You make it sound like Labour Remainers have no will of their own.
They are blocking an election, blocking no deal, will block any deal and reject a second Referendum win for Leave.
In short, the problem is Labour Remainers and they must be taken out of the equation so we can realise Brexit.

Yes we voted to leave in 2016 and nothing has changed. The people have spoken and Parliament must deliver no matter what.

Nah mainly labour

Chaps get with it. While brexit dominates, 2 party politics is dead. Remember, Corbyn is a leaver as are most labour grassroots supporters in the midlands and north. Uncertainty makes the story... more interesting.

I don't think that's right.

There were three votes on May's deal.....Johnson, Mogg, Gove all voted for the last one......Labour and the opposition voted against on all three 'deal' brexits.

The country voted 51.9 percent to leave....Yet only 25 percent of MPs did.

That's why we are here now.....those simple facts.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2019 9.40pm)

You are wrong on that one sunshine. As ALWAYS you come out with a load of bull$hit just to satisfy your one sided view. It is quite obvious you have scoured the net for some text to copy and paste yourself just to prove your point.
READ the whole Lisbon treaty as others on here have and you will see it ties us down over the years as some of it has already and will continue to do so. Hence the reason a majority voted to get out of the EU.

Ok, below is a link to the treaty itself, which I won't pretend to have read in it's entirety as it's long and highly technical. I have scanned it and then read a summary, as I suspect most people have. I am not pretending to have done anything other than copy and paste references.

You claim to have read it all. So please identify in the text where it says the very specific things you claim it says:-

[Link]

I have both scanned it and read a detailed summary. I can find nothing that even comes close to supporting the claims that you made.
The treaty is full of legal language so a comprehensive summary of it's implications would generally be regarded as the intelligent way to appreciate what it means.

However as you claim to have read it all let's test that. I am not claiming to. I am challenging you to prove you have because from the tone of your replies I suspect that claim is bs.

If what you claim is there then point out where. You have read it! It cannot be difficult.

If you cannot do that, or try to find an excuse as to why you won't, I will assume, with some justification, that my suspicions are correct.

Why cant we have an ignore button on here??

Well I didn't mention the Lisbon Treaty.....As far as I'm concerned each treaty since Maastricht has seen unacceptable sovereign powers given away to foreign bodies without the mandate of the public.

The relevant point is that everything there certainly will happen if we don't leave.....What difference does it make which treaty includes what?

Like arguing over which log goes into the fire first.

Why is then other people have read the whole thing and come up with similar to what I have said. It is not hard to see that you come back with BS every time someone posts something that you do not agree with or do not understand. I think it boils down to the fact you are a very argumentative person and can only see YOUR side of any story. If you think I am going to keep answering your BS posts then think again as I have better things to do on match day than that. What I put originally was the easy way to put into words the treaty for people like you that just cannot digest big words or technical language or even bother to read something but instead dispute someone else's post.
Go and find some other remain voter and spend all day arguing a point you know NOTHING about.