You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 11 2024 10.20pm

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 138 of 311 < 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 >

Topic Locked

View Elpis's Profile Elpis Flag In a pub 02 Dec 14 3.22pm Send a Private Message to Elpis Add Elpis as a friend

Hi fellow Palace fans . Some of the views on UKIP here seem a bit uninformed or maybe misinformed .(Not all ,some are on the ball)

Though many of UKIPs policies are a work in progress they have published an outline manifesto for next years elections , the media and other parties will bang on about what they think they know or what they think you might believe in false propaganda ie that UKIP want to nationalise the Health Service , that UKIP are anti immigration ,that leaving the EU will cost 3million jobs ect . All lies of course , the truth is out there .

[Link]


There are many reasons not to support UKIP , for me getting our country back trumps all of them .

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Seth's Profile Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 02 Dec 14 3.51pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 2.19pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 1.45pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 12.46pm

It hasn't positioned itself. If you aren't one of the 3 main political parties (in England) you are by definition not established.


Of course it has. They're forever banging on about how anti-establishment they are but are run and bankrolled by the very establishment they profess to be fighting against. It's a blatant charade.


You can't position yourself as something when it is defined by fact. They're either established or they're not.

That they've only just got their first MPs I think we know which one it is.


"Anti-establishment" doesn't just mean "not one of the 3 main Westminster parties". That's a very narrow definition which I don't think applies to how ukip position themselves, eg as not part of the "Westminster Ruling Elite".

Even if you use that definition, most of ukip's big hitters come from established parties (ex-Tories mainly), are bankrolled by big business and generally come from the public school, city trading, millionaire wing of the ruling classes. Rather than being "anti-establishment", they are at the core of established power and privilege in this country.

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Seth's Profile Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 02 Dec 14 3.54pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Elpis at 02 Dec 2014 3.22pm

Hi fellow Palace fans . Some of the views on UKIP here seem a bit uninformed or maybe misinformed .(Not all ,some are on the ball)

Though many of UKIPs policies are a work in progress they have published an outline manifesto for next years elections , the media and other parties will bang on about what they think they know or what they think you might believe in false propaganda ie that UKIP want to nationalise the Health Service , that UKIP are anti immigration ,that leaving the EU will cost 3million jobs ect . All lies of course , the truth is out there .

[Link]


There are many reasons not to support UKIP , for me getting our country back trumps all of them .


Earlier this year Farage disowned ukip's 2010 manifesto, describing it as "drivel" and "nonsense". How can we be sure this latest wish-list will not go the same way in a few years time?

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Seth's Profile Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 02 Dec 14 4.12pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 02 Dec 2014 11.27am

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 1.09am

I'm happy for the SNP (and Plaid, and the Greens) to take votes from Labour. I don't support what is now called "The Westminster Elite" (previously known as "The Ruling Class" ).

I'm amazed that a party made up of former Tories, bankrolled by former Tories and further to the right than the Tories has managed to position itself as anti-establishment. But Farage is a canny politician and has most of the media fawning all over him and licking his a*se so it shouldn't be that surprising I suppose.

The real shame is that so many people have allowed themselves to be taken in by Farage's "man of the people" schtick when it's so transparently just a vehicle for his political ambitions. He's a politician like all the rest. One whiff of power and his principles will go the way of Clegg's tuition fee "promise".


I don't think they do Seth.

As far as I can see the BBC and the Sun are not backing UKIP and are always on his case with stories about loony candidates, confusing statements and MEP's not turning up to Brussels etc.

Farage is taking a lot of sh1t, but gives credible honest responses. That is why he and UKIP are popular and the Westminster elite are not.

I'm no more taken in by Farage than I am by Cameron, but right now he is forcing the elite to rethink immigration policy and I applaud him for that. Without Farage, immigration would not be in the forefront of debate.

What happens next May and thereafter is unpredictable but right now he is doing a good job and gets my support.

The media might not be overtly backing ukip but they get an incredible amount of coverage for what is essentially a protest party. Remember the old adage about no publicity being bad publicity? I'm sure Farage does too.

The Greens have doubled their membership to almost 30,000 since January (ukip has 40,000 members) but receive a tiny fraction of the coverage ukip gets in the mainstream media. Of course ukip are on the rise and that will be reflected in the media, but it seems to me their coverage is disproportionate to their support, especially when compared to the other smaller parties.

