This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What a ridiculous post. There is no comparison between previous migrations and the current masses. Even so, crime and immigration has always been linked going back hundreds of years. Only a fool would deny that. You accuse others of what you have persistently done yourself, since you started giving us all the benefit of your dubious wisdom. Why is there no comparison between previous large groups of immigrants that entered Britain and the groups that you are focus on? What evidence is there that crime and immigration have been linked for hundreds of years? This post suggests that in the case of the Huguenot they pretty much only brought benefits to Britain.
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
So when you don't like the data it is fake and when you do it is ok? What you have failed to show is that there is a link between crime and immigration. I see that you want to draw a convenient line as to when the mass migrations that worries you begin. The 40,000 and 50,000 Huguenots that came to Britain between 1670 to 1710 or the 150,000 Jews that settled in Britain from the late 19th century until the early 20th century are of no concern to you? I understand that you want to start your argument with the arrival of the Empire Windrush in 1948? What you describe as 'waffle' is just information that you find difficult to deal with. The logic of your argument is shot to pieces if you resort to rubbish such as, "often correlation is the cause". This means nothing and I am pretty sure that you know it. Correlation with what? You going to have to sort yourself out regarding statistical methodology if you want to pursue this root. I used the home office's own statistics and quoted the home office words which stated the increase.....roughly double the rate from the sixties. I don't know how clearer that can be. As for you comparing 50, 000 Europeans over a 40 year period to today where two times that come in every year many from vastly different cultures....When the numbers are in the many millions that have settled here since WW2. I don't think I can take your responses seriously now. I've started listening to the 'fall of Rome' book and so far even it's not making your original commentary that immigration played no part look very credible. I think for my part I'd like to end it here as I don't think this is very productive. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2021 10.01pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
there is no causal link between a ton of 'ethnic group x' arriving into the country and thereafter a ton of the same ethnic group ending up in prison.....
Someone who is a regular on here is going to have to help me out with Palazio Vecchio. I cannot believe that he is as stupid as he appears from his posts. I can only conclude that he has taken on this comic persona for the laughs.
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
Someone who is a regular on here is going to have to help me out with Palazio Vecchio. I cannot believe that he is as stupid as he appears from his posts. I can only conclude that he has taken on this comic persona for the laughs. so who is the fool ? the madman in the street or the normal who stops to debate with him ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I used the home office's own statistics and quoted the home office words which stated the increase.....roughly double the rate from the sixties. I don't know how clearer that can be. As for you comparing 50, 000 Europeans over a 40 year period to today where two times that come in every year many from vastly different cultures....When the numbers are in the many millions that have settled here since WW2. I don't think I can take your responses seriously now. I've started listening to the 'fall of Rome' book and so far even it's not making your original commentary that immigration played no part look very credible. I think for my part I'd like to end it here as I don't think this is very productive. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Sep 2021 10.01pm) This is getting tiresome. You show correlation, but you do not show causality. Is very very simple. You could say that the Beatles became popular in the 1960s and crime when up, therefore the Beatles caused an increase in crime. This is what you are doing. I know this is going to hurt you terribly but I don't think I can take your responses seriously either. Glad that you are enjoying the book. I gave mine away so I don't have it to hand. Did you download it to a Kindel? I might go back and read it again. Anyway, I am sure this is not so much adieu as au revoir.
|
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
so who is the fool ? the madman in the street or the normal who stops to debate with him ? Just when I am sure that you are an idiot, you pop in a shockingly poor surealist poem. Maybe you are just an algorithm?
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
Just when I am sure that you are an idiot ... nice
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
nice but true. Have you reported him to the moderators yet for cyber-bullying ? Whinger.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
For me, and I probably have my ‘simple’ head on but people should be able to live where they want and be allowed to make a better left for themselves. These ppl are desperate, sleeping in dangerous conditions. The money we give to France, can we need build new communities, schools etc.., I read that only a small % of the uk is actually built on. My British passport allows me to visit many countries, the majority of them without a visa. But if you have a different passport, you might not be so lucky. How is this fair? Fortunately this problem is not going away and there is nothing that can really be done. Thousands of ppl
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
Just when I am sure that you are an idiot, you pop in a shockingly poor surealist poem. Maybe you are just an algorithm? This made me chuckle
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Ali_Campbell
For me, and I probably have my ‘simple’ head on but people should be able to live where they want and be allowed to make a better left for themselves. These ppl are desperate, sleeping in dangerous conditions. The money we give to France, can we need build new communities, schools etc.., I read that only a small % of the uk is actually built on. My British passport allows me to visit many countries, the majority of them without a visa. But if you have a different passport, you might not be so lucky. How is this fair? Fortunately this problem is not going away and there is nothing that can really be done. Thousands of ppl
|
|
|
Originally posted by Ali_Campbell
For me, and I probably have my ‘simple’ head on but people should be able to live where they want and be allowed to make a better left for themselves. These ppl are desperate, sleeping in dangerous conditions. The money we give to France, can we need build new communities, schools etc.., I read that only a small % of the uk is actually built on. My British passport allows me to visit many countries, the majority of them without a visa. But if you have a different passport, you might not be so lucky. How is this fair? Fortunately this problem is not going away and there is nothing that can really be done. Thousands of ppl Not having a go at you but that is a very simplistic view. If your ideas came to fruition would you be happy to allow foreign convicted murderers/rapists/ paedos to enter unchecked? Believe me that will happen, as some try to enter now, I have seen them. There are many reasons for certain countries to require a visa, some political, some reciprocal, some for security reasons. Edited by Spiderman (14 Sep 2021 7.32am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
