You're not wrong there, or in your previous posts.

Optimistic as ever

You have to be able to fire someone it does not mean you are vindictive but then Thatcher and Blair were always PM by virtue of the public in a general election I don't think an unelected PM such as Brown or May should delay seeking a mandate from the people.

A democratic minus for UK?

Factually correct, but recent national campaigns have defintely had large factors of "vote for us, so you don't get XXX running the country".

Tory Dave's last win was arguably on the back of a "vote labour, get Nicola Sturgeon calling the shots in England" campaign.

May won't go to the country given the massive two fingers stuck up by the electorate to the status quo.

Edited by Mr_Gristle (01 Sep 2016 6.21pm)

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Would be in her interests to do so, as it would result in a Tory landslide. She shouldn't do it though, we've two elections in the space of a year and it's time they started doing their job rather than talking to the electorate.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

And he is hosting a drinks reception for journalists tonight from 6 until 9

The bloke is like a 6th form prefect

So says the Evening Standard.

Oh how Pravda wished they could have unquestioning sheople like you to pass on the MSM message.

The Evening Standard said it so it is true. The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true The Evening Standard said it so it is true.

Be honest you only say that because the MSM told you to think it because otherwise you have no original opinion.

Remember how when you where a kid and you got in trouble at school and the teacher said "well if Jimmy Jones told you to jump out the window would you?"

and even before she had finished you were trying to undo the window.

What if the media are owned by very rich people who don't want things to change and its in their interest to convince you to go against you interest and you only get your opinions from the paper? What then?

You can criticize Corbyn for many many things, but a nasty piece of work? The MSM are seriously messing with your head.

Meanwhile the Tory leader when asked if she would press the button and destroy millions of people and she doesn't even hesitate for a Milli-second before saying "yes" and you say what a lovely lady. What a lovely lovely lady.

Your mind is just a blackboard upon which the MSM write the things you will hate at breakfast.

Bill....... you have been watching too many Scifi films and TV programmes.

It is 2016 and this is planet Earth.

It is not the year 3000 and a Galaxy, far, far away.

People can still formulate their own opinions and are not subconsciously controlled by the media.

FFS........ give it a rest, you're worse than Bert The Head!

Edited by Hoof Hearted (03 Sep 2016 10.54am)

You are correct. I am incapable of having an original thought.

Alternatively, maybe I just don't buy into the fandom that is bordering on a cult that has Corbyn has around him.

Clearly this was not what Jeremy was suggesting, he instead highlighted a concern among many women's groups and the head of the CBI that a male-led after-work networking culture in some workplaces can be detrimental to the career progression of female co-workers who can feel excluded, especially those women with caring responsibilities

From the article.