Whether or not I support a given law, one is best served to obey them lest they be thrown in jail.

Campaign finance laws are not remotely contentious so comparing them to transgender topics is pretty nonsensical.

One mans persecution is another mans oversight, and therein lies the rub.

It would be nice to know who holds financial sway over trump considering he lost over 1 billion dollars in the 80s/90s and couldn’t get financing via American banks, and had to go with Deutsche Bank and God knows who else. DB has a well earned reputation for money laundering and other illegal acts.

Incorrect comparison again, Stirlingsays. If you would actually read the Mueller report and not take the right wing media version, you would see details of a systematic, far reaching and widespread social media campaign. Comparing that to Clinton and the Saudis is a complete nonsense and I think you must realize that?

Not familiar with the former federal prosecutor story? Perhaps more milkshake watching? It’s been all over the news here, perhaps not there. Allow me to bring you up to speed:

[Link]

I consider obstruction of justice serious, and now you have heard about it, as I have told you many times now.

Right, let's wrap this thread up:

That's worthy of Barr himself. Doesn't work like that for either of you.

In conclusion, statistics show that Trump is one of the best presidents of all time and the MSM hate him because he doesn't fit their elitist agenda, nor does he doff his cap to them.

Mark Twain gave the response to that, which could have been written with Trump in mind. He said, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."

Anyone who thinks different is ignoring facts simply because they don't like him.

Simply untrue. It's far from just not liking him. I didn't like Thatcher but I recognised her contribution and necessity at a particular time in our history. Trump is an abomination. An embarrassment to decency and a disaster of a POTUS.

On to the next one, maybe: "Obama: is he fit to lace Trump's boots?" I'll kick it off with no.

The one thing this thread has taught me is that it's kinda pointless arguing with a fruitcake.

Unless you kind of have time for that fruitcake. As not all fruitcakes are the same.....some contain serious levels of nuttiness.

I think I knew this beforehand but I had more energy 240 pages ago.

Edited by Stirlingsays (11 May 2019 9.44am)

I am glad we can all agree on this. There are plenty of fruit cakes on the Trump supporting sites as well as one in the White House who deserves our sympathy because he cannot be right in the head.

I suppose it all depends upon your taste in fruit. Some taste extremely unpleasant and bitter to the core.

Of course, all the fruitcakes ONLY exist on the Trump side... I always find it funny when someone can have so much hate for a person they have never met. Just for wearing a GOP badge.

Trump was mentioned at least 318 times in rap lyrics between 1989 and 2016. Then he became a racist the day he became a Republican nominee, how odd!

Edited by Penge Eagle (11 May 2019 2.01pm)

With no hint of malice, here is who I feel sorry for the most:

The suckers that trump has tricked and conned. He is a fraud, liar, crook and cheat. Utterly dishonest to his core and also a master manipulator. He is a snake oil salesman, nothing more.

As someone once said, there is one born every minute.

I don’t care for Idi Amin or Pol Pot either, and I never met either of them.

If people only talked about and debated about people they had met, that would be taking us back to the dark ages. Even then despots like trump were vilified by those who hadn’t met them. Perhaps we need to back to the era of the caveman, or Stephen Miller as he is sometimes called.

As for Trump appearing in rap songs, along with your “people haven’t met him” comment this secondary element leads me to conclude this is the Cadbury’s fruit and nut of recent posts on this thread.

Considering you criticize myself and others for not focusing enough on Trump’s policies, I guess you are guilty of that aswell.

You just described virtually every politician.

That's both cynical and wrong. Most politicians do a difficult job to the best of their ability, which is some cases is fairly limited. I just don't believe this "they are all the same" idea is the least bit true. They differ in approach but most are sincere, whilst some are chancers.

Don't you get it yet?

A large part of the reason why we celebrate Trump is because he antagonises people like you.

That seems a pretty dumb reason to approve of who-ever holds the position of leader of the free world.