This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If we could build a great big wall all around the UK and never let anyone in, or out, ever again, and become totally self-sufficient in every aspect of life, feeding ourselves and manufacturing all we needed, then your plan might work. We would of course have to commit huge sums to our defence too. Life would be very hard and really boring. A bit like North Korea without the fun. There is though a basic problem. The people wouldn't accept it for a moment. The rest of the world exists. We are part of it and if they now think globally we have no choice than to do so too. They are both our customers and our suppliers. Today's world is interdependent. Mess with it and it's you that gets hurt. Sounds like a tantrum describing bitter rubbish.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's been confirmed that Big Ben will bong on the 31st of December as we transition from the EU. I just had this awful vision of Tekkers, in a frock, smoking dope
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If we could build a great big wall all around the UK and never let anyone in, or out, ever again, and become totally self-sufficient in every aspect of life, feeding ourselves and manufacturing all we needed, then your plan might work. We would of course have to commit huge sums to our defence too. Life would be very hard and really boring. A bit like North Korea without the fun. There is though a basic problem. The people wouldn't accept it for a moment. The rest of the world exists. We are part of it and if they now think globally we have no choice than to do so too. They are both our customers and our suppliers. Today's world is interdependent. Mess with it and it's you that gets hurt. Mistake 101 by the Remainers. Brexit is about expanding our horizons beyond the EU not pulling up the drawbridge. Yes we want a sensible immigration policy but that should be in the control of the elected government. When Labour next win I have no doubt that they will adjust the policy as is their right. As for self sufficiency what sensible person would not be in favour of it. Do we really want to rely on Russia and the Middle east for our energy? As for food I am fine with importing it especially the exotics but would prefer the basics to be home grown we were 6 weeks from starvation during WW2. Brexit should be an outward looking UK in control of its own affairs and trading with other nations. In this century the growth markets will not be US and Europe but the rest of the world we have a great opportunity to exploit that.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Mistake 101 by the Remainers. Brexit is about expanding our horizons beyond the EU not pulling up the drawbridge. Yes we want a sensible immigration policy but that should be in the control of the elected government. When Labour next win I have no doubt that they will adjust the policy as is their right. As for self sufficiency what sensible person would not be in favour of it. Do we really want to rely on Russia and the Middle east for our energy? As for food I am fine with importing it especially the exotics but would prefer the basics to be home grown we were 6 weeks from starvation during WW2. Brexit should be an outward looking UK in control of its own affairs and trading with other nations. In this century the growth markets will not be US and Europe but the rest of the world we have a great opportunity to exploit that. Mistake 101 for brexiteers, lots of wishful thinking and no assurance 102 expect anything other than a race to the bottom 103 trust the Government 104 overlook the hand of Russia in precipitating this most damaging move for both the UK and EU. Trust nobody unless they have the same skin in the game as us.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Mistake 101 for brexiteers, lots of wishful thinking and no assurance 102 expect anything other than a race to the bottom 103 trust the Government 104 overlook the hand of Russia in precipitating this most damaging move for both the UK and EU. Trust nobody unless they have the same skin in the game as us. Well then vote for a government that you think reflects your views I believe they call it democracy, not perfect but better than the alternatives. Even WE believes in it he said respect the vote the other day on a separate thread.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
57 trade deals signed so far.
I doubt the SNP will be getting many votes in that sector if they continue with these threats. Edited by Badger11 (13 Dec 2020 9.46am) There's quite a simple compromise on this fishing standoff and one that I can't see either side will see as unreasonable. Just say pollocks to the French, and we keep the rest. If pushed, pollocks to Scotland as well.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
|
Originally posted by mezzer
There's quite a simple compromise on this fishing standoff and one that I can't see either side will see as unreasonable. Just say pollocks to the French, and we keep the rest. If pushed, pollocks to Scotland as well. LOL Apparently the French want a 10 year deal which gives them same as now. That is too long I would offer them a 5 year deal with the same as now for the first and possibly the 2nd year and then decreasing after that to say 50% by the end of that deal. At the end of 5 years have another look if the British fleet is not taking up its full quota by then then I think there is wiggle room. The UK wants an annual deal I think that is a starting point for negotiations, do we really want to be having this row with the EU every year? A 5 year deal allows both sides to plan, 10 years is too long.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Really wary of this fishing stuff. In terms of the bigger picture, it is almost an irrelevance and whilst the significance of it in terms of an actual real example of where sovereignty will be strengthened by our departure (every legal precedent is on the UK's side) it is primarily symbolic rather than a genuine economic consideration. What I really want to scrutinise is the other stuff about this 'level playing field' malarky. Because the whole point of Brexit is to make the UK more competitive. If we have been betrayed on that question then it means the wider 'Brexit' campaign is not over yet. My rather cynical/paranoid view is that fishing is a smoke screen both sides are using to hide the real meat of any deal from genuine scrutiny until it is voted through. Edited by Matov (18 Dec 2020 1.07pm) As always Matov you hit the nail on the head. I really suspect this is all stage management to frighten us into accepting EU control. Boris must stand his ground. Your point on fishing is valid if that is really the only hold up I would be prepared to compromise.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Mistake 101 by the Remainers. Brexit is about expanding our horizons beyond the EU not pulling up the drawbridge. Yes we want a sensible immigration policy but that should be in the control of the elected government. When Labour next win I have no doubt that they will adjust the policy as is their right. As for self sufficiency what sensible person would not be in favour of it. Do we really want to rely on Russia and the Middle east for our energy? As for food I am fine with importing it especially the exotics but would prefer the basics to be home grown we were 6 weeks from starvation during WW2. Brexit should be an outward looking UK in control of its own affairs and trading with other nations. In this century the growth markets will not be US and Europe but the rest of the world we have a great opportunity to exploit that. Indeed. The stupid comments by certain posters are frankly pathetic. Some people clearly want us to be absorbed into the inevitable US of E and have policy dictated by Germany. All these kinds of issues were around when the USA formed and still remain to this day. Even when they gained independence, many were not happy about that, and subsequently, anti federalists complained about the new national government. That was Americans governing Americans. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (18 Dec 2020 4.02pm)
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by mezzer
There's quite a simple compromise on this fishing standoff and one that I can't see either side will see as unreasonable. Just say pollocks to the French, and we keep the rest. If pushed, pollocks to Scotland as well. The solutions are pretty simple. Theres no real flurry of activity from either side in terms of implementing no-deal contingency plans. No major recruitment and training drives or panics. We've said we'll send out a couple of ships to patrol waters. That's about it. There seem to be no leaks at all from anyone in the tight lipped negotiating teams on either side. I really think the deal may be pretty much done. Politician's are just making a song and dance to show they fought out negotiations until the very end.
|
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by kevlee
The fish issue is what Brext is all about. Its about sovereignty and the right to stick two fingers up to the EU and say F-uck you.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Indeed. The stupid comments by certain posters are frankly pathetic. Some people clearly want us to be absorbed into the inevitable US of E and have policy dictated by Germany. All these kinds of issues were around when the USA formed and still remain to this day. Even when they gained independence, many were not happy about that, and subsequently, anti federalists complained about the new national government. That was Americans governing Americans. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (18 Dec 2020 4.02pm) Great argument. Basically you are recommending US states should leave the Union. The good news is that makes way for us to become a protectorate of the USA, de facto even if not in law. Edited by Mapletree (18 Dec 2020 10.10pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Great argument. Basically you are recommending US states should leave the Union. The good news is that makes way for us to become a protectorate of the USA, de facto even if not in law. Edited by Mapletree (18 Dec 2020 10.10pm) Really? I thought I was giving a second rate history lesson.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
What's hilarious is to think that the EU can afford to not sell its goods to the UK. Yes, all French wine will be gone - they'd rather pour it down the sink. There will be no VWs, BMWs, Citroëns, yeah of course mate. They will all be fine with half their business gone. French cars are s***e anyway.
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
What's hilarious is to think that the EU can afford to not sell its goods to the UK. Yes, all French wine will be gone - they'd rather pour it down the sink. There will be no VWs, BMWs, Citroëns, yeah of course mate. They will all be fine with half their business gone. French cars are s***e anyway.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.