This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's the Rachel Johnson who said on Radio 4 this week (I heard the interview) that she loved her brother dearly, that he behaves differently at home with the family and that he is thoroughly enjoying being PM. She also said that his reasons for adopting the strategy he is might be that his backers would make a pile of money from a no deal exit. She has subsequently also heavily criticised his choice of language. As she is closer to him than anyone here I think it is likely she is better informed than us. I very much doubt that it's a matter of being informed as she claims that Boris has a vested interest without admitting that she may have a vested interest herself
|
|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
[Tweet Link]Well he would say that, wouldn't he?
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
|
What do the Boris speculators think sterling will do then?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh I am perfectly comfortable to allow truth to be the arbiter. Mind you finding an untainted neutral jury pool from the population in this neck of the woods is going to prove very challenging. You chose to live there so take it with a pinch of salt and take the good times with the bad ones.....IF you can!!!
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
What do the Boris speculators think sterling will do then? Probably have another JD whilst composing his next responses to Maple, Wissie et al.....
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| W12 28 Sep 19 8.15pm | |
|---|---|
|
I think we might be going full on Oliver Cromwell. It’s sad, but if it secures the future then so be it. I hate the lefties for taking us here.
|
|
|
Originally posted by W12
I think we might be going full on Oliver Cromwell. It’s sad, but if it secures the future then so be it. I hate the lefties for taking us here. Anything worth shorting?
|
|
|
Originally posted by W12
I think we might be going full on Oliver Cromwell. It’s sad, but if it secures the future then so be it. I hate the lefties for taking us here. And there it is AGAIN. Lefties! Remain is largely the centre ground. Leave occupies the extremes of both right and left. On Brexit you will be amazed how much you have in common with the other end of the spectrum.
|
|
|
Originally posted by susmik
You chose to live there so take it with a pinch of salt and take the good times with the bad ones.....IF you can!!! Trust you to get the wrong end of the stick!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by becky
Probably have another JD whilst composing his next responses to Maple, Wissie et al.....
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
And there it is AGAIN. Lefties! Remain is largely the centre ground. Leave occupies the extremes of both right and left. On Brexit you will be amazed how much you have in common with the other end of the spectrum. I think the opinion polls are evidence against your contention on extremes. However, the election....when it comes will sort out where we are for real.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Rachid Rachid Rachid
Great result today. Thought Kouyate covered every blade and decent home form continues. Roy doing a good job. Nice finish from Townsend to ease any anxiety at the death. This is about BRexit not PLexit.
|
|
|
For those who fully supported the decision of the Supreme Court, be careful what you wish for.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
For those who fully supported the decision of the Supreme Court, be careful what you wish for. There's little doubt that their decision will have consequences. I doubt they will be positive. They have inserted the judiciary into politics, which is without precedent. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Sep 2019 8.53am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
If Corbyn can form a government then Brexit will be denied but to do that he will need the Lib Dems and the rebel Tories.
Surely the renegade Tories would never vote for anything that would enable Corbyn to become Prime Minister as the thought of that is too horrific to even contemplate
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
For those who fully supported the decision of the Supreme Court, be careful what you wish for. Those who fail to fully support the decision of OUR Supreme Court, need to be careful that they follow the law, which applies to all. Even Prime Ministers. This judgement hasn't "inserted" the Judiciary into politics. The law applies to political actions just as much it does to every other aspect of life. All that has happened is for an attempt to sideline Parliament for a while to be declared unlawful. The law was always there. It was the attempt that was new so had never before needed to be brought before a Court and for the Court to make their judgement. For the government, and Johnson, to say they "disagree" with it, and suggest that other law officers do too, is disingenuous. The High Court did not disagree. They referred it to the Supreme Court to decide IF it was "justiciable" as it needed the highest court to decide such an important point. They did decide and everything flowed from that. That it will have consequences is obvious. Whether all those consequences are desirable is something for a future Parliament to consider and legislate on, if they believe that to be necessary. So it isn't the "opposition" dragging the law into politics at all. It is the government who is doing that. The government broke the law and is now trying to politicise the judiciary by seeking to criticise their judgement. This is another example of a disgraceful strategy being fostered in the backrooms by "advisors" determined to interfere in the smooth progress of Parliamentary democracy. This truly is where we need to be careful about what is wished for! I hope that the Tory party wake up soon and see what is being done to them before it is too late. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (29 Sep 2019 12.11pm)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.