Of course if immigration is what one is concerned about then ukip's pushing it into the mainstream is a good thing. But my view is that a lot of ukip support comes from people disaffected by the established parties who see ukip as a useful vehicle for giving Cameron, Clegg and Miliband a bit of a kicking. Whether they support all of ukip's policies is another matter altogether.

Either way though, it will be very interesting to see what happens in May. I'm quite looking forward to it personally!


Edited by Seth (02 Dec 2014 4.13pm)

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Pawson Palace's Profile Pawson Palace Flag Croydon 02 Dec 14 4.28pm Send a Private Message to Pawson Palace Add Pawson Palace as a friend

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.54pm

Quote Elpis at 02 Dec 2014 3.22pm

Hi fellow Palace fans . Some of the views on UKIP here seem a bit uninformed or maybe misinformed .(Not all ,some are on the ball)

Though many of UKIPs policies are a work in progress they have published an outline manifesto for next years elections , the media and other parties will bang on about what they think they know or what they think you might believe in false propaganda ie that UKIP want to nationalise the Health Service , that UKIP are anti immigration ,that leaving the EU will cost 3million jobs ect . All lies of course , the truth is out there .

[Link]


There are many reasons not to support UKIP , for me getting our country back trumps all of them .


Earlier this year Farage disowned ukip's 2010 manifesto, describing it as "drivel" and "nonsense". How can we be sure this latest wish-list will not go the same way in a few years time?

I'm interested to see how they can afford to abolish IHT, up the personal allowance and add in a 35p rate band.

I know that leaving EU will save X amount but surely there is a black hole in there somewhere.

 


Pride of South London
Upper Holmesdale Block P

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Seth's Profile Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 02 Dec 14 4.39pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Pawson Palace at 02 Dec 2014 4.28pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.54pm

Quote Elpis at 02 Dec 2014 3.22pm

Hi fellow Palace fans . Some of the views on UKIP here seem a bit uninformed or maybe misinformed .(Not all ,some are on the ball)

Though many of UKIPs policies are a work in progress they have published an outline manifesto for next years elections , the media and other parties will bang on about what they think they know or what they think you might believe in false propaganda ie that UKIP want to nationalise the Health Service , that UKIP are anti immigration ,that leaving the EU will cost 3million jobs ect . All lies of course , the truth is out there .

[Link]


There are many reasons not to support UKIP , for me getting our country back trumps all of them .


Earlier this year Farage disowned ukip's 2010 manifesto, describing it as "drivel" and "nonsense". How can we be sure this latest wish-list will not go the same way in a few years time?

I'm interested to see how they can afford to abolish IHT, up the personal allowance and add in a 35p rate band.

I know that leaving EU will save X amount but surely there is a black hole in there somewhere.

I haven't been through their policies with a fine-tooth comb, but they will hopefully get the same detailed scrutiny as the other parties' manifestos will in the run-up to May's election. If the media do their jobs properly we'll see if ukip's policy platform stands up to examination.

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Pawson Palace's Profile Pawson Palace Flag Croydon 02 Dec 14 4.46pm Send a Private Message to Pawson Palace Add Pawson Palace as a friend

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 4.39pm

Quote Pawson Palace at 02 Dec 2014 4.28pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.54pm

Quote Elpis at 02 Dec 2014 3.22pm

Hi fellow Palace fans . Some of the views on UKIP here seem a bit uninformed or maybe misinformed .(Not all ,some are on the ball)

Though many of UKIPs policies are a work in progress they have published an outline manifesto for next years elections , the media and other parties will bang on about what they think they know or what they think you might believe in false propaganda ie that UKIP want to nationalise the Health Service , that UKIP are anti immigration ,that leaving the EU will cost 3million jobs ect . All lies of course , the truth is out there .

[Link]


There are many reasons not to support UKIP , for me getting our country back trumps all of them .


Earlier this year Farage disowned ukip's 2010 manifesto, describing it as "drivel" and "nonsense". How can we be sure this latest wish-list will not go the same way in a few years time?

I'm interested to see how they can afford to abolish IHT, up the personal allowance and add in a 35p rate band.

I know that leaving EU will save X amount but surely there is a black hole in there somewhere.

I haven't been through their policies with a fine-tooth comb, but they will hopefully get the same detailed scrutiny as the other parties' manifestos will in the run-up to May's election. If the media do their jobs properly we'll see if ukip's policy platform stands up to examination.

That was just from the link the chap on top of the page posted.

