Would

If such demographics are being under-represented, then no, not at all. If someone is calling for their race/creed/color/gender/orientation to be preferred over another just because...then yes.

The German pilots are peripheral characters in "Battle of Britain", and I'm not living in the real world? You could write them out of the script, I suppose, but then it would be a very boring movie.

You did manage to avoid the point of the German pilot analogy, that there's a whole continent of white foreigners with whom you are very unlikely to identify and with whom you would have a very hard time communicating unless they happen to speak English. But white is white, right?

And I agree that casting minority actors in minor roles is how the studios try to slide on the demographics of their movies.

Edited by Ray in Houston (18 Jul 2017 9.10pm)

Amused me

You introduced a ridiculous comparison because it was a real event and the film is a depiction of that history.
In that case, I am more likely to identify with the British for obvious reasons.

574 'foreign' pilots including 141 Polish and 127 New Zealanders.
2,353 British.

Would there be a similar outcry if the producers of Babestation decided to switch to a male only cast?

The least they could do seeing as we were a major player in rescuing their countries from the Germans and Japanese.

So 'racism' is determined by your representation on TV?

I see. So it's not OK for Black people to want to see Black actors in films over white actors if the ratio of Black actors is in line with the population?

You will never stop people identifying with others similar to themselves.
I have no more to say on this, particularly to people who use the word 'racist to stifle the debate.