This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
BBC (again)
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
 Teddy Eagle  14 Mar 23 10.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Yes they should, or withdraw from offering to make cakes for others. This is one of the primary reasons the law needs to change. To make sure all communities understand that they must keep their private beliefs private. It's really important going forward. Do you honestly think that's going to happen? Not what you think should, will happen.
|
|
Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 14 Mar 23 10.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
If some pompous idiot from, say Cornwall, rolled up at the bakery and asked for "Boycott Asher's Bakery" on a cake - that would be ok? Of course.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Mar 23 10.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Do you honestly think that's going to happen? Not what you think should, will happen. Not during this Parliament for sure and probably not for a while. We have rather too many more pressing matters to deal with first. Nor, I suspect, in my lifetime, but eventually yes I do.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Teddy Eagle 14 Mar 23 11.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not during this Parliament for sure and probably not for a while. We have rather too many more pressing matters to deal with first. Nor, I suspect, in my lifetime, but eventually yes I do. And I suspect the more time goes by the less likely this is to happen.
|
|
| Teddy Eagle 14 Mar 23 11.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Ok, someone else wanting the same message. No answer?
|
|
 georgenorman 15 Mar 23 6.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Why don't you stop being perverse and try to read what has already been explained several times. No-one ever gets thrown in prison for simply standing silently in the street. A very few get arrested, when they are already well known for intimidating others and deciding to flout a restriction order. The silent standing is a non issue. She could have been juggling, or standing on her head. Just being there was enough. Nor does anyone's home deserve torching because I don't approve of them. It's not them that I want to change. It's the law which allows them, and others, to introduce private preferences into business responsibilities. Arrest people for standing silently in public streets. Arrest people for the suspected content of their silent prayers. Arrest people who have had previous contact with the police if they are perceived as acting wrongly. Prosecute businesses for refusing commissions. Persecute people for refusing vaccinations. Allow people to break their contracts of employment for (approved) political reasons. Continue to tax people to fund (approved) political propaganda. Bring in proportional representation to allow more ‘progressive’ parties power. Have MPs voting in secret, as it is no business of the public as to how they vote. Re-join the EU, of course, and offer to double our contribution as a gesture of good will and contrition. Have completely open borders in order to stop boat people – they can just pop on a ferry. Make John Bercow the Speaker for life. Edited by georgenorman (15 Mar 2023 11.01am)
|
|
| georgenorman 15 Mar 23 7.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
They should report it to the Police as he would obviously have escaped from prison. They didn't recognise him as he was in a dress, makeup and wig that he had acquired from Sam Smith and had just returned from the local library where he had been giving a talk to children on how they should embrace their sexuality. Now, should Ashers be obliged to put "reduce the age of consent to 10 on the cake" that he wants them to make? Edited by georgenorman (15 Mar 2023 8.14am)
|
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 23 10.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
They didn't recognise him as he was in a dress, makeup and wig that he had acquired from Sam Smith and had just returned from the local library where he had been giving a talk to children on how they should embrace their sexuality. Now, should Ashers be obliged to put "reduce the age of consent to 10 on the cake" that he wants them to make? Edited by georgenorman (15 Mar 2023 8.14am) Yes.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| georgenorman 15 Mar 23 10.23am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Yes. If that's your stance, you are even more irresponsible and dangerous than I thought. Should the HOL admins be obliged to allow the posting of any message on here as long as it is within the law?
|
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 15 Mar 23 11.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This ought to be a parody, but I fear it isn't. At least it made me laugh and I suspect it made a few others chuckle too. The only thing that's true there is that it really isn't a debate. Your ideas are complete nonsense That's rich coming from you. It must be different in Cornwall.
|
|
| Midlands Eagle 15 Mar 23 11.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
With the BBC board's make-up as it is, with a tory donor chairman under investigation, a prospective tory MP and right leaning members, it makes it easy for the conservative party to bully and cajole them, credit to Lineker & co for making principled and successful stand. Credit to the BBC for making an unpopular stand against the narcissism of it's highest paid high profile employee
|
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 15 Mar 23 11.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
8 I know you aren't talking to me but... The newspapers are predominantly left wing..? The Guardian. Left wing
The Times, neutral. Yes. Predominantly leftist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2023 11.15am)
|
|
| georgenorman 15 Mar 23 11.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The Sun - left wing.
I didn't know the Morning Star still operated - its run from Ruskin House Croydon. Doesn't look much like the Communist one but genuinely socialist. What's the difference?
|
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 15 Mar 23 11.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The Guardian. Left wing
The Times, neutral. Yes. Predominantly leftist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2023 11.15am) Financial Times - Remain
One more point |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 15 Mar 23 12.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The Morning Star GIFT ANNUAL £199.99 One year full subscription. I rushed straight back here as I know demand will be high.
Typical commies always ready to embrace capitalism when it suits them
One more point |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 15 Mar 23 1.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The Guardian. Left wing
The Times, neutral. Yes. Predominantly leftist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2023 11.15am) The Sun supports the next election winner.
COYP |
|
| Mstrobez 15 Mar 23 1.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The Guardian. Left wing
The Times, neutral. Yes. Predominantly leftist. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (15 Mar 2023 11.15am) Well this is hardcore bollocks isn’t it. How can you separate the Guardian, Observer, Mirror & Sunday Mirror as separate entities just to make your first paragraph bigger, but then not list the Sunday Times, Mail on Sunday & Sunday Express in the second? Disingenuous beyond belief. And to suggest the Times isn’t on the right and insinuate the Sun is left wing is absolutely ridiculous. The Metro is also owned by the Daily Mail. Honestly absurd. Edited by Mstrobez (15 Mar 2023 1.41pm)
We're the Arthur over ere! |
|
| georgenorman 15 Mar 23 1.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Well this is hardcore bollocks isn’t it. How can you separate the Guardian, Observer, Mirror & Sunday Mirror as separate entities just to make your first paragraph bigger, but then not list the Sunday Times, Mail on Sunday & Sunday Express in the second? Disingenuous beyond belief. And to suggest the Times isn’t on the right and insinuate the Sun is left wing is absolutely ridiculous. The Metro is also owned by the Daily Mail. Honestly absurd. Edited by Mstrobez (15 Mar 2023 1.41pm) Who cares, the number of people reading newspapers is declining at an ever accelerating rate.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.