolutely does affect his effectiveness as president. To think Bill Clinton had higher moral standards than Donald Trump is being completely deluded. Clinton committed adultery and sexually assaulted multiple women while POTUS. The facts are there to see.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I really dont know how someone can objectively look at Trump, his twitter tirades and meltdowns, his MAGA rally performances, his verbal diarrhea, his outrageous lack of graciousness and class (going after McCain 7 months after he died, getting into a spat with the father of a recently deceased soldier, to name 2 of 20000 occasions).... And honestly tell me you think he displays better behavior, integrity and moral fiber than Bill Clinton. I watch a lot of Trump, and it is not close. We have to agree to disagree, as we are very, very far apart on this one. And for the record I believe this absolutely does affect his effectiveness as president.
I don't do the moral point scoring that you do. I'm not saying that it doesn't matter at all but for me.....It's of secondary value. I've heard Christopher Hitchens talk about the Clintons a lot and he disliked them, even writing a book about it.....but while I thought Clinton made really bad decisions in government on foreign policy and affirmative action programmes I regarded his presidency as relatively good economically. When it comes to the Trump effort so far.....I have to say, he's been doing better than I expected. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Apr 2019 12.47am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
The only way to insult half the nation, is to have a go at Hillary supporters, as she won 65.8 million votes, to Donald's 62.9, giving her 48.2, to his 46.1%. The electoral college is what counts and it's here to stay. Mate, you come across as a total sore loser. The election result was over 2 years ago. Why can't you get over it? Your candidate was so bad that a reality TV star/builder beat her. What an embarrassment! Unless the Dems get their act together, Trump will win again. I actually fear for your health! Edited by Penge Eagle (06 Apr 2019 1.07am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
To think Bill Clinton had higher moral standards than Donald Trump is being completely deluded. Clinton committed adultery and sexually assaulted multiple women while POTUS. The facts are there to see. I am starting to think you don’t really follow enough of the news and events in the USA, to be truly informed about what happens here in my home country. I do. I don’t think it is a fact that Clinton sexually assaulted multiple women while president, that is a wild accusation that you cannot back up. Ironic you spoke of character assassiniations as you really have a hard on for bubba don’t you. It is pretty boring having a back and forth with you. I enjoy debating the other guys who post here, but not really with you, so I probably won’t bother in the future. FYI on that one.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I don't do the moral point scoring that you do. I'm not saying that it doesn't matter at all but for me.....It's of secondary value. I've heard Christopher Hitchens talk about the Clintons a lot and he disliked them, even writing a book about it.....but while I thought Clinton made really bad decisions in government on foreign policy and affirmative action programmes I regarded his presidency as relatively good economically. When it comes to the Trump effort so far.....I have to say, he's been doing better than I expected. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Apr 2019 12.47am) I definitely understand the argument regarding personal conduct and behavior being secondary to presidential performance, and not being related, but I do disagree there. Honestly this is the biggest difference between trump fans and trump detractors. To many here his conduct is simply reprehensible and they are terribly embarrassed to be represented by such a man. That’s before we even get to policy. Far more though, of course, delight in his unconventional and bizarre ways. I have the feeling that history will not look kindly upon Trump, but that is just an opinion. One thing about him is he doesn’t know how to take a win, he finally gets a positive outcome on the Mueller report and blows it the next day by going after Obamacare. He is impulsive and just cannot help himself, which is a strength in some ways but a weakness also. Regarding his performance so far, I think some people thought the world would implode when he took office, which it hasn’t. He is dangerous though, and sets a bad example of leadership on the most divisive issues. The potus has to not just appease and appeal to his base, he needs to bring disparate groups together, but he just cannot do that.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I definitely understand the argument regarding personal conduct and behavior being secondary to presidential performance, and not being related, but I do disagree there. Honestly this is the biggest difference between trump fans and trump detractors. To many here his conduct is simply reprehensible and they are terribly embarrassed to be represented by such a man. That’s before we even get to policy. Far more though, of course, delight in his unconventional and bizarre ways. I have the feeling that history will not look kindly upon Trump, but that is just an opinion. One thing about him is he doesn’t know how to take a win, he finally gets a positive outcome on the Mueller report and blows it the next day by going after Obamacare. He is impulsive and just cannot help himself, which is a strength in some ways but a weakness also. Regarding his performance so far, I think some people thought the world would implode when he took office, which it hasn’t. He is dangerous though, and sets a bad example of leadership on the most divisive issues. The potus has to not just appease and appeal to his base, he needs to bring disparate groups together, but he just cannot do that. I suspect most people agree with you to some extent but the problem with Trump is that it’s his crassness and difference that appeal on some level to voters. Politicians are now so coached and practiced that they seem like interchangeable constructs. In The Thick of It they were referred to as brushed aluminium cyberpricks. Trump is different which gives him a maverick appeal and the more he’s attacked the more it grows. He’s a bit like a shock jock in that while some people actually like them more listen on a “can’t believe he said that” basis.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I am starting to think you don’t really follow enough of the news and events in the USA, to be truly informed about what happens here in my home country. I do. I don’t think it is a fact that Clinton sexually assaulted multiple women while president, that is a wild accusation that you cannot back up. Ironic you spoke of character assassiniations as you really have a hard on for bubba don’t you. It is pretty boring having a back and forth with you. I enjoy debating the other guys who post here, but not really with you, so I probably won’t bother in the future. FYI on that one. So you live in the US and I don't, therefore my opinion counts for nothing. What a ridiculous statement. Have you heard of the internet? So if that's the case, why do you think you can comment with any credibility on the Brexit thread? The posts you have made on this thread show your utter butt hurt for Hilary losing over two years ago. Trump is doing a good job and it hurts. You cannot hit me back with any counter-arguments over facts, so you are taking your ball home with you. Sad.
|
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I definitely understand the argument regarding personal conduct and behavior being secondary to presidential performance, and not being related, but I do disagree there. Honestly this is the biggest difference between trump fans and trump detractors. To many here his conduct is simply reprehensible and they are terribly embarrassed to be represented by such a man. Personally i've never looked at anyone that i don't know/never met as my ''representative''. That’s before we even get to policy. Far more though, of course, delight in his unconventional and bizarre ways. I have the feeling that history will not look kindly upon Trump, but that is just an opinion. I think it may do. One thing about him is he doesn’t know how to take a win, he finally gets a positive outcome on the Mueller report and blows it the next day by going after Obamacare. The medical 'plan' which has cost many dearly? He is impulsive and just cannot help himself, which is a strength in some ways but a weakness also. Regarding his performance so far, I think some people thought the world would implode when he took office, which it hasn’t. He is dangerous though, and sets a bad example of leadership on the most divisive issues. Ah, i remember that we would all be blown to smitherines when he spoke to N Korea. The potus has to not just appease and appeal to his base, he needs to bring disparate groups together, but he just cannot do that. Possibly due to the fact that for many years now the Liberalista have been wrongly ruling the roost? They've screwed up. Edited by .TUX. (06 Apr 2019 8.33pm)
Buy Litecoin. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Anyone interested in learning more about the great Trump tax fiasco, see here: It is apparently a simple matter of law, but given this is America it will likely be years in the system and end up in the Supreme court. I do so wonder what it is in Trump's tax returns that he so desperately wants to keep a secret. Smells a bit fishy, eh. If your finances/taxes are above board, why refuse to release them exactly? That doesnt do much to show his detractors that he is not a crook. As I thought. You are just another sore loser liberal who wants to stamp his feet and throw his toys around because Hillary lost. You think Trump is dirty. Can he be any lower than the level that your side is prepared to stoop to?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
He is dangerous though, and sets a bad example of leadership on the most divisive issues. The potus has to not just appease and appeal to his base, he needs to bring disparate groups together, but he just cannot do that.
Disparate groups are disparate precisely because there are differences between them. Bridges are only out of self interest and always temporary on large scales.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.