Seemed a lot of big pledges...I know the conservatives wanted to increase the 40% tax band up to £50,000 which wont be cheap either.

 


Pride of South London
Upper Holmesdale Block P

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 02 Dec 14 5.13pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.51pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 2.19pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 1.45pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 12.46pm

It hasn't positioned itself. If you aren't one of the 3 main political parties (in England) you are by definition not established.


Of course it has. They're forever banging on about how anti-establishment they are but are run and bankrolled by the very establishment they profess to be fighting against. It's a blatant charade.


You can't position yourself as something when it is defined by fact. They're either established or they're not.

That they've only just got their first MPs I think we know which one it is.


"Anti-establishment" doesn't just mean "not one of the 3 main Westminster parties". That's a very narrow definition which I don't think applies to how ukip position themselves, eg as not part of the "Westminster Ruling Elite".

Even if you use that definition, most of ukip's big hitters come from established parties (ex-Tories mainly), are bankrolled by big business and generally come from the public school, city trading, millionaire wing of the ruling classes. Rather than being "anti-establishment", they are at the core of established power and privilege in this country.


It means against the establishment. The establishment want us to stay in the EU, all 3 parties.

UKIP only have one big hitter and I couldn't care less where he came from or who bankrolls them, nor the rest. If they were at the core of power, they'd be in power.

But please knock yourself out and find these powerful and privilged who are the core of this "establishment". I'm sure we could find many more for the "established" 3 parties.

This quarter:
[Link]

Last year:
[Link]

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Elpis's Profile Elpis Flag In a pub 02 Dec 14 5.17pm Send a Private Message to Elpis Add Elpis as a friend

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.54pm

Quote Elpis at 02 Dec 2014 3.22pm

Hi fellow Palace fans . Some of the views on UKIP here seem a bit uninformed or maybe misinformed .(Not all ,some are on the ball)

Though many of UKIPs policies are a work in progress they have published an outline manifesto for next years elections , the media and other parties will bang on about what they think they know or what they think you might believe in false propaganda ie that UKIP want to nationalise the Health Service , that UKIP are anti immigration ,that leaving the EU will cost 3million jobs ect . All lies of course , the truth is out there .

[Link]


There are many reasons not to support UKIP , for me getting our country back trumps all of them .


Earlier this year Farage disowned ukip's 2010 manifesto, describing it as "drivel" and "nonsense". How can we be sure this latest wish-list will not go the same way in a few years time?

I think they have moved on and grown in recent years . The 2010 manifesto was no more than a wish list setting out the direction they were taking . There was no chance of electoral success so little scrutiny . The latest policy statement is there to be picked over by the other parties ,which they will do as the elections approach .
With the expectations of winning seats they had to get this one right , I expect them to be able to defend the finances .


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 02 Dec 14 5.23pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 5.13pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.51pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 2.19pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 1.45pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 12.46pm

It hasn't positioned itself. If you aren't one of the 3 main political parties (in England) you are by definition not established.


Of course it has. They're forever banging on about how anti-establishment they are but are run and bankrolled by the very establishment they profess to be fighting against. It's a blatant charade.


You can't position yourself as something when it is defined by fact. They're either established or they're not.

That they've only just got their first MPs I think we know which one it is.


"Anti-establishment" doesn't just mean "not one of the 3 main Westminster parties". That's a very narrow definition which I don't think applies to how ukip position themselves, eg as not part of the "Westminster Ruling Elite".

Even if you use that definition, most of ukip's big hitters come from established parties (ex-Tories mainly), are bankrolled by big business and generally come from the public school, city trading, millionaire wing of the ruling classes. Rather than being "anti-establishment", they are at the core of established power and privilege in this country.


It means against the establishment. The establishment want us to stay in the EU, all 3 parties.

UKIP only have one big hitter and I couldn't care less where he came from or who bankrolls them, nor the rest. If they were at the core of power, they'd be in power.

But please knock yourself out and find these powerful and privilged who are the core of this "establishment". I'm sure we could find many more for the "established" 3 parties.

This quarter:
[Link]

Last year:
[Link]


Which shows that none of the parties is in it for 'the common man' or 'joe public'. This is why Brand refuses to vote. They are all different hues of the same s***e.
It doesn't matter who you vote for, they are all in it for themselves rather than ll of us being in it together.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Seth's Profile Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 02 Dec 14 5.52pm Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 5.13pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.51pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 2.19pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 1.45pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 12.46pm

It hasn't positioned itself. If you aren't one of the 3 main political parties (in England) you are by definition not established.


Of course it has. They're forever banging on about how anti-establishment they are but are run and bankrolled by the very establishment they profess to be fighting against. It's a blatant charade.


You can't position yourself as something when it is defined by fact. They're either established or they're not.

That they've only just got their first MPs I think we know which one it is.


"Anti-establishment" doesn't just mean "not one of the 3 main Westminster parties". That's a very narrow definition which I don't think applies to how ukip position themselves, eg as not part of the "Westminster Ruling Elite".

Even if you use that definition, most of ukip's big hitters come from established parties (ex-Tories mainly), are bankrolled by big business and generally come from the public school, city trading, millionaire wing of the ruling classes. Rather than being "anti-establishment", they are at the core of established power and privilege in this country.


It means against the establishment. The establishment want us to stay in the EU, all 3 parties.

UKIP only have one big hitter and I couldn't care less where he came from or who bankrolls them, nor the rest. If they were at the core of power, they'd be in power.

But please knock yourself out and find these powerful and privilged who are the core of this "establishment". I'm sure we could find many more for the "established" 3 parties.

This quarter:
[Link]

Last year:
[Link]


I don't need to "knock myself out" or scrutinise the electoral commission's stats to know how ukip are financed, and to understand what they in fact stand for. Farage is a Thatcherite former Tory activist, ex-public school city trader who thinks the British public are so stupid they'll vote for anyone drinking a pint who isn't from one of the three main parties.

Unfortunately, on that point, he appears to be correct.

Just How Anti-Establishment Is Nigel Farage's Ukip? [Link]

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 02 Dec 14 9.45pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 5.52pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 5.13pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 3.51pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 2.19pm

Quote Seth at 02 Dec 2014 1.45pm

Quote Stuk at 02 Dec 2014 12.46pm

It hasn't positioned itself. If you aren't one of the 3 main political parties (in England) you are by definition not established.


Of course it has. They're forever banging on about how anti-establishment they are but are run and bankrolled by the very establishment they profess to be fighting against. It's a blatant charade.


You can't position yourself as something when it is defined by fact. They're either established or they're not.

That they've only just got their first MPs I think we know which one it is.


"Anti-establishment" doesn't just mean "not one of the 3 main Westminster parties". That's a very narrow definition which I don't think applies to how ukip position themselves, eg as not part of the "Westminster Ruling Elite".

Even if you use that definition, most of ukip's big hitters come from established parties (ex-Tories mainly), are bankrolled by big business and generally come from the public school, city trading, millionaire wing of the ruling classes. Rather than being "anti-establishment", they are at the core of established power and privilege in this country.


It means against the establishment. The establishment want us to stay in the EU, all 3 parties.

UKIP only have one big hitter and I couldn't care less where he came from or who bankrolls them, nor the rest. If they were at the core of power, they'd be in power.

But please knock yourself out and find these powerful and privilged who are the core of this "establishment". I'm sure we could find many more for the "established" 3 parties.

This quarter:
[Link]

Last year:
[Link]


I don't need to "knock myself out" or scrutinise the electoral commission's stats to know how ukip are financed, and to understand what they in fact stand for. Farage is a Thatcherite former Tory activist, ex-public school city trader who thinks the British public are so stupid they'll vote for anyone drinking a pint who isn't from one of the three main parties.

Unfortunately, on that point, he appears to be correct.

Just How Anti-Establishment Is Nigel Farage's Ukip? [Link]


Seth:

I know you won't respond to this as after the homophobic rant you launched at me, you realised you couldn't control your emotion and became everything you hated, despite your self righteous look at me and the stay at home dad image you like to portray.

However, I feel it best to point something out. That is, despite your best efforts recently, you come over as a deluded and obsessed anti UKIP campaigner who shouts much, but says little. You cannot turn the tide of UKIP without some sort of ideology that says how a leftish, pro European, pro immigrant, pro localised government would work. Basically, you can spunk your pants at the thoughts of the Greens nod the SNP taking control but it ain't gonna happen. Therefore, please explain to me how your way government will work, how it will be funded, how you will depose the establishment and how you will find a charismatic and functional leader who will provide the impetus for change.

Michael and Gusset and Psychobabble - please let Seth respond.

Edited by matt_himself (02 Dec 2014 9.46pm)

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 138 of 311 < 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic