This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Yes, it is good enough I repeat...Head stuck up your arse" it means that you have to start paying more attention to what's going on around you. It could also mean that you have to stop being so consumed with yourself, and your own well being, and stop being so conceited
So it truly is not good enough. That has zilch to do with me, my well being or alleged conceit. It solely concerns you and whether your comment has any merit. So let's see them please.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
No it wasn't intended for you. Listen Wisbech, our worldviews are so polar opposite that I kind of don't see the point. Also, you don't debate ideas you just stonewall in very long posts and dance around pins and then don't bother reading replies....it's bad for my blood pressure. I'd rather argue with posters with whom I find to be serious actors or at least entertaining ones. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 May 2019 11.23pm) I have tried to debate with you countless times but you have built a high wall of prejudice around you through which other concepts cannot penetrate. You ignore questions when you know answering them will demonstrate weaknesses. Now you try to use excuses as I suspect you have run out of answers. I wouldn't want to be responsible for raising your blood pressure so don't bother reading my replies if that helps you. It won't though stop me countering any falsehoods I see being posted by you. Judging by the past you should expect a steady stream.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Trump and Orban just met at the White House. The god emperor and prodigy. Dumb and Dumber seems more apt.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| ChrisGC |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have tried to debate with you countless times but you have built a high wall of prejudice around you through which other concepts cannot penetrate. You ignore questions when you know answering them will demonstrate weaknesses. Now you try to use excuses as I suspect you have run out of answers. I wouldn't want to be responsible for raising your blood pressure so don't bother reading my replies if that helps you. It won't though stop me countering any falsehoods I see being posted by you. Judging by the past you should expect a steady stream. You are talking about Stirling and not yourself, right? Oh dear o dear.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
So it truly is not good enough. That has zilch to do with me, my well being or alleged conceit. It solely concerns you and whether your comment has any merit. So let's see them please. If someone makes a statement with which you don’t agree then it’s up to you to disprove it. There’s really no point in providing references because they’re ignored or dismissed.
|
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
So it truly is not good enough. That has zilch to do with me, my well being or alleged conceit. It solely concerns you and whether your comment has any merit. So let's see them please. Why don't you provide me with the dictionaries and encyclopaedias that don't use it as a definition. And yes it is good enough, and has everything to do with your alleged well being... Also, I'm not your skivvy do your own work it's not that difficult to find out. So, go on give it a go you might surprise yourself/ego Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.30am) Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.31am) Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.32am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Why don't you provide me with the dictionaries and encyclopaedias that don't use it as a definition. And yes it is good enough, and has everything to do with your alleged well being... Also, I'm not your skivvy do your own work it's not that difficult to find out. So, go on give it a go you might surprise yourself/ego Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.30am) Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.31am) Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.32am) Make enough edits there?
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Make enough edits there? I guess if you’re being criticised for the accuracy of your posts it pays to get them right.
|
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Make enough edits there? Why what's it got to do with you? Don't bother me with your primary school jibes...or 3rd grade humour. I see you use "h"Infront of "real" when interacting with hrolf. I know in your child like mind that must seem really amusing...but if want to come across as smart Main eagle with me, try harder. I can't be bothered having a battle of wits against a ten year old.. EFA...and I might edit it again once I've read through it again...ok big boy! Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 5.49am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
If someone makes a statement with which you don’t agree then it’s up to you to disprove it. There’s really no point in providing references because they’re ignored or dismissed. Nonsense. It was claimed they were found in dictionaries and not just personal definitions which I could very easily trash. If they are then then need to be referenced or the claim is worthless.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Why don't you provide me with the dictionaries and encyclopaedias that don't use it as a definition. And yes it is good enough, and has everything to do with your alleged well being... Also, I'm not your skivvy do your own work it's not that difficult to find out. So, go on give it a go you might surprise yourself/ego Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.30am) Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.31am) Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 12.32am) Maybe because none do? I entered "White race" into the OED search engine and it gave a nil return, defaulting just to "race". Not found in Websters either! Caucasian/Europid returns nothing either but the OED defines Caucasian as "North American White-skinned; of European origin". This term, along with "African American" is a much criticised abuse of English by purists. So now let's see yours. As I suspect they include such things as the "Urban dictionary" or worse, I want to be clear on their authenticity. Particularly on the term "White race" which I don't believe is defined anywhere.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Nonsense. It was claimed they were found in dictionaries and not just personal definitions which I could very easily trash. If they are then then need to be referenced or the claim is worthless. The only problem is that you don’t make the rules. If you can’t be bothered to look up a reference yourself then don’t reply to a post.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Giuliani says Biden is going to be investigated......juicy stuff and what goes around comes around. The level of smearing targeted at only a possible Democratic choice to be their candidate to run against Trump this at this point in the election cycle says so much more about how scared Trump is than it does about anything that Biden might have done. For sure though what goes around comes around and as there is so much yet to be played out in the Trump saga it is only part way of it's journey. The level of diversion now being attempted, with the talk of investigating the investigators etc etc just looks ridiculous to anyone with an ounce of common sense. Fortunately there are still enough good and honest people left in the USA who will quietly work to ensure that their constitution and the law always triumphs. Insult them as the "Deep state" all you like but they will not be deterred.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The only problem is that you don’t make the rules. If you can’t be bothered to look up a reference yourself then don’t reply to a post. There are none that I can find. Not in any recognised, authentic, authoritative dictionary. Hence the request. Quoting words that appear to arrive out of thin air is not a quote. It is an opinion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There are none that I can find. Not in any recognised, authentic, authoritative dictionary. Hence the request. Quoting words that appear to arrive out of thin air is not a quote. It is an opinion. White race. Loosely the Caucasoid group of people.
|
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Maybe because none do? I entered "White race" into the OED search engine and it gave a nil return, defaulting just to "race". Not found in Websters either! Caucasian/Europid returns nothing either but the OED defines Caucasian as "North American White-skinned; of European origin". This term, along with "African American" is a much criticised abuse of English by purists. So now let's see yours. As I suspect they include such things as the "Urban dictionary" or worse, I want to be clear on their authenticity. Particularly on the term "White race" which I don't believe is defined anywhere. I'm only doing this because of your difficulty with search engines adjective
|
|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Why what's it got to do with you? Don't bother me with your primary school jibes...or 3rd grade humour. I see you use "h"Infront of "real" when interacting with hrolf. I know in your child like mind that must seem really amusing...but if want to come across as smart Main eagle with me, try harder. I can't be bothered having a battle of wits against a ten year old.. EFA...and I might edit it again once I've read through it again...ok big boy! Edited by Park Road (15 May 2019 5.49am) If you need 4 edits I think that tells it’s own story.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Maybe because none do? I entered "White race" into the OED search engine and it gave a nil return, defaulting just to "race". Not found in Websters either! Caucasian/Europid returns nothing either but the OED defines Caucasian as "North American White-skinned; of European origin". This term, along with "African American" is a much criticised abuse of English by purists. So now let's see yours. As I suspect they include such things as the "Urban dictionary" or worse, I want to be clear on their authenticity. Particularly on the term "White race" which I don't believe is defined anywhere.
Stop telling people they don't have a racial identity from your near exclusively white enclave of Cornwall. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 May 2019 3.47am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Park Road |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
If you need 4 edits I think that tells it’s own story. What story is that then ?
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.