This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
You are entirely missing the point, because my point has nothing to do with the morality of financial markets, and you keep harping on about it; if random individuals or companies had taken this position, it wouldn’t be a story. Simply, people who influence outcomes should not be able to profit from them, as it creates a very clear conflict of interest. Again, I'm not 'missing the point' I'm contesting your ideology. The fact that you can't see that is you missing my argument. I've answered all your points here. I reject your contention. Whichever way 'Brexit' goes, people will make and lose money....that's half the reason different organizations funded different groups....your 'conflict of interest' is almost innocent in how the world works. Once again, if we don't leave, remainers will have made money.....Once that referendum result happened in 2016 these aspects were set. And once again, 'no deal' has never been Johnson's preferred option and the people who have made 'no deal' most likely are activist remainers and MPs...again who are fiscally backed......People who are no different to those you criticise so that Cummings....who has contempt for all politicians, decided that 'scorched earth' leading to 'no deal' was the only option that would honour the referendum result......He's probably right.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Firstly, I'm not a socialist. Secondly, wage slaves are the reality of globalisation, which in my view is an inevitability and feel free to fight against it but you'll lose. Ergo the need for low paid jobs to be filled by immigrants is nothing new, and will continue to be the standard until automation takes over. You make paying our 'own people' a better wage seem as simple as flicking a light switch. Firstly, who are our 'own people'. Lets for simplicity say people who were born here. Then just stop and think about the complexity of that. If we kicked out all non-brits tomorrow, and raised the pay to a level that would be acceptable to resident labour, how much debt would that accrue? How much money would need to be set aside to subsidise said wages to ensure our businesses remained competitive? and so on and so on. Don't make out these things are easy Re. the horses – I agree, but facts are facts. Not everyone in the EU has employment issues. Quite the opposite. So don't pass it off as though every country is affected. If the point had been worded differently the reply would not have been necessary – eg unemployment is high in the eastern bloc countries which is causing problems in more affluent western ones etc. etc. Worry not, Corbyn and Mcdonnell have promised that ALL people of working age WILL have jobs under a Labour government, and if there are no jobs, Corbyn will make some up so EVERYONE will have to work, even the lazy b******s who have NEVER worked......Corbyn and McDonnell however have yet to announce how this will be funded....'The Magic Money tree, perhaps??
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Worry not, Corbyn and Mcdonnell have promised that ALL people of working age WILL have jobs under a Labour government, and if there are no jobs, Corbyn will make some up so EVERYONE will have to work, even the lazy b******s who have NEVER worked......Corbyn and McDonnell however have yet to announce how this will be funded....'The Magic Money tree, perhaps?? Is that a direct quote? Sounds like hyperbolic nonsense to me.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
You make paying our 'own people' a better wage seem as simple as flicking a light switch. Firstly, who are our 'own people'. Lets for simplicity say people who were born here. Then just stop and think about the complexity of that. If we kicked out all non-brits tomorrow, and raised the pay to a level that would be acceptable to resident labour, how much debt would that accrue? How much money would need to be set aside to subsidise said wages to ensure our businesses remained competitive? and so on and so on. Don't make out these things are easy. Probably considerably less than would be saved on the social & welfare payments and NHS costs alone.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Is that a direct quote? Sounds like hyperbolic nonsense to me. direct from mcdonnell
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Osborne said the jobs would go the day after the vote, NOT when Brexit happened....HE LIED whether you like it or not HE LIED!! and yes I do believe the MPs are all in it for themselves, no other reason, except for one MP! Edited by the silurian (12 Sep 2019 3.46pm) What you say is a popular Leave myth. Osborne published a Treasury analysis and did not state his own opinion. No doubt the current Chancellor has a similar analysis but chooses not to publicise it. Forecasts can be wrong, because they are just forecasts. This forecast has been mitigated by the uncertainty that has surrounded the actual outcome with so many still uncertain of what will actually happen. The basic message remains as true today as it did in 2016, even if people like you try to deny it. There are bales of straws in the wind which indicate that. So Osborne didn't "lie". He gave oxygen to an official report which supported his political stance. Forecasts cannot either lie or be truthful. They can just be proven right, or wrong. Read this report at the time:-
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Worry not, Corbyn and Mcdonnell have promised that ALL people of working age WILL have jobs under a Labour government, and if there are no jobs, Corbyn will make some up so EVERYONE will have to work, even the lazy b******s who have NEVER worked......Corbyn and McDonnell however have yet to announce how this will be funded....'The Magic Money tree, perhaps?? Fits right in with the Governer of the Bank of England's repeated calls to improve productivity but inefficiently employing a load of lazy gits who blame all their problems on others. They will solve the problem of over entitlement on the youth. Also - related to other posts - can we get this factually correct. BJ is not advocating we leave the EU without a deal. He is saying that we need to keep it on the table to give ourselves the best platform to negotiate from. The Labour party have continuously shown they are politically naive and dont seem to grasp this.
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What you say is a popular Leave myth. Osborne published a Treasury analysis and did not state his own opinion. No doubt the current Chancellor has a similar analysis but chooses not to publicise it. Forecasts can be wrong, because they are just forecasts. This forecast has been mitigated by the uncertainty that has surrounded the actual outcome with so many still uncertain of what will actually happen. The basic message remains as true today as it did in 2016, even if people like you try to deny it. There are bales of straws in the wind which indicate that. So Osborne didn't "lie". He gave oxygen to an official report which supported his political stance. Forecasts cannot either lie or be truthful. They can just be proven right, or wrong. Read this report at the time:- He and David Cameron lost their jobs so Osborne wasnt lying. Corbyn campaign for remain and lost too, so no longer has a mandate and should have stepped down. Labour would be in a much better position had he done so..... it's like the Union are sticking up for an incompetent buffoon just because he's one of their members... typical unions.
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
direct from mcdonnell Link me the direct quote
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What you say is a popular Leave myth. Osborne published a Treasury analysis and did not state his own opinion. No doubt the current Chancellor has a similar analysis but chooses not to publicise it. Forecasts can be wrong, because they are just forecasts. This forecast has been mitigated by the uncertainty that has surrounded the actual outcome with so many still uncertain of what will actually happen. The basic message remains as true today as it did in 2016, even if people like you try to deny it. There are bales of straws in the wind which indicate that. So Osborne didn't "lie". He gave oxygen to an official report which supported his political stance. Forecasts cannot either lie or be truthful. They can just be proven right, or wrong. Read this report at the time:- Ok you believe he didnt lie, he forcasted badly......I and many others think he lied
|
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Link me the direct quote Nah cant be arsed, you go look it up like I did
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Ok you believe he didnt lie, he forcasted badly......I and many others think he lied You can’t campaign for one thing, lose, and still have a mandate to govern. They did the right thing. The only reason they didn’t state the would stand down if they lost the referendum before hand was because they didn’t want to turn it into a protest vote against the PM... although in loads of cases, that’s what happened anyway Unemployment is at a record low.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
Fits right in with the Governer of the Bank of England's repeated calls to improve productivity but inefficiently employing a load of lazy gits who blame all their problems on others. They will solve the problem of over entitlement on the youth. Also - related to other posts - can we get this factually correct. BJ is not advocating we leave the EU without a deal. He is saying that we need to keep it on the table to give ourselves the best platform to negotiate from. The Labour party have continuously shown they are politically naive and dont seem to grasp this. The naivety is all with those who believe that playing bluff with our future is a credible, let alone responsible, way for a government to behave. This isn't poker when you are risking your own money. You are risking our children's future. If you seriously think those who oppose this strategy, including Corbyn, don't understand it then you are really naive. Of course they do, but they can see just how foolish it is. It might look like a good tactic to the loud mouth down the pub but it really isn't because it can so easily go completely wrong. You just don't take that kind of risk in the hope it will put on enough pressure to get what you want. The EU will not blink in those circumstances because they have far too much to lose by doing so. They would swallow hard and accept the pain of a no deal.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Twaddle. A second referendum is invalid. Do you seriously think that those idiot Remainers would accept a second leave win any more than the first anyway? Are there really people that genuinely can't see that Remainers are determined to block Brexit under any circumstances? All the political posturing is just misdirection.
|
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
I don't see anything he said that was inaccurate myself. What point was rubbish?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I say this hand on heart that it’s a shame there has been no control of immigration from the EU or any member states when all EU migrants I’ve met have been good to meet. But that isn’t the full story. Yeah kind of Ironic that the EU believe that all fish caught in British waters belong to the EU, but anyone caught floundering in a rubber dinghy is the UKs problem. We should be shipping them straight back & dumping them onto French & Belgian beaches.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Yeah kind of Ironic that the EU believe that all fish caught in British waters belong to the EU, but anyone caught floundering in a rubber dinghy is the UKs problem. We should be shipping them straight back & dumping them onto French & Belgian beaches. I wonder what the policy is on mermaids?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by corkery
A group of Eastern European countries agreed today that amongst others, Albania should be allowed join the EU. A third of the country has already left illegally since the end of the cold war. Mapleleaf will be happy!! I believe he taught Albanian in the mid 70s
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The naivety is all with those who believe that playing bluff with our future is a credible, let alone responsible, way for a government to behave. This isn't poker when you are risking your own money. You are risking our children's future. If you seriously think those who oppose this strategy, including Corbyn, don't understand it then you are really naive. Of course they do, but they can see just how foolish it is. It might look like a good tactic to the loud mouth down the pub but it really isn't because it can so easily go completely wrong. You just don't take that kind of risk in the hope it will put on enough pressure to get what you want. The EU will not blink in those circumstances because they have far too much to lose by doing so. They would swallow hard and accept the pain of a no deal. I think you are caught up in the hysteria. An EU nation can still veto an extension, if for example, they dont want our MEPs taking their seats. The EU also dont want to put their citizens at risk or explain why they are taking a course that's damaging for it's own fragile economies simply to save face. That will not go down well with the electorate. What will happen in my view, is that we'll get very close to leaving on WTO terms, then strike a deal where both parties agree to keep the status quo for now, in line with the repeal act, then slowly diverge over time.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.