Jeremy Corbyn

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Jeremy Corbyn

Page 130 of 464 < 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 >

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.09am
I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.11am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Not going to answer the question in my previous post? I answered your question about the 'living wage'. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.11am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Not going to answer the question in my previous post?

I answered your question about the 'living wage'.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.13am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.18am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.18am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that.

That said, I agree with the idea.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.19am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.19am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that.

That said, I agree with the idea.

So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK?

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.24am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.24am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that.

That said, I agree with the idea.

So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK?

Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering?

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.37am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering? If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain? Let's leave this here Gusset. You have returned to type and are refusing to answer questions, or answering questions with questions. I am sure this will be a relief for you as you clearly don't want to answer awkward questions or don't have anything to answer them with. Twice I asked you about pensions, twice you twisted. Edited by matt_himself (16 Jan 2016 10.40am) "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.37am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that.

That said, I agree with the idea.

So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK?

Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering?

If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain?

Let's leave this here Gusset. You have returned to type and are refusing to answer questions, or answering questions with questions. I am sure this will be a relief for you as you clearly don't want to answer awkward questions or don't have anything to answer them with. Twice I asked you about pensions, twice you twisted.

Edited by matt_himself (16 Jan 2016 10.40am)

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 16 Jan 16 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 16 Jan 16 10.43am

Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments.

Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset.

But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately.

From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income.

Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.46am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.37am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering? If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain? Let's leave this here Gusset. You have returned to type and are refusing to answer questions, or answering questions with questions. I am sure this will be a relief for you as you clearly don't want to answer awkward questions or don't have anything to answer them with. Twice I asked you about pensions, twice you twisted. Edited by matt_himself (16 Jan 2016 10.40am) Can you explain how it would 'potentially' (your words so not definite then) hamper pensions, then I will respond. From where I see it, you seem to be ok with investment at the cost of employee rights and salary. Is this correct?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.46am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.37am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that.

That said, I agree with the idea.

So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK?

Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering?

If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain?

Edited by matt_himself (16 Jan 2016 10.40am)

Can you explain how it would 'potentially' (your words so not definite then) hamper pensions, then I will respond.

From where I see it, you seem to be ok with investment at the cost of employee rights and salary. Is this correct?

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population. You imply that a large slice of the population rely on dividends for income. Really. I'd imagine that more rely on a decent wage. Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.48am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am

Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments.

Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset.

But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately.

From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income.

Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.

You imply that a large slice of the population rely on dividends for income. Really. I'd imagine that more rely on a decent wage.

Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.49am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population. The irony is Hoof, that the public sector pension funds also rely on dividends from their investments to make pension payments. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.49am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am

Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments.

Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset.

But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately.

From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income.

Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.

The irony is Hoof, that the public sector pension funds also rely on dividends from their investments to make pension payments.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.50am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.46am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.37am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house. [Link] for example. Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases? Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering? If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain? Let's leave this here Gusset. You have returned to type and are refusing to answer questions, or answering questions with questions. I am sure this will be a relief for you as you clearly don't want to answer awkward questions or don't have anything to answer them with. Twice I asked you about pensions, twice you twisted. Edited by matt_himself (16 Jan 2016 10.40am) Can you explain how it would 'potentially' (your words so not definite then) hamper pensions, then I will respond. From where I see it, you seem to be ok with investment at the cost of employee rights and salary. Is this correct? no more Gusset. You are deliberately being obtuse. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 16 Jan 16 10.50am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.46am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.37am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am

Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am

Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am

I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
[Link] for example.

Are you agreeing then that Corbyn intends to bypass the House if elected and introduce his policies as he pleases?

Interesting.

It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that.

That said, I agree with the idea.

So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK?

Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering?

If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain?

Edited by matt_himself (16 Jan 2016 10.40am)

Can you explain how it would 'potentially' (your words so not definite then) hamper pensions, then I will respond.

From where I see it, you seem to be ok with investment at the cost of employee rights and salary. Is this correct?

no more Gusset. You are deliberately being obtuse.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 130 of 464 < 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Jeremy Corbyn

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors