This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The will of the people at the last election was to return a Tory government under a fptp system. The Tories, as has been clearly shown several times, did NOT win overwhelmingly at all. It was only the fptp system which delivered a large majority. You are very inconsistant in your views of our democracy. According to you our MPs are representatives and not delegates because that's the way it has been for decades yet you decry the First Past The Post System as being undemocratic despite it being part of our democratic system for over 130 years
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
You are very inconsistant in your views of our democracy. According to you our MPs are representatives and not delegates because that's the way it has been for decades yet you decry the First Past The Post System as being undemocratic despite it being part of our democratic system for over 130 years There is no inconsistency at all. I am rock solid in my belief that in our system of representative government it is for our MPs to take all decisions on our behalf. Our only role is to choose who represents us. Deciding what system we use to make our choice is an entirely separate issue. If, as I think has become obvious, the long standing method we have been using is producing unrepresentative governments, and leaving people effectively disenfranchised, then it's time for a change so we can improve things. You are trying to conflate chalk with cheese.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
it's time for a change so we can improve things. Hutber's Law will come into effect
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There is no inconsistency at all. I am rock solid in my belief that in our system of representative government it is for our MPs to take all decisions on our behalf. Our only role is to choose who represents us. Deciding what system we use to make our choice is an entirely separate issue. If, as I think has become obvious, the long standing method we have been using is producing unrepresentative governments, and leaving people effectively disenfranchised, then it's time for a change so we can improve things. You are trying to conflate chalk with cheese. We voted against PR a few years back. How many times do you want to vote on it before it meets your apparently flexible standards for being democratic? Would that be when you get your own way by any chance?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you recheck my initial comment you will read my own "feelings". My friend is only "invisible" to the others here. He is a fellow Palace fan and uses the HOL from time to time, especially during transfer windows, although he doesn't post and I am not sure is even a member. The will of the people at the last election was to return a Tory government under a fptp system. Why they did that is a matter of some conjecture. Brexit undoubtedly played a significant part, the primary driving force though being, in my opinion, a weariness with the situation and a belief that any resolution was better than none. The Tories, as has been clearly shown several times, did NOT win overwhelmingly at all. It was only the fptp system which delivered a large majority. The 2016 referendum was a single issue vote, which was split almost straight down the middle, with just a 4% difference. All recent polls on the same single issue indicate that if that question was asked today the result would again be split down the middle but with the balance the other way. As we now know much more in 2020 than we did 4 years ago on that subject it follows that our current opinion ought to matter more than the original one. It also follows that if the 2016 referendum result was measured by counting votes from across the whole country, and not via a fptp system in constituencies, that to make a comparison with the 2019 election we also need to look at the total number of votes cast. When we do that we can see that more people voted against the Tories than for them, and that was in spite of a disastrous performance by the Labour party. So the country is NOT being "ripped apart" by people like me at all. When more people are now in favour of remaining in the EU yet our system, together with Cameron's initial mistake, is delivering what they don't want, this is government by a minority. I recognise realities and that we cannot change the system instantly, so some kind of Brexit is going to happen. No-one though is going to convince me it is either wise or what the people, by a small majority, now actually want. These divisions have existed, in one form or another, for decades and they aren't going to subside any time soon. In the past it was the Eurosceptics making all the noise and latterly all the running. That has now changed. If Farage had lost he wouldn't have stopped campaigning and nor now will Euro enthusiasts like me. You really cannot expect anything different. The boot is just now on the other foot and is starting to kick.
There is lots to do. How exactly do you KNOW that more people want to remain in the EU than want to leave....surely if that was the case, MORE people would have voted for anyone other than the Tories? LibDems wanted to remain so why didnt everyone who wanted to remain vote for them?? A majority voted to leave and a majority voted for Tories, whats so difficult for you to understand?? If you are using 'the polls suggest' arguement, the polls have been wrong plenty of times, why not now?? YOU LOST< GET OVER IT!!
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Hutber's Law will come into effect Are you perhaps thinking of Brexit?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
How exactly do you KNOW that more people want to remain in the EU than want to leave....surely if that was the case, MORE people would have voted for anyone other than the Tories? LibDems wanted to remain so why didnt everyone who wanted to remain vote for them?? A majority voted to leave and a majority voted for Tories, whats so difficult for you to understand?? If you are using 'the polls suggest' arguement, the polls have been wrong plenty of times, why not now?? YOU LOST< GET OVER IT!!
I don't "know" anymore than you don't. However, all the polls suggest that is the case and although they can, of course, be wrong they are the best guide we have right now. It's just applying basic logic. The LibDems would have fared much better if Farage had not pulled his stunt or under a PR system. The election result is not any kind of reliable guide to the people's current attitude to leaving the EU, despite all the bs to the contrary. We voted in a Tory government with a huge majority but by a minority of the votes cast. How we would respond to an "in or out" question, or even a "which type" question remains unknown. This "you lost" argument is the most nonsensical and silly response I can imagine. It's resonant of the playground. I can only imagine how Farage might respond to such claims if the 2016 referendum had split the other way by the same margin.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The LibDems would have fared much better if Farage had not pulled his stunt Isn't that the same stunt that the Lib Dems pulled with Plaid Cymru and The Green party? Farage just copied them
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't "know" anymore than you don't. However, all the polls suggest that is the case and although they can, of course, be wrong they are the best guide we have right now. It's just applying basic logic. The LibDems would have fared much better if Farage had not pulled his stunt or under a PR system. The election result is not any kind of reliable guide to the people's current attitude to leaving the EU, despite all the bs to the contrary. We voted in a Tory government with a huge majority but by a minority of the votes cast. How we would respond to an "in or out" question, or even a "which type" question remains unknown. This "you lost" argument is the most nonsensical and silly response I can imagine. It's resonant of the playground. I can only imagine how Farage might respond to such claims if the 2016 referendum had split the other way by the same margin.
If there is a vote, the side with themost votes WINS....so the other LOSES...why dont you understand simple maths...52% beats 48% every day!! and you still have to get an insult or two in, dont you??
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Isn't that the same stunt that the Lib Dems pulled with Plaid Cymru and The Green party? Farage just copied them Hardly. Having previously announced he would fight all 650 seats he withdrew from all those where he feared splitting the vote with the Tories would let the LibDems actually gain some representation close to their true level of support. Having done, I suspect, some kind of cloak and dagger deal with the Tories. The LibDems just tried to make sure they didn't waste resources whilst ensuring the minor parties were given some chance of getting represented. Farage's action was all about fixing the result to suit his own agenda.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
As I said. On this scale though it is pretty unlikely.
I will decide whether and where I will fight, unless and until I am chucked off the site. As this is not just a place for any particular world view I feel that right now a few of you need to hear alternatives. My feeling. My decision. If there is a vote, the side with themost votes WINS....so the other LOSES...why dont you understand simple maths...52% beats 48% every day!! and you still have to get an insult or two in, dont you?? No-one wins when the decision is taken this way and the result is so close. Everyone stays dissatisfied, even those who were on the side that gained a tiny majority on one particular day 4 years ago. "Like minded fools is not an insult I suppose?" Edited by Wisbech Eagle (16 Jan 2020 8.13pm)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Edited by Wisbech Eagle (16 Jan 2020 8.13pm) yeah whatever, you dont like the result you bitch about it ad infinitum (look it up) You are so boring I think Ill just ignore your inane ramblings until you get as bored as the rest of us and just fade away... Fed up with your continuos belittling of anyone who do9esnt agree with your warped views....goodbye old man, enough is enough!! as for 'like minded fools' I see you dont like it when someone does it to you.......tough!!! Edited by the silurian (16 Jan 2020 9.38pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
yeah whatever, you dont like the result you bitch about it ad infinitum (look it up) You are so boring I think Ill just ignore your inane ramblings until you get as bored as the rest of us and just fade away... Fed up with your continuos belittling of anyone who do9esnt agree with your warped views....goodbye old man, enough is enough!! as for 'like minded fools' I see you dont like it when someone does it to you.......tough!!! Edited by the silurian (16 Jan 2020 9.38pm) You completely misunderstand me. I don't give a monkey's f*ck about any insults I get here. They just amuse me as they always say so much more about those who are reduced to them than their intended target. Some advice! If you don't like being belittled try being a little bit bigger then the impact won't be quite so noticable.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You completely misunderstand me. I don't give a monkey's f*ck about any insults I get here. They just amuse me as they always say so much more about those who are reduced to them than their intended target. Some advice! If you don't like being belittled try being a little bit bigger then the impact won't be quite so noticable.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You completely misunderstand me. I don't give a monkey's f*ck about any insults I get here. They just amuse me as they always say so much more about those who are reduced to them than their intended target. Some advice! If you don't like being belittled try being a little bit bigger then the impact won't be quite so noticable. Be not disturbed at being misunderstood; be disturbed rather at not being understanding. Chinese Proverbs
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
This thread is just going around in parliamentary procedure circles without getting to the core point which is, why does leaving the EU cause such a problem with remainers? What overwhelming benefits have we received over the years which justify us staying in? We are a huge net payer rather than receiver into the EU system so what benefits have we had as a country from that relationship? I don’t need an essay response to this, just please tell me what exactly we are going to be missing out on by leaving. This is the information people need to know, but it is talked about very little. The single market and freedom of movement, if you see complete freedom of movement as a benefit.
COYP |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.