This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's why we vote in representatives and not delegates. We need to find people we trust to make wise decisions on our behalf. Then leave the job to them. Good luck with finding any MP that you can trust amongst the criminals that inhabit the Commons these days...there isnt one MP I would trust anymore, all in it for themselves unless you can name some?? Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 3.45pm)
|
|
|
. Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 3.46pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
YES you ARE pathetic and I wonder what institution you escaped from and then went and hid down in Cornwall. The remark my friend was directed at your responses. Your "answer" on Mrs Miller's funding was to repeat the statement I had politely and carefully shown was false. If you can show any actual evidence that she has received anything at all from Soros, or even from the independent foundations he funds, since she left the Best for Britain group (where she did not receive anything directly but only as a group member) then feel free to provide it. Your hole must be so deep by now your toes must be burning! Time to stop?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's why we vote in representatives and not delegates. We need to find people we trust to make wise decisions on our behalf. Then leave the job to them. I wonder if you contravene the forum's rule 14 which includes "14.Do not use The Holmesdale Online's features in a manner that adversely affects the availability of its resources to other users (e.g. excessive shouting [use of all caps] or flooding [continuous posting of repetitive text or topics])." I wouldn't mind betting that you've spouted on about representatives and not delegates at least fifty times in this thread until most of us are heartily sick of hearing it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Time to stop? Please do
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Good luck with finding any MP that you can trust amongst the criminals that inhabit the Commons these days...there isnt one MP I would trust anymore, all in it for themselves unless you can name some?? Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 3.45pm) Your cynicism is unworthy. Most MPs do a thoroughly decent and public spirited job. I have a great deal of time for my own local MP, Sarah Newton who has helped me on occasions with problems. I also think Ben Bradshaw in Exeter is a sound guy but there are many more.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Your cynicism is unworthy. Most MPs do a thoroughly decent and public spirited job. I have a great deal of time for my own local MP, Sarah Newton who has helped me on occasions with problems. I also think Ben Bradshaw in Exeter is a sound guy but there are many more. From 1931 to 1984 there were 2 MPs suspended from Parliament. Since then there have been 25 (x6 were for Dennis Skinner).
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Your cynicism is unworthy. Most MPs do a thoroughly decent and public spirited job. I have a great deal of time for my own local MP, Sarah Newton who has helped me on occasions with problems. I also think Ben Bradshaw in Exeter is a sound guy but there are many more. 2 from 650...well done....what about all the expense fiddlers, the drunks, the liars (Peterboro MP) ???? Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 4.26pm) Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 4.28pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Please do then how will we know about delegates and representatives..?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Please do Happily. When no more transparent falsehoods are claimed and the insults stop there will be no more need.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
2 from 650...well done....what about all the expense fiddlers, the drunks, the liars (Peterboro MP) ???? Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 4.26pm) Edited by the silurian (19 Sep 2019 4.28pm) I just gave examples from my own area. There are many more. Of course in any bunch of people there are some we don't like, some who turn out to be corrupt and those who are little short of saints. The bottom line is that as who we get is who we choose the buck stops with us. If you don't like who you have just convince enough others of someone you prefer and all will be well. Until you do that just moaning isn't achieving anything at all.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
From 1931 to 1984 there were 2 MPs suspended from Parliament. Since then there have been 25 (x6 were for Dennis Skinner). I think it's neither. It's much more likely that there is now greater public scrutiny of, and less deference to, public figures who in the past were regarded as our betters. It's all society which has changed.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Still waiting for this ignore button.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I wonder if you contravene the forum's rule 14 which includes "14.Do not use The Holmesdale Online's features in a manner that adversely affects the availability of its resources to other users (e.g. excessive shouting [use of all caps] or flooding [continuous posting of repetitive text or topics])." I wouldn't mind betting that you've spouted on about representatives and not delegates at least fifty times in this thread until most of us are heartily sick of hearing it. Spouting on? Continuous posting of repetitive text? I always post in the context of the post I am responding to and rarely to never in an original comment. There have been far more than 50 times in this thread when the basic understanding of how our democratic system actually works is in error. Do you seriously want such mistakes to stand? This is not just an opinion by the way. It's a cold hard fact. If the point was taken and accepted then there would be no need for constant reminder. All I am doing is stating fact in the face of repeated denial of fact. So when the repeated denial of facts ceases so will the need to state the facts. Falsehoods ought never be allowed to stand unchallenged. That's how fake news spreads and conspiracy theories flourish. If things aren't true then they need to be shown not to be true and that applies just as much to me as to anyone else. So if our system isn't a Parliamentary democracy and we actually elect delegates and not representatives let someone explain why that is. No-one has yet tried to, but just go on posting the same mistaken claims. If you want any verification then listen to the lawyers presenting their case to the Supreme Court. They could hardly have been clearer on this subject and they repeated it many times to the Justices. Maybe you will believe them if you don't believe me. This matters, because unless and until folk understand that their approaches are based on a fundamental error of understanding there is no chance that this country can begin to heal.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This matters, because unless and until folk understand that their approaches are based on a fundamental error of understanding there is no chance that this country can begin to heal. It seems that our parliament housing representatives and not delegates is based on a speech that an MP made 250 years ago. The Brexit debacle has shown the population that this style of government is not what the populace want as we want MPs that represent what their voters want and not what the MP feels like doing. The vast majority of us vote traditionally and in accordance with the party's manifesto and we expect that the MP that we elect will also vote in line with his party's manifesto. If he feels that he can't do that he should resign his seat and occasion a by election, standing as an independent if he so wishes but giving his constituents the chance to either agree with their representative or voting him out
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I wonder if you contravene the forum's rule 14 which includes "14.Do not use The Holmesdale Online's features in a manner that adversely affects the availability of its resources to other users (e.g. excessive shouting [use of all caps] or flooding [continuous posting of repetitive text or topics])." I wouldn't mind betting that you've spouted on about representatives and not delegates at least fifty times in this thread until most of us are heartily sick of hearing it. Maybe we can have a vote/referendum on it!
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
A YouGov survey shows that there is a majority of the population that shows that they aren't happy with MPs doing their own thing and would prefer a more direct democracy Imagine having a job where your employer pays your wages and you say, 'I'll do what I like'. No, the people are ultimately sovereign and their wishes can't be divorced from their parliament like this clown pushes. A certain type of elite needs a certain type of reckoning.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
It seems that our parliament housing representatives and not delegates is based on a speech that an MP made 250 years ago. Based on, yes, just as it is based on the Magna Carta. This has though been confirmed many times since, notably by Winston Churchill and only this week in the submissions to our Supreme Court. It could be changed, but that's what we have right now. The Brexit debacle has shown the population that this style of government is not what the populace want as we want MPs that represent what their voters want and not what the MP feels like doing. Untrue. It has shown that some people feel that way. The vast majority of us vote traditionally and in accordance with the party's manifesto and we expect that the MP that we elect will also vote in line with his party's manifesto. If he feels that he can't do that he should resign his seat and occasion a by election, standing as an independent if he so wishes but giving his constituents the chance to either agree with their representative or voting him out You no more speak for the vast majority than I do! You speak for yourself. Unless and until we change the system Parliament speaks for us. Individual MPs are MPs first and owe their primary allegiance to their local electorate. All of them and not those in the party they happen to belong to. It's their decision as the local representative whether to resign if they find that they and their party no longer match. Parties can leave people just as quickly as people can leave parties. In fact parties change character much more frequently than people.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I think it's neither. It's much more likely that there is now greater public scrutiny of, and less deference to, public figures who in the past were regarded as our betters. It's all society which has changed. Are you saying they previously “got away” with the things which now get them suspended? If so that doesn’t speak well of the calibre of those entrusted to decide what’s best for the rest of us.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.