Why is there no comparison between previous large groups of immigrants that entered Britain and the groups that you are focus on? What evidence is there that crime and immigration have been linked for hundreds of years? This post suggests that in the case of the Huguenot they pretty much only brought benefits to Britain. Come off it. You are choosing one example of a specific group of immigrants and claiming them to be representative of immigrants as a whole. Huguenots were French Protestants. Hardly different culturally, and that many people probably come here every week now. I'm sorry, but you are starting to bore me. We have heard all this denial nonsense from others like you for years, and it does not tally with the real world. Crime among immigrant and offspring of immigrants is much higher than the population as a whole. Some demographics are much more likely to commit crime than others. It's that simple. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 7.57am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
This is getting tiresome. You show correlation, but you do not show causality. Is very very simple. You could say that the Beatles became popular in the 1960s and crime when up, therefore the Beatles caused an increase in crime. This is what you are doing. I know this is going to hurt you terribly but I don't think I can take your responses seriously either. Glad that you are enjoying the book. I gave mine away so I don't have it to hand. Did you download it to a Kindel? I might go back and read it again. Anyway, I am sure this is not so much adieu as au revoir. Just like the Godfather 3 you pull me back in. Really, it's like blaming the Beatles is it? You know fundamentally that once these increases in percentage rate of homicides are proven you only have to look at the percentage ethnicity of criminals in prisons for different crimes. That shows where the percentage increases in violent crime and murder come from over the host ethnicity. Your problem is that once it's shown that increases are real that you want to shift the cause onto inequalities....apparently happy with that one cause where in reality there is rarely always one cause...as you recognised with Rome. Essentially once the statistics are recognised all the rational causes other than mass immigration also fall on the sacred cows of your ideology such as social liberalism....So you avoid these responsibilities like the plague instead preferring to shift the entire weight onto willfully unrealistic 'inequality'....something that does contribute to many outcomes but rarely on its own. Oh and I downloaded the book on Audible, which has a cost effective monthly deal. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 9.09am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Crime among immigrant and offspring of immigrants is much higher than the population as a whole. Some demographics are much more likely to commit crime than others. It's that simple. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 7.57am) did the French outlaw the collection of such data. You have crime statistics, and then you have demographic statistics. But never the twain shall meet. any day now in the UK also ? Wilful ignorance just to keep the PC brigade happy ( or less angry ). Edited by PalazioVecchio (14 Sep 2021 9.09am)
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Just like the Godfather 3 you pull me back in. Really, it's like blaming the Beatles is it? You know fundamentally that once these increases in percentage rate of homicides are proven you only have to look at the percentage ethnicity of criminals in prisons for different crimes. That shows where the percentage increases in violent crime and murder come from over the host ethnicity. Your problem is that once its shown that increases are real that you want to shift the cause onto inequalities....apparently happy with that one cause where in reality there is rarely always one cause...as you recognised with Rome. Essentially once the statistics are recognised all the rational causes other than mass immigration also fall on the sacred cows of your ideology such as social liberalism....So you avoid these responsibilities like the plague instead preferring to shift the entire weight onto willfully unrealistic 'inequality'....something that does contribute to many outcomes but rarely on its own. Oh and I downloaded the book on Audible, which has a cost effective monthly deal. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 8.11am) Welcome back, I didn't think that you would stay away so long. There is no proven link between immigration and increased crime. I doubt that you will look at them but perhaps someone will.
Canada Germany Italy USA
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
Welcome back, I didn't think that you would stay away so long. There is no proven link between immigration and increased crime. I doubt that you will look at them but perhaps someone will. Ye
Canada Germany Italy USA
What these studies seem to be saying is that immigration itself and crime are not directly linked. That is obvious. What it also suggests is that the limited opportunities afforded to many immigrants does have an effect on crime. Again obvious. What it actually means is that immigrants are more likely to commit crime. Also, it does not cover the people who are second generation and third generation. The fact that you can call yourself British and were born here does not alter the root causes. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 9.31am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by kuge
Welcome back, I didn't think that you would stay away so long. There is no proven link between immigration and increased crime. I doubt that you will look at them but perhaps someone will.
Canada Germany Italy USA
Even a layman can use a simple search of the historical crime data and see for themselves. A simple look at the prison population tells the truth......Like here, they talk about immigrants making up only one eighth of the prison population....that's a deliberate disingenuous use of immigrant...ignoring second and third generations, ignoring ethnicity....in fact deliberately doing whatever they can to fit the result they want to show. I suspect these studies are looking for a result to fit ideology. Like you academics are mostly on the left and they are part of the power structure. They are scared of results that would lead to job loss and abandonment. So like you, they make it work by omission and explanations. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Sep 2021 9.36am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Come off it. You are choosing one example of a specific group of immigrants and claiming them to be representative of immigrants as a whole. Huguenots were French Protestants. Hardly different culturally, and that many people probably come here every week now. I'm sorry, but you are starting to bore me. We have heard all this denial nonsense from others like you for years, and it does not tally with the real world. Crime among immigrant and offspring of immigrants is much higher than the population as a whole. Some demographics are much more likely to commit crime than others. It's that simple. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Sep 2021 7.57am) So want to discuss immigration into Britain but not before a certain date and only regarding groups above a certain number? You suggest that past experience with immigration into the UK has no relevance but seek to establish a parallel with events over a thousand five hundred years ago. I have posted links above that clearly show immigration does not lead to a rise in crime. This is both in the UK and globally. These are long-term studies that look at trends over decades. Regarding the 50,000 Hugonotes that came to Britain. It is not the same as the number of immigrants that come to Britain in one week. In 2019 614,000 immigrants arrive, however, net immigration was 221,000. (These figures contain overseas students and other that will return home after their study end). That is 4,250 a week. Denial is a word that you use a lot. It characterises much of what you post. If you are bored find something interesting to do. Personally, I find going to the gym helps